BACKGROUND: Programmatic assessment is the intentional collection of key data from multiple sources for both assessment of learning and assessment for learning. OBJECTIVE: We developed a system of programmatic assessment (PA) to identify competency progression (summative) and assessment for learning to assist residents in their formative development. METHODS: The programmatic assessment was designed iteratively from 2014 through 2016. All assessments were first categorized by competency domain and source of assessment. The number of assessment modalities for each competency domain was collected. These multisource assessments were then mapped by program leadership to the milestones to develop a master PA blueprint. A resident learning management system provided the platform for aggregating formative and summative data, allowing residents and faculty ongoing access to guide learning and assessment. A key component of programmatic assessment was to support resident integration of assessment information through feedback by faculty after shifts and during monthly formal assessments, semiannual resident reviews, and summative judgments by the Clinical Competency Committee. RESULTS: Through the PA, the 6 competency domains are assessed through multiple modalities: patient care (22 different assessments), professionalism (18), systems-based practice (17), interprofessional and communication skills (16), medical knowledge (11), and practice-based learning and improvement (6). Each assessment provides feedback to the resident in various formats. Our programmatic assessment has been utilized for more than 2 years with iterative improvements. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of programmatic assessment allowed our program to organize diverse, multisourced feedback to drive both formative and summative assessments.
BACKGROUND: Programmatic assessment is the intentional collection of key data from multiple sources for both assessment of learning and assessment for learning. OBJECTIVE: We developed a system of programmatic assessment (PA) to identify competency progression (summative) and assessment for learning to assist residents in their formative development. METHODS: The programmatic assessment was designed iteratively from 2014 through 2016. All assessments were first categorized by competency domain and source of assessment. The number of assessment modalities for each competency domain was collected. These multisource assessments were then mapped by program leadership to the milestones to develop a master PA blueprint. A resident learning management system provided the platform for aggregating formative and summative data, allowing residents and faculty ongoing access to guide learning and assessment. A key component of programmatic assessment was to support resident integration of assessment information through feedback by faculty after shifts and during monthly formal assessments, semiannual resident reviews, and summative judgments by the Clinical Competency Committee. RESULTS: Through the PA, the 6 competency domains are assessed through multiple modalities: patient care (22 different assessments), professionalism (18), systems-based practice (17), interprofessional and communication skills (16), medical knowledge (11), and practice-based learning and improvement (6). Each assessment provides feedback to the resident in various formats. Our programmatic assessment has been utilized for more than 2 years with iterative improvements. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of programmatic assessment allowed our program to organize diverse, multisourced feedback to drive both formative and summative assessments.
Authors: Erik W Driessen; Jan van Tartwijk; Marjan Govaerts; Pim Teunissen; Cees P M van der Vleuten Journal: Med Teach Date: 2012 Impact factor: 3.650
Authors: C P M van der Vleuten; L W T Schuwirth; E W Driessen; J Dijkstra; D Tigelaar; L K J Baartman; J van Tartwijk Journal: Med Teach Date: 2012 Impact factor: 3.650
Authors: Sylvia Heeneman; Andrea Oudkerk Pool; Lambert W T Schuwirth; Cees P M van der Vleuten; Erik W Driessen Journal: Med Educ Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Samantha R Hauff; Laura R Hopson; Eve Losman; Marcia A Perry; Monica L Lypson; Jonathan Fischer; Sally A Santen Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Michael S Beeson; Wallace A Carter; Theodore A Christopher; Jonathan W Heidt; James H Jones; Lynne E Meyer; Susan B Promes; Kevin G Rodgers; Philip H Shayne; Mary Jo Wagner; Susan R Swing Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2013-03
Authors: Karen E Hauer; Olle Ten Cate; Christy K Boscardin; William Iobst; Eric S Holmboe; Benjamin Chesluk; Robert B Baron; Patricia S O'Sullivan Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2016-05
Authors: Harold G J Bok; Pim W Teunissen; Robert P Favier; Nancy J Rietbroek; Lars F H Theyse; Harold Brommer; Jan C M Haarhuis; Peter van Beukelen; Cees P M van der Vleuten; Debbie A D C Jaarsma Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Stephanie N Stapleton; Michael Cassara; Tiffany Moadel; Brendan W Munzer; Christopher Sampson; Ambrose H Wong; Eisha Chopra; Jane Kim; Suzanne Bentley Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2022-06-23
Authors: Teresa M Chan; Stefanie S Sebok-Syer; Warren J Cheung; Martin Pusic; Christine Stehman; Michael Gottlieb Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2020-11-05
Authors: Ashley Pavlic; Dana Liu; Kara Baker; Joseph House; Michael Byrd; Tina Martinek; Diana O'Leary; Sally A Santen Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2018-11-19