Literature DB >> 29455253

Incorporation of the fluoroless C-Arm Trainer at the American Urological Association hands on training percutaneous renal access.

Yasser A Noureldin1,2, David M Hoenig3, Philip Zhao4, Sammy E Elsamra3, Joshua Stern5, Geoffrey Gaunay3, Piruz Motamedinia3,6, Zeph Okeke3, Ardeshir R Rastinehad7, Robert M Sweet8,9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess for usefulness and validity evidence for incorporating the C-Arm Trainer (CAT) simulator into the annual AUA hands on course for training percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The course started with a didactic session followed by four stations for training the "bull's eye" technique using the CAT simulator. Each station included a pre-test, 30-min practice on the simulator, and post-test. All participants were assessed using a 4-item checklist. All participants were asked to fill in a qualitative self-assessment questionnaire after the pre- and the post-test, and respond to a course evaluation questionnaire and post-course survey.
RESULTS: A total of 38 physicians, who attended the hands on course, voluntarily participated in the study. Only 21.1% had previous practice on PCNL simulators. Compared with the results of the checklist total score and the qualitative self-assessment questionnaire scores after the pre-test, there was significant improvement in the checklist total score (p < 0.001), temporal demands (p = 0.003), situational stress (p = 0.003, and performance (0.003) after the post-test. A total of 14 (36%) participants responded to the course evaluation questionnaire, 50% evaluated the course as excellent, 28.6% as very good, and 21.4% as good. Unfortunately, only five (13%) participants responded to the post-course survey, 4/5 implemented the new competencies and knowledge into their practice, and 3/5 have attempted to obtain fluoroscopic guided PCA without assistance.
CONCLUSION: The CAT simulator was considered useful for training the percutaneous renal access procedure. There was significant improvement in the qualitative and quantitative assessment parameters after the post-test compared with the pre-test.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy; Skills; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29455253     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2219-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  21 in total

1.  Surgical competence and surgical proficiency: definitions, taxonomy, and metrics.

Authors:  Richard M Satava; Anthony G Gallagher; Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  A randomized, controlled, prospective study validating the acquisition of percutaneous renal collecting system access skills using a computer based hybrid virtual reality surgical simulator: phase I.

Authors:  Bodo E Knudsen; Edward D Matsumoto; Ben H Chew; Brooke Johnson; Vitaly Margulis; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Margaret S Pearle; Stephen E Pautler; John D Denstedt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Economics of stone management.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Diagnosing technical competence in six bedside procedures: comparing checklists and a global rating scale in the assessment of resident performance.

Authors:  Alison Walzak; Maria Bacchus; Jeffrey P Schaefer; Kelly Zarnke; Jennifer Glow; Charlene Brass; Kevin McLaughlin; Irene W Y Ma
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 5.  Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Update, Trends, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Khurshid R Ghani; Sero Andonian; Matthew Bultitude; Mihir Desai; Guido Giusti; Zhamshid Okhunov; Glenn M Preminger; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II.

Authors:  Dean Assimos; Amy Krambeck; Nicole L Miller; Manoj Monga; M Hassan Murad; Caleb P Nelson; Kenneth T Pace; Vernon M Pais; Margaret S Pearle; Glenn M Preminger; Hassan Razvi; Ojas Shah; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Alexandria C Smith; Janet M Hanley; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Simulation for Percutaneous Renal Access: Where Are We?

Authors:  Yasser A Noureldin; Sero Andonian
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  The role of simulation in urological training - A quantitative study of practice and opinions.

Authors:  Abdullatif Aydin; Kamran Ahmed; Ahmed M A Shafi; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.392

10.  Does the presence of a percutaneous renal access influence fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Yasser A Noureldin; Mohamed A Elkoushy; Sero Andonian
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2015-08-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  Introduction of an ex-vivo pig model for teaching percutaneous nephrolithotomy access techniques.

Authors:  Connor M Forbes; Jonathan Lim; Justin Chan; Ryan F Paterson; Mantu Gupta; Ben H Chew; Kymora Scotland
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Innovations in Urologic Surgical Training.

Authors:  Runzhuo Ma; Sharath Reddy; Erik B Vanstrum; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 3.092

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.