BACKGROUND: Patient portals specifically designed for the inpatient setting have significant potential to improve patient care. However, little is known about how the users of this technology, the patients, may interact with the inpatient portals. As a result, hospitals have limited ability to design approaches that support patient use of the portal. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the user experience associated with an inpatient portal. METHODS: We used a Think-Aloud protocol to study user interactions with a commercially available inpatient portal-MyChart Bedside (MCB). Study participants included 19 English-speaking adults over the age of 18 years. In one-on-one sessions, participants narrated their experience using the MCB application and completing eight specific tasks. Recordings were transcribed and coded into three dimensions of the user experience: physical, cognitive, and sociobehavioral. RESULTS: Our analysis of the physical experience highlighted the navigational errors and technical challenges associated with the use of MCB. We also found that issues associated with the cognitive experience included comprehension problems that spurred anxiety and uncertainty. Analysis of the sociobehavioral experience suggested that users have different learning styles and preferences for learning including self-guided, handouts, and in-person training. CONCLUSION: Inpatient portals may be an effective tool to improve the patient experience in the hospital. Moreover, making this technology available to inpatients may help to foster ongoing use of technology across the care continuum. However, deriving the benefits from the technology requires appropriate support. We identified multiple opportunities for hospital management to intervene. In particular, teaching patients to use the application by making a variety of instructional materials available could help to reduce several identified barriers to use. Additionally, hospitals should be prepared to manage patient anxiety and increased questioning arising from the availability of information in the inpatient portal application. Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart.
BACKGROUND:Patient portals specifically designed for the inpatient setting have significant potential to improve patient care. However, little is known about how the users of this technology, the patients, may interact with the inpatient portals. As a result, hospitals have limited ability to design approaches that support patient use of the portal. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the user experience associated with an inpatient portal. METHODS: We used a Think-Aloud protocol to study user interactions with a commercially available inpatient portal-MyChart Bedside (MCB). Study participants included 19 English-speaking adults over the age of 18 years. In one-on-one sessions, participants narrated their experience using the MCB application and completing eight specific tasks. Recordings were transcribed and coded into three dimensions of the user experience: physical, cognitive, and sociobehavioral. RESULTS: Our analysis of the physical experience highlighted the navigational errors and technical challenges associated with the use of MCB. We also found that issues associated with the cognitive experience included comprehension problems that spurred anxiety and uncertainty. Analysis of the sociobehavioral experience suggested that users have different learning styles and preferences for learning including self-guided, handouts, and in-person training. CONCLUSION: Inpatient portals may be an effective tool to improve the patient experience in the hospital. Moreover, making this technology available to inpatients may help to foster ongoing use of technology across the care continuum. However, deriving the benefits from the technology requires appropriate support. We identified multiple opportunities for hospital management to intervene. In particular, teaching patients to use the application by making a variety of instructional materials available could help to reduce several identified barriers to use. Additionally, hospitals should be prepared to manage patientanxiety and increased questioning arising from the availability of information in the inpatient portal application. Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart.
Authors: Tom Delbanco; Jan Walker; Jonathan D Darer; Joann G Elmore; Henry J Feldman; Suzanne G Leveille; James D Ralston; Stephen E Ross; Elisabeth Vodicka; Valerie D Weber Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Kevin J O'Leary; Mary E Lohman; Eckford Culver; Audrey Killarney; G Randy Smith; David M Liebovitz Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jonathan S Wald; Blackford Middleton; Amy Bloom; Dan Walmsley; Mary Gleason; Elizabeth Nelson; Qi Li; Marianna Epstein; Lynn Volk; David W Bates Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Date: 2004
Authors: Richard J Holden; Pascale Carayon; Ayse P Gurses; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; A Ant Ozok; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez Journal: Ergonomics Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Jennifer E Prey; Janet Woollen; Lauren Wilcox; Alexander D Sackeim; George Hripcsak; Suzanne Bakken; Susan Restaino; Steven Feiner; David K Vawdrey Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Ann Scheck McAlearney; Cynthia J Sieck; Jennifer L Hefner; Alison M Aldrich; Daniel M Walker; Milisa K Rizer; Susan D Moffatt-Bruce; Timothy R Huerta Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2016-11-29
Authors: Kevin J O'Leary; Rashmi K Sharma; Audrey Killarney; Lyndsey S O'Hara; Mary E Lohman; Eckford Culver; David M Liebovitz; Kenzie A Cameron Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Cynthia J Sieck; Daniel M Walker; Jennifer L Hefner; Jaclyn Volney; Timothy R Huerta; Ann Scheck McAlearney Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Peter L T Hoonakker; Rebecca J Rankin; Jennifer C Passini; Jenny A Bunton; Bradley D Ehlenfeldt; Shannon M Dean; Anne S Thurber; Michelle M Kelly Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Michelle M Kelly; Anne S Thurber; Ryan J Coller; Alisa Khan; Shannon M Dean; Windy Smith; Peter L T Hoonakker Journal: Hosp Pediatr Date: 2019-04
Authors: Daniel M Walker; Alice Gaughan; Naleef Fareed; Susan Moffatt-Bruce; Ann Scheck McAlearney Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Anuj K Dalal; Patricia Dykes; Lipika Samal; Kelly McNally; Eli Mlaver; Cathy S Yoon; Stuart R Lipsitz; David W Bates Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Lisa V Grossman; Ruth M Masterson Creber; Jessica S Ancker; Beatriz Ryan; Fernanda Polubriaginof; Min Qian; Irma Alarcon; Susan Restaino; Suzanne Bakken; George Hripcsak; David K Vawdrey Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Ann Scheck McAlearney; Daniel M Walker; Alice Gaughan; Susan Moffatt-Bruce; Timothy R Huerta Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Ann Scheck McAlearney; Alice Gaughan; Sarah R MacEwan; Naleef Fareed; Timothy R Huerta Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2019-05-13 Impact factor: 3.536