Literature DB >> 1857632

An "open-transformed scale" for correcting ceiling effects and enhancing retest reliability: the example of pain.

E Fernandez1, T E Nygren, B E Thorn.   

Abstract

The use of closed scales (with anchors at each end) to measure pain was found to produce ceiling effects characterized by a deceleration of ratings toward the upper end of the scale. This was consistent with previous research. Apart from producing nonlinear functions, the closed scale also limited test-retest reliability because of subjects' tendencies to correct their distorted ratings in subsequent trials. However, an open-ended scale coupled with transformation of reported ratings into a decile scale virtually eliminated the ceiling effect, thus producing consistently linear functions and maximizing test-retest reliability. This finding may have implications for the measurement of other sensory and psychological phenomena, especially those in which the property evaluated varies in a continuous fashion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1857632     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  10 in total

1.  Anchor effects in absolute judgments.

Authors:  C W ERIKSEN; H W HAKE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-02

2.  The compression block technique.

Authors:  J I Laszlo; P J Bairstow
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  The category effect with rating scales: number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation.

Authors:  A Parducci; D H Wedell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The submaximal effort tourniquet test: its use in evaluating experimental and chronic pain.

Authors:  Paul A Moore; Gary H Duncan; Donald S Scott; John M Gregg; Jawahar N Ghia
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  The psychophysics of cold pressor pain and its modification through hypnotic suggestion.

Authors:  E R Hilgard; J C Ruch; A F Lange; J R Lenox; A H Morgan; L B Sachs
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1974 Mar-Jun

6.  Experimental pain produced by the submaximum effort tourniquet technique: further evidence of validity.

Authors:  G M Smith; E Lowenstein; J H Hubbard; H K Beecher
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Sensory and cognitive factors in judgments of loudness.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Ratio scaling of pain perception with the submaximum effort tourniquet technique.

Authors:  Corey D Fox; Herbert G Steger; James H Jennison
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  An experimental pain method sensitive to morphine in man: the submaximum effort tourniquet technique.

Authors:  G M Smith; L D Egbert; R A Markowitz; F Mosteller; H K Beecher
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  The influence of anxiety and pain sensitivity on experimental pain in man.

Authors:  Beat Von Graffenried; Rolf Adler; Klaus Abt; Erich Nüesch; René Spiegel
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 6.961

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.