Literature DB >> 29451016

Evaluation of a New Noninvasive Glucose Monitoring Device by Means of Standardized Meal Experiments.

Andreas Pfützner1,2,3, Stephanie Strobl1, Filiz Demircik1,3, Lisa Redert3, Johannes Pfützner3, Anke H Pfützner2, Alexander Lier1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frequent blood glucose readings are the most cumbersome aspect of diabetes treatment for many patients. The noninvasive TensorTip Combo Glucometer (CoG) component employs dedicated mathematical algorithms to analyze the collected signal and to predict tissue glucose at the fingertip. This study presents the performance of the CoG (the invasive and the noninvasive components) during a standardized meal experiment.
METHODS: Each of the 36 participants (18 females and males each, age: 49 ± 18 years, 14 healthy subjects, 6 type 1 and 16 type 2 patients) received a device for conducting calibration at home. Thereafter, they ingested a standardized meal. Blood glucose was assessed from capillary blood samples by means of the (non)invasive device, YSI Stat 2300 plus, Contour Next at time points -30, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes. Statistical analysis was performed by consensus error grid (CEG) and calculation of mean absolute relative difference (MARD) in comparison to YSI.
RESULTS: For the noninvasive (NI) CoG technology, 100% of the data pairs were found in CEG zones A (96.6%) and B (3.4%); 100% were seen in zone A for the invasive component and Contour Next. MARD was calculated to be 4.2% for Contour Next, 9.2% for the invasive component, and 14.4% for the NI component.
CONCLUSIONS: After appropriate individual calibration of the NI technology, both the NI and the invasive CoG components reliably tracked tissue and blood glucose values, respectively. This may enable patients with diabetes to monitor their glucose levels frequently, reliably, and most of all pain-free.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chaos theory; color sensor imaging; fingertip tissue; invasive device component; noninvasive glucose prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29451016      PMCID: PMC6232728          DOI: 10.1177/1932296818758769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  25 in total

Review 1.  The UK prospective diabetes study (UKPDS): clinical and therapeutic implications for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  P King; I Peacock; R Donnelly
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Benefits of self-monitoring blood glucose in the management of new-onset Type 2 diabetes mellitus: the St Carlos Study, a prospective randomized clinic-based interventional study with parallel groups.

Authors:  Alejandra Durán; Patricia Martín; Isabelle Runkle; Natalia Pérez; Rosario Abad; Mercedes Fernández; Laura Del Valle; Maria Fuencisla Sanz; Alfonso Luis Calle-Pascual
Journal:  J Diabetes       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.006

3.  Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  David M Nathan; Patricia A Cleary; Jye-Yu C Backlund; Saul M Genuth; John M Lachin; Trevor J Orchard; Philip Raskin; Bernard Zinman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Under-utilization of capillary glucose monitoring by type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Brindisi; Jina Hahn; Jean-Louis Chiasson; Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 5.602

5.  Technical aspects of the Parkes error grid.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; David C Klonoff; Scott Pardo; Joan L Parkes
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

6.  Is the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose related to long-term metabolic control? Multicenter analysis including 24,500 patients from 191 centers in Germany and Austria.

Authors:  M Schütt; W Kern; U Krause; P Busch; A Dapp; R Grziwotz; I Mayer; J Rosenbauer; C Wagner; A Zimmermann; W Kerner; R W Holl
Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.949

7.  Phobia of self-injecting and self-testing in insulin-treated diabetes patients: opportunities for screening.

Authors:  E D Mollema; F J Snoek; R J Heine; H M van der Ploeg
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  Invasiveness as a barrier to self-monitoring of blood glucose in diabetes.

Authors:  Julie Wagner; Carl Malchoff; Gina Abbott
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Frequency and motives of blood glucose self-monitoring in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  M V Hansen; U Pedersen-Bjergaard; S R Heller; T M Wallace; A K Rasmussen; H V Jørgensen; S Pramming; B Thorsteinsson
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.602

10.  ROSSO-in-praxi-international: long-term effects of self-monitoring of blood glucose on glucometabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus not treated with insulin.

Authors:  Kerstin Kempf; Tsvetalina Tankova; Stephan Martin
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 6.118

View more
  8 in total

1.  Device and Method for Noninvasive Glucose Assessment.

Authors:  Yosef Joseph Segman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-03-24

2.  New Paradigm of Personalized Glycemic Control Using Glucose Temporal Density Histograms.

Authors:  Uriel Trahtemberg; Tova Hallas; Yehonatan Segman; Ella Sheiman; Michal Shasha; Kobi Nissim; Yosef Joseph Segman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-08

3.  Noninvasive Monitoring of Blood Glucose Using Color-Coded Photoplethysmographic Images of the Illuminated Fingertip Within the Visible and Near-Infrared Range: Opportunities and Questions.

Authors:  Thorsten Vahlsing; Sven Delbeck; Steffen Leonhardt; H Michael Heise
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-09-15

Review 4.  Improving patient self-care using diabetes technologies.

Authors:  Valeria Alcántara-Aragón
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.565

Review 5.  Review of Non-invasive Glucose Sensing Techniques: Optical, Electrical and Breath Acetone.

Authors:  Maryamsadat Shokrekhodaei; Stella Quinones
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Is Raman the best strategy towards the development of non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring devices for diabetes management?

Authors:  Biagio Todaro; Filippo Begarani; Federica Sartori; Stefano Luin
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 5.545

Review 7.  Products for Monitoring Glucose Levels in the Human Body With Noninvasive Optical, Noninvasive Fluid Sampling, or Minimally Invasive Technologies.

Authors:  Trisha Shang; Jennifer Y Zhang; Andreas Thomas; Mark A Arnold; Beatrice N Vetter; Lutz Heinemann; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-13

8.  Dual-Retarder Mueller Polarimetry System for Extraction of Optical Properties of Serum Albumin Protein Media.

Authors:  Quoc-Hung Phan; Chien-Yuan Han; Chi-Hsiang Lien; Thi-Thu-Hien Pham
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.