Literature DB >> 22364455

The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: a Maastricht case report.

Erik W Driessen1, Jan van Tartwijk, Marjan Govaerts, Pim Teunissen, Cees P M van der Vleuten.   

Abstract

The differences of learning experiences in the workplace put challenges on the assessment: the assessment programme should be aligned with the general competency framework of the curriculum and also fit to the differences in learning contexts of the workplace. We used van der Vleuten's programmatic assessment model to develop a workplace-based assessment programme for final year clerkships. We aimed to design a programme that stimulates learning, supports assessment decision, is feasible and non-bureaucratic. The first experiences with the programme show that students think that the programme has high learning value and the assessment is sufficiently robust. Many of the commonly reported weaknesses of work-based assessment (not a good fit with the educational context, too complex, too bureaucratic and too much work) were not mentioned by the students.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22364455     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.652242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  22 in total

Review 1.  A Call for an Integrated Program of Assessment.

Authors:  David W Fielding; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Programmatic Assessment in Emergency Medicine: Implementation of Best Practices.

Authors:  Marcia Perry; Andrew Linn; Brendan W Munzer; Laura Hopson; Ambrosya Amlong; Michael Cole; Sally A Santen
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-02

3.  The reliability of a portfolio of workplace-based assessments in anesthesia training.

Authors:  Damian J Castanelli; Joyce M W Moonen-van Loon; Brian Jolly; Jennifer M Weller
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Taking Rater Exposure to Trainees Into Account When Explaining Rater Variability.

Authors:  Christy K Boscardin; Marjo Wijnen-Meijer; Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-12

5.  Guidelines: the do's, don'ts and don't knows of feedback for clinical education.

Authors:  Janet Lefroy; Chris Watling; Pim W Teunissen; Paul Brand
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

6.  The use of a portfolio in postgraduate medical education - reflect, assess and account, one for each or all in one?

Authors:  Sylvia Heeneman; Erik W Driessen
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-15

7.  EULAR portfolio for Rheumatology training: a EULAR School of Rheumatology initiative.

Authors:  Marloes van Onna; Sofia Ramiro; Catherine Haines; Mette Holland-Fischer; Jose Antonio Pereira da Silva; Jean Dudler; Chris Edwards; Alessia Alunno; Elena Nikiphorou; Louise Falzon; Francisca Sivera
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2021-06

8.  Narrative descriptions should replace grades and numerical ratings for clinical performance in medical education in the United States.

Authors:  Janice L Hanson; Adam A Rosenberg; J Lindsey Lane
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-21

Review 9.  Work-based assessments: making the transition from participation to engagement.

Authors:  Anand Prakash Swayamprakasam; Ashvina Segaran; Lynne Allery
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2014-02-26

10.  Do portfolios have a future?

Authors:  Erik Driessen
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.