Literature DB >> 29468265

The tridimensional geometry of the proximal femur should determine the design of cementless femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty.

Julien Wegrzyn1,2, Jean-Paul Roux3, Charlotte Loriau3, Nicolas Bonin4, Vincent Pibarot5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Using a cementless femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA), optimal filling of the proximal femoral metaphyseal volume (PFMV) and restoration of the extramedullary proximal femoral (PF) parameters (i.e., femoral offset (FO), neck length (FNL), and head height (FHH)) constitute key goals for optimal hip biomechanics, functional outcome, and THA survivorship. However, almost 30% of mismatch between the PF anatomy and implant geometry of the most widely implanted non-modular cementless femoral stem has been demonstrated in a computed tomography scan (CT scan) study. Therefore, this anatomic study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the intra- and extramedullary PF parameters using tridimensional CT scan reconstructions.
METHODS: One hundred fifty-one CT scans of adult healthy hips were obtained from 151 male Caucasian patients (mean age = 66 ± 11 years) undergoing lower limb CT scan arteriography. Tridimensional PF reconstructions and parameter measurements were performed using a corrected PF coronal plane-defined by the femoral neck and diaphyseal canal longitudinal axes-to avoid influence of PF helitorsion and femoral neck version on extramedullary PF parameters.
RESULTS: Independently of the femoral neck-shaft angle, the PFMV was significantly and positively correlated with the FO, FNL, and FHH (r = 0.407 to 0.420; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: This study emphasized that the tridimensional PF geometry measurement in the corrected coronal plane of the femoral neck can be useful to determine and optimize the design of a non-modular cementless femoral stem. Particularly, continuous homothetic size progression of the intra- and extramedullary PF parameters should be achieved to assure stem fixation and restore anatomic hip biomechanics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cementless femoral stem; Computed tomography; Proximal femur; Total hip arthroplasty; Tridimensional anatomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29468265     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-3843-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  33 in total

Review 1.  The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Jens Dargel; Johannes Oppermann; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Jan Bredow; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Isao Asayama; Samatchai Chamnongkich; Kathy J Simpson; Tracy L Kinsey; Ormonde M Mahoney
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Accuracy of reconstruction of the hip using computerised three-dimensional pre-operative planning and a cementless modular neck.

Authors:  E Sariali; A Mouttet; G Pasquier; E Durante; Y Catone
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-03

4.  Radiographic fit and fill analysis of a new second-generation proximally coated cementless stem compared to its predicate design.

Authors:  Kimona Issa; Robert Pivec; Thies Wuestemann; Tiffany Tatevossian; Jim Nevelos; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Agreement Between Proximal Femoral Geometry and Component Design in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Implications for Implant Choice.

Authors:  Christoph K Boese; Jens Dargel; Janine Jostmeier; Peer Eysel; Michael Frink; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  The anatomic basis of femoral component design.

Authors:  P C Noble; J W Alexander; L J Lindahl; D T Yew; W M Granberry; H S Tullos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Eighty-six Percent Failure Rate of a Modular-Neck Femoral Stem Design at 3 to 5 Years: Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Derek T Bernstein; Morteza Meftah; Jaya Paranilam; Stephen J Incavo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D P Sakalkale; P F Sharkey; K Eng; W J Hozack; R H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at 25-30 Years of a Hip Stem Fully Coated With Hydroxylapatite.

Authors:  Laurent Jacquot; Michel P Bonnin; Alain Machenaud; Julien Chouteau; Mo Saffarini; Jean-Pierre Vidalain
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Exchangeable Femoral Neck (Dual-Modular) THA Prostheses Have Poorer Survivorship Than Other Designs: A Nationwide Cohort of 324,108 Patients.

Authors:  Sandrine Colas; Assia Allalou; Antoine Poichotte; Philippe Piriou; Rosemary Dray-Spira; Mahmoud Zureik
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  2 in total

1.  The optimization of the length of the lower limbs after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Viktor Shilnikov; Alexey Denisov; Khadizhat Masueva
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Biomechanical study on the stability and strain conduction of intertrochanteric fracture fixed with proximal femoral nail antirotation versus triangular supporting intramedullary nail.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Wei Chen; Yingze Zhang; Haicheng Wang; Weijie Yang; Kai Ding; Yanbin Zhu; Yifan Zhang; Chuan Ren; Kuo Zhao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.479

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.