Literature DB >> 21228760

Contraceptive methods available to patients of office-based physicians and title X clinics --- United States, 2009-2010.

.   

Abstract

Unintended pregnancies, which accounted for an estimated 49% of all pregnancies in the United States in 2001, more often are associated with adverse outcomes for both mother and child than are intended pregnancies. In 2008, an estimated 36 million U.S. women of reproductive age were in need of family planning services because they were sexually active, able to get pregnant, and not trying to get pregnant; this represented a 6% increase from year 2000 estimates. To assess the provision of various reversible contraceptive methods by U.S family planning providers, CDC mailed a survey on contraceptive provision to random samples of 2,000 office-based physicians and 2,000 federally funded Title X clinics. This report summarizes those results, which indicated that a greater proportion of Title X clinic providers than office-based physicians offered on-site availability of a number of methods, including injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) (96.6% versus 60.9%) and combined oral contraceptive pills (92.1% versus 48.8%). However, a greater proportion of office-based physicians than Title X clinic providers reported on-site availability of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) (56.4% versus 46.6%). Less than maximal use of long-acting, reversible contraceptive methods (LARCs), including IUDs and contraceptive implants, might be a contributing factor to high unintended pregnancy rates in the United States. Improving contraceptive delivery by increasing on-site availability in physicians' offices and clinics of a range of contraceptive methods, including LARCs, might increase contraceptive use and reduce rates of unintended pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21228760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


  13 in total

1.  Knowledge and Training of Intrauterine Devices Among Primary Care Residents: Implications for Graduate Medical Education.

Authors:  Aparna Sridhar; Elizabeth Ruppel Forbes; Kelly Mooney; Radhika Rible
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-03

2.  Healthcare Provider Attitudes Regarding Contraception for Women with Obesity.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Lauren B Zapata; Kathryn M Curtis; Suzanne G Folger; Polly A Marchbanks; Michele G Mandel; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Onsite provision of specialized contraceptive services: does Title X funding enhance access?

Authors:  Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Julie Cross Riedel; Mary Menz; Philip D Darney; Claire D Brindis
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Intrauterine devices at six months: does patient age matter? Results from an urban family medicine federally qualified health center (FQHC) network.

Authors:  Anita Ravi; Linda Prine; Eve Waltermaurer; Natasha Miller; Susan E Rubin
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

5.  Long-acting reversible contraceptive acceptability and unintended pregnancy among women presenting for short-acting methods: a randomized patient preference trial.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Hannah Spector; Charles Monteith; Pai-Lien Chen; Catherine Hart
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  The impact of out-of-pocket costs on the use of intrauterine contraception among women with employer-sponsored insurance.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Stacie B Dusetzina; A Mark Fendrick; Nancy L Keating; Vanessa K Dalton
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Long-acting reversible contraceptive use in urban women from a title X-supported Boston community health center.

Authors:  Hope A Ricciotti; Laura E Dodge; Christina I Ramirez; Katherine Barnes; Michele R Hacker
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2014-10-09

8.  Not seeking yet trying long-acting reversible contraception: a 24-month randomized trial on continuation, unintended pregnancy and satisfaction.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Hannah Spector; Charles Monteith; Pai-Lien Chen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Early Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Uptake of Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Stacie B Dusetzina; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Patterns of contraceptive use among Mexican-origin women.

Authors:  Kari L White; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Demogr Res       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.