Literature DB >> 17678993

Economics of stone management.

Yair Lotan1, Margaret S Pearle.   

Abstract

Cost, in addition to efficacy and morbidity, has become an important factor in determining the best therapeutic modality for a variety of disease states. A comprehensive literature search finds that, in general, for staghorn calculi, percutaneous nephrostolithotomy is more cost-effective than shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for stones greater than 2 cm in any dimension, while SWL may be cost-effective for smaller stones. For ureteral stones, observation is the least costly treatment strategy. Among surgical options, ureteroscopy is less costly than SWL. For single and recurrent stone formers, medical prophylactic strategies involving drug therapy are more costly than conservative therapy involving dietary measures alone. However, drug strategies yield fewer stone recurrences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17678993     DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2007.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  16 in total

1.  Arguments for a comprehensive metabolic evaluation of the first-time stone former.

Authors:  Ryan F Paterson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Comparison of two different running models for the shock wave lithotripsy machine in Taipei City Hospital: self-support versus outsourcing cooperation.

Authors:  Chi-Yi Huang; Shiou-Sheng Chen; Li-Kuei Chen
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-07-14

3.  Costs variations for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the U.S. from 2003-2015: A contemporary analysis of an all-payer discharge database.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Leow; Anne-Sophie Valiquette; Benjamin I Chung; Steven L Chang; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Rus Korets; Naeem Bhojani
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Incorporation of the fluoroless C-Arm Trainer at the American Urological Association hands on training percutaneous renal access.

Authors:  Yasser A Noureldin; David M Hoenig; Philip Zhao; Sammy E Elsamra; Joshua Stern; Geoffrey Gaunay; Piruz Motamedinia; Zeph Okeke; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Robert M Sweet
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Metabolic evaluation guidelines in patients with nephrolithiasis: Are they being followed? Results of a national, multi-institutional, quality-assessment study.

Authors:  Sabrina S Harmouch; Hiba Abou-Haidar; Hassan Elhawary; Thomas Grgic; Andrea G Lantz; Jason Y Lee; Ben H Chew; Sero Andonian; Naeem Bhojani
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Hypercalciuria, hyperoxaluria, and hypocitraturia screening from random urine samples in patients with calcium lithiasis.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Arrabal-Polo; Salvador Arias-Santiago; María Sierra Girón-Prieto; Felix Abad-Menor; Fernando López-Carmona Pintado; Armando Zuluaga-Gomez; Miguel Arrabal-Martin
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-04-07

Review 7.  Chronic kidney disease in kidney stone formers.

Authors:  Andrew D Rule; Amy E Krambeck; John C Lieske
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Biological effects of extracorporeal shock waves on fibroblasts. A review.

Authors:  Roberto Frairia; Laura Berta
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2012-04-01

Review 9.  Medical therapy of stone disease: from prevention to promotion of passage options.

Authors:  Michael Lipkin; Ojas Shah
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Estimating the nationwide, hospital based economic impact of pediatric urolithiasis.

Authors:  Hsin-Hsiao S Wang; John S Wiener; Michael E Lipkin; Charles D Scales; Sherry S Ross; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.