Literature DB >> 11498579

Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development.

W Reik1, W Dean, J Walter.   

Abstract

DNA methylation is a major epigenetic modification of the genome that regulates crucial aspects of its function. Genomic methylation patterns in somatic differentiated cells are generally stable and heritable. However, in mammals there are at least two developmental periods-in germ cells and in preimplantation embryos-in which methylation patterns are reprogrammed genome wide, generating cells with a broad developmental potential. Epigenetic reprogramming in germ cells is critical for imprinting; reprogramming in early embryos also affects imprinting. Reprogramming is likely to have a crucial role in establishing nuclear totipotency in normal development and in cloned animals, and in the erasure of acquired epigenetic information. A role of reprogramming in stem cell differentiation is also envisaged. DNA methylation is one of the best-studied epigenetic modifications of DNA in all unicellular and multicellular organisms. In mammals and other vertebrates, methylation occurs predominantly at the symmetrical dinucleotide CpG (1-4). Symmetrical methylation and the discovery of a DNA methyltransferase that prefers a hemimethylated substrate, Dnmt1 (4), suggested a mechanism by which specific patterns of methylation in the genome could be maintained. Patterns imposed on the genome at defined developmental time points in precursor cells could be maintained by Dnmt1, and would lead to predetermined programs of gene expression during development in descendants of the precursor cells (5, 6). This provided a means to explain how patterns of differentiation could be maintained by populations of cells. In addition, specific demethylation events in differentiated tissues could then lead to further changes in gene expression as needed. Neat and convincing as this model is, it is still largely unsubstantiated. While effects of methylation on expression of specific genes, particularly imprinted ones (7) and some retrotransposons (8), have been demonstrated in vivo, it is still unclear whether or not methylation is involved in the control of gene expression during normal development (9-13). Although enzymes have been identified that can methylate DNA de novo (Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b) (14), it is unknown how specific patterns of methylation are established in the genome. Mechanisms for active demethylation have been suggested, but no enzymes have been identified that carry out this function in vivo (15-17). Genomewide alterations in methylation-brought about, for example, by knockouts of the methylase genes-result in embryo lethality or developmental defects, but the basis for abnormal development still remains to be discovered (7, 14). What is clear, however, is that in mammals there are developmental periods of genomewide reprogramming of methylation patterns in vivo. Typically, a substantial part of the genome is demethylated, and after some time remethylated, in a cell- or tissue-specific pattern. The developmental dynamics of these reprogramming events, as well as some of the enzymatic mechanisms involved and the biological purposes, are beginning to be understood. Here we look at what is known about reprogramming in mammals and discuss how it might relate to developmental potency and imprinting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11498579     DOI: 10.1126/science.1063443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  890 in total

1.  A rheostat model for a rapid and reversible form of imprinting-dependent evolution.

Authors:  Arthur L Beaudet; Yong-Hui Jiang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Inducible DNA demethylation mediated by the maize Suppressor-mutator transposon-encoded TnpA protein.

Authors:  Hongchang Cui; Nina V Fedoroff
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Impact of folic acid intake during pregnancy on genomic imprinting of IGF2/H19 and 1-carbon metabolism.

Authors:  Aggeliki Tserga; Alexandra M Binder; Karin B Michels
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  DNA methylation screening and analysis.

Authors:  Karilyn E Sant; Muna S Nahar; Dana C Dolinoy
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

5.  Imprinting analysis of porcine MAGEL2 gene in two fetal stages and association analysis with carcass traits.

Authors:  Ling Guo; Mu Qiao; Chao Wang; Rong Zheng; Yuan-Zhu Xiong; Chang-Yan Deng
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Effects of endocrine disruptors on imprinted gene expression in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Eun-Rim Kang; Khursheed Iqbal; Diana A Tran; Guillermo E Rivas; Purnima Singh; Gerd P Pfeifer; Piroska E Szabó
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.528

7.  Chronic prenatal stress epigenetically modifies spinal cord BDNF expression to induce sex-specific visceral hypersensitivity in offspring.

Authors:  J H Winston; Q Li; S K Sarna
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Differential response to abiraterone acetate and di-n-butyl phthalate in an androgen-sensitive human fetal testis xenograft bioassay.

Authors:  Daniel J Spade; Susan J Hall; Camelia M Saffarini; Susan M Huse; Elizabeth V McDonnell; Kim Boekelheide
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Role of chromatin states in transcriptional memory.

Authors:  Sharmistha Kundu; Craig L Peterson
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-02-21

Review 10.  Epigenetics and development of food allergy (FA) in early childhood.

Authors:  Xiumei Hong; Xiaobin Wang
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.