Literature DB >> 16892987

Hedonic contrast and condensation: good stimuli make mediocre stimuli less good and less different.

Debra A Zellner1, Dawn Allen, Monique Henley, Scott Parker.   

Abstract

Loud sounds make soft sounds softer (contrast) and also make them less discriminable (which we call condensation). We report on parallel phenomena in hedonics: Good stimuli reduce the pleasantness of less good stimuli, and also reduce people's preferences among the less good stimuli. In Experiment 1, subjects rated the pleasantness of fruit juices diluted to approximate hedonic neutrality. Subjects who had just previously drunk and rated some good-tasting full-strength juices rated thediluted juices lower than did subjects who had not (hedonic contrast). In Experiment 2, subjects drank pairs of diluted juices and rated their preference for one juice over the other. Subjects who had just previously drunk and rated pairs of full-strength juices gave lower preference ratings between the diluted juices than did subjects who had not (condensation). Thus the same stimulus set produced contrast in Experiment 1 and condensation in Experiment 2, paralleling results in loudness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16892987     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

1.  Context effects in visual length perception: role of ocular, retinal, and spatial location.

Authors:  Yoav Arieh; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-04

2.  Top-down gain control in the auditory system: evidence from identification and discrimination experiments.

Authors:  Scott Parker; Dana R Murphy; Bruce A Schneider
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-05

3.  Recalibrating the auditory system: a speed-accuracy analysis of intensity perception.

Authors:  Yoav Arieh; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments?

Authors:  B Schneider; S Parker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-11

5.  Intensity resolution and subjective magnitude in psychophysical scaling.

Authors:  L M Ward; J Armstrong; N Golestani
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-07

6.  The effect of stimulus range on perceived contrast: evidence for contrast gain control.

Authors:  B Schneider; S Parker; G Moraglia
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1996-12

7.  The category effect with rating scales: number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation.

Authors:  A Parducci; D H Wedell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Range and sequence effects in judgment.

Authors:  G R Lockhead; J Hinson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-07

9.  Magnitude estimation and sensory matching.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-06

10.  "Recalibrating" the auditory system: the perception of loudness.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  8 in total

1.  Exposure to acute stress is associated with attenuated sweet taste.

Authors:  Mustafa Al'Absi; Motohiro Nakajima; Stephanie Hooker; Larry Wittmers; Tiffany Cragin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Exercise, affect, and adherence: an integrated model and a case for self-paced exercise.

Authors:  David M Williams
Journal:  J Sport Exerc Psychol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.016

3.  The Contrast Effect in Temporal and Probabilistic Discounting.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Guibing He
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-07

4.  Sequential effects in preference decision: Prior preference assimilates current preference.

Authors:  Seah Chang; Chai-Youn Kim; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of choose-a-movie and approach-avoidance paradigms to measure social motivation.

Authors:  Indu Dubey; Danielle Ropar; Antonia Hamilton
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2017-11-11

6.  Inducing preference reversals in aesthetic choices for paintings: Introducing the contrast paradigm.

Authors:  Zorry Belchev; Glen E Bodner; Jonathan M Fawcett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Human Amygdala Represents the Complete Spectrum of Subjective Valence.

Authors:  Jingwen Jin; Christina Zelano; Jay A Gottfried; Aprajita Mohanty
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  High-value decisions are fast and accurate, inconsistent with diminishing value sensitivity.

Authors:  Blair R K Shevlin; Stephanie M Smith; Jan Hausfeld; Ian Krajbich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 12.779

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.