Cynthia J Sieck1,2, Daniel M Walker1,2, Jennifer L Hefner1,2, Jaclyn Volney2, Timothy R Huerta1,2,3,4, Ann Scheck McAlearney1,2,3,4. 1. Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States. 2. Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States. 3. Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States. 4. Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient portals, and the secure messaging feature in particular, have been studied in the outpatient setting, but research in the inpatient setting is relatively less mature. OBJECTIVE: To understand the topics discussed in secure messaging in the inpatient environment, we analyzed and categorized messages sent within an inpatient portal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational study examined the content of all secure messages sent from December 2013 to June 2017 within an inpatient portal at a large Midwestern academic medical center (AMC). We analyzed a total of 2,598 messages, categorizing them by sender (patient, family, or care team member), type, and topic, and conducted a descriptive analysis of categories and an examination of code co-occurrence. RESULTS: Patients were the most frequent message senders (63%); family members sent the fewest messages (10%). We identified five types of messages: Alert/Request; Thanks; Response; Question; and Other (typo/test message). Patient messages included Alerts/Requests (38%), Questions (31%), Statements of Thanks (24%), Response (1.2%), and Other (5%). We also identified 14 nonmutually exclusive message topics: Medication; Procedure/Treatment Plan; Schedule; Pain; Results; Diet; Discharge; Non-Medication Questions; Provider Requests; Symptoms; Custodial; Technical Issues; Potential Error; and Contact Information. Patient message topics most commonly discussed Symptoms (18%), Procedure/Treatment Plan (14%), or Pain (12%). CONCLUSION: Our analysis of secure message content suggests certain message types and topics such as Alerts/Requests and Questions about symptoms and treatment plans are particularly important to patients. These findings demonstrate that both patients and family members utilize the secure messaging function to engage in the care process by posing questions, making requests, and alerting staff to problems. As this technology is implemented in additional facilities, future work should examine how use of secure messaging may be influenced by factors including patients' demographics, reasons for hospitalization, and length of stay. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
BACKGROUND:Patient portals, and the secure messaging feature in particular, have been studied in the outpatient setting, but research in the inpatient setting is relatively less mature. OBJECTIVE: To understand the topics discussed in secure messaging in the inpatient environment, we analyzed and categorized messages sent within an inpatient portal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational study examined the content of all secure messages sent from December 2013 to June 2017 within an inpatient portal at a large Midwestern academic medical center (AMC). We analyzed a total of 2,598 messages, categorizing them by sender (patient, family, or care team member), type, and topic, and conducted a descriptive analysis of categories and an examination of code co-occurrence. RESULTS:Patients were the most frequent message senders (63%); family members sent the fewest messages (10%). We identified five types of messages: Alert/Request; Thanks; Response; Question; and Other (typo/test message). Patient messages included Alerts/Requests (38%), Questions (31%), Statements of Thanks (24%), Response (1.2%), and Other (5%). We also identified 14 nonmutually exclusive message topics: Medication; Procedure/Treatment Plan; Schedule; Pain; Results; Diet; Discharge; Non-Medication Questions; Provider Requests; Symptoms; Custodial; Technical Issues; Potential Error; and Contact Information. Patient message topics most commonly discussed Symptoms (18%), Procedure/Treatment Plan (14%), or Pain (12%). CONCLUSION: Our analysis of secure message content suggests certain message types and topics such as Alerts/Requests and Questions about symptoms and treatment plans are particularly important to patients. These findings demonstrate that both patients and family members utilize the secure messaging function to engage in the care process by posing questions, making requests, and alerting staff to problems. As this technology is implemented in additional facilities, future work should examine how use of secure messaging may be influenced by factors including patients' demographics, reasons for hospitalization, and length of stay. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Authors: Alex H Krist; Steven H Woolf; Stephen F Rothemich; Robert E Johnson; J Eric Peele; Tina D Cunningham; Daniel R Longo; Ghalib A Bello; Gary R Matzke Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Janet Woollen; Jennifer Prey; Lauren Wilcox; Alexander Sackeim; Susan Restaino; Syed T Raza; Suzanne Bakken; Steven Feiner; George Hripcsak; David Vawdrey Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Maria T Britto; Holly B Jimison; Jennifer Knopf Munafo; Jennifer Wissman; Michelle L Rogers; William Hersh Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jodi Summers Holtrop; William Corser; Gregory Jones; Gary Brooks; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Manfred Stommel Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2006 Jul-Aug
Authors: Mita Sanghavi Goel; Tiffany L Brown; Adam Williams; Romana Hasnain-Wynia; Jason A Thompson; David W Baker Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-05-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Patricia C Dykes; Diana Stade; Frank Chang; Anuj Dalal; George Getty; Ravali Kandala; Jaeho Lee; Lisa Lehman; Kathleen Leone; Anthony F Massaro; Marsha Milone; Kelly McNally; Kumiko Ohashi; Katherine Robbins; David W Bates; Sarah Collins Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2014-11-14
Authors: Daniel M Walker; Cynthia J Sieck; Terri Menser; Timothy R Huerta; Ann Scheck McAlearney Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Daniel M Walker; Alice Gaughan; Naleef Fareed; Susan Moffatt-Bruce; Ann Scheck McAlearney Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Consuela C Yousef; Teresa M Salgado; Ali Farooq; Keisha Burnett; Laura E McClelland; Laila C Abu Esba; Hani S Alhamdan; Sahal Khoshhal; Ibrahim Aldossary; Omar A Alyas; Jonathan P DeShazo Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Alice A Gaughan; Daniel M Walker; Lindsey N Sova; Shonda Vink; Susan D Moffatt-Bruce; Ann Scheck McAlearney Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2022-04-13 Impact factor: 2.342