Literature DB >> 29468522

Mechanism of evolution by genetic assimilation : Equivalence and independence of genetic mutation and epigenetic modulation in phenotypic expression.

Ken Nishikawa1, Akira R Kinjo2.   

Abstract

Conrad H. Waddington discovered the phenomenon of genetic assimilation through a series of experiments on fruit flies. In those experiments, artificially exerted environmental stress induced plastic phenotypic changes in the fruit flies, but after some generations, the same phenotypic variant started to appear without the environmental stress. Both the initial state (where the phenotypic changes were environmentally induced and plastic) and the final state (where the phenotypic changes were genetically fixed and constitutive) are experimental facts. However, it remains unclear how the environmentally induced phenotypic change in the first generation becomes genetically fixed in the central process of genetic assimilation itself. We have argued that the key to understanding the mechanism of genetic assimilation lies in epigenetics, and proposed the "cooperative model" in which the evolutionary process depends on both genetic and epigenetic factors. Evolutionary simulations based on the cooperative model reproduced the process of genetic assimilation. Detailed analysis of the trajectories has revealed genetic assimilation is a process in which epigenetically induced phenotypic changes are incrementally and statistically replaced with multiple minor genetic mutations through natural selection. In this scenario, epigenetic and genetic changes may be considered as mutually independent but equivalent in terms of their effects on phenotypic changes. This finding rejects the common (and confused) hypothesis that epigenetically induced phenotypic changes depend on genetic mutations. Furthermore, we argue that transgenerational epigenetic inheritance is not required for evolution by genetic assimilation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epigenome; Evo-Devo; Evolutionary synthesis; Phenotype-driven evolution; Phenotypic plasticity; Simulation

Year:  2018        PMID: 29468522      PMCID: PMC5899745          DOI: 10.1007/s12551-018-0403-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys Rev        ISSN: 1867-2450


  41 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development.

Authors:  W Reik; W Dean; J Walter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The role of robustness in phenotypic adaptation and innovation.

Authors:  Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Phenotypic accommodation: adaptive innovation due to developmental plasticity.

Authors:  Mary Jane West-Eberhard
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 2.656

4.  Cohort profile: the Dutch Hunger Winter families study.

Authors:  L H Lumey; Aryeh D Stein; Henry S Kahn; Karin M van der Pal-de Bruin; G J Blauw; Patricia A Zybert; Ezra S Susser
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Adaptation to an extraordinary environment by evolution of phenotypic plasticity and genetic assimilation.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 6.  Developmental evolution and the origins of phenotypic variation.

Authors:  Robert Lickliter
Journal:  Biomol Concepts       Date:  2014-08

Review 7.  Phenotypic plasticity and epigenetic marking: an assessment of evidence for genetic accommodation.

Authors:  Carl D Schlichting; Matthew A Wund
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  Genomic imprinting: the emergence of an epigenetic paradigm.

Authors:  Anne C Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 9.  Hsp90@chromatin.nucleus: an emerging hub of a networker.

Authors:  Ritwick Sawarkar; Renato Paro
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 20.808

10.  Cooperation between phenotypic plasticity and genetic mutations can account for the cumulative selection in evolution.

Authors:  Ken Nishikawa; Akira R Kinjo
Journal:  Biophysics (Nagoya-shi)       Date:  2014-12-17
View more
  7 in total

1.  Heterogeneity of primordial germ cells.

Authors:  Daniel H Nguyen; Rebecca G Jaszczak; Diana J Laird
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Foreword to 'Multiscale structural biology: biophysical principles and mechanisms underlying the action of bio-nanomachines', a special issue in Honour of Fumio Arisaka's 70th birthday.

Authors:  Damien Hall; Junichi Takagi; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2018-03-02

Review 3.  An evolutionary approach to clonally complex hematologic disorders.

Authors:  Emily Schwenger; Ulrich Steidl
Journal:  Blood Cancer Discov       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 4.  Dyslexia as an adaptation to cortico-limbic stress system reactivity.

Authors:  John R Kershner
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2020-04-18

Review 5.  Mitochondrial Short-Term Plastic Responses and Long-Term Evolutionary Dynamics in Animal Species.

Authors:  Sophie Breton; Fabrizio Ghiselli; Liliana Milani
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  Long-Term m5C Methylome Dynamics Parallel Phenotypic Adaptation in the Cyanobacterium Trichodesmium.

Authors:  Nathan G Walworth; Michael D Lee; Egor Dolzhenko; Fei-Xue Fu; Andrew D Smith; Eric A Webb; David A Hutchins
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Bridging Tumorigenesis and Therapy Resistance With a Non-Darwinian and Non-Lamarckian Mechanism of Adaptive Evolution.

Authors:  Francesco Catania; Beata Ujvari; Benjamin Roche; Jean-Pascal Capp; Frédéric Thomas
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.