| Literature DB >> 29443957 |
Yan-Sheng Huang1, Chao-Yuan Ge2, Hang Feng2, Hai-Ping Zhang2, Xing-Bang Niu2, Shao-Yan Shi1, Zi-Qi Zhu1, Ding-Jun Hao2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to explore the feasibility and efficacy of bone cement-augmented short-segmental pedicle screw fixation in treating Kümmell disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS From June 2012 to June 2015, 18 patients with Kümmell disease with spinal canal stenosis were enrolled in this study. Each patient was treated with bone cement-augmented short-segment fixation and posterolateral bone grafting, and posterior decompression was performed when needed. All patients were followed up for 12-36 months. We retrospectively reviewed outcomes, including the Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) score, anterior and posterior heights of fractured vertebrae, kyphotic Cobb angle, and neurological function by Frankel classification. RESULTS The VAS grades, ODI scores, anterior heights of affected vertebrae, and kyphotic Cobb angles showed statistically significant differences between pre- and postoperative and between preoperative and final follow-up values (P<0.05), whereas the differences between postoperative and final follow-up values were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The differences between posterior vertebral heights at each time point were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Improved neurological function was observed in 12 cases at final follow-up. Three cases had complications, including asymptomatic cement leakage in 2 patients and delayed wound infection in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS Bone cement-augmented short-segment pedicle screw fixation is safe and effective for treating Kümmell disease, and can achieve satisfactory correction of kyphosis and vertebral height, with pain relief and improvement in neurological function, with few complications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29443957 PMCID: PMC5820999 DOI: 10.12659/msm.905804
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
General data of patients.
| Case | Gender | Age (Year) | Trauma History | Medical History (Month) | Duration of Follow-up (Month) | Damaged Segmet | BMD (T score) | Comorbidity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Female | 72 | Fall injury | 3 | 19 | T12 | −3.5 | Hypertension |
| 2 | Female | 69 | Fall injury | 1 | 24 | L1 | −2.9 | Hypertension |
| 3 | Male | 78 | Lifting weight | 4 | 13 | T11 | −4.2 | No |
| 4 | Female | 75 | No | 2 | 28 | T12 | −3.5 | Hypertension |
| 5 | Male | 64 | Lifting weight | 6 | 31 | L2 | −2.7 | Heart disease |
| 6 | Female | 80 | Fall injury | 3 | 16 | T9 | −3.7 | No |
| 7 | Female | 58 | Lifting weight | 5 | 36 | T12 | −3.2 | Diabetes mellitus |
| 8 | Female | 70 | Fall injury | 4 | 25 | T11 | −3.8 | Hypertension |
| 9 | Male | 73 | Fall injury | 3 | 18 | L1 | −4.3 | Hypertension |
| 10 | Male | 82 | No | 2 | 15 | T12 | −3.7 | No |
| 11 | Female | 67 | Lifting weight | 4 | 28 | L1 | −3.2 | Heart disease |
| 12 | Female | 74 | No | 5 | 21 | T10 | −4.5 | No |
| 13 | Male | 69 | Fall injury | 7 | 30 | T12 | −3.7 | Diabetes mellitus |
| 14 | Female | 72 | Fall injury | 1 | 27 | T11 | −3.5 | Hypertension |
| 15 | Male | 79 | No | 2 | 12 | L2 | −4.0 | No |
| 16 | Female | 64 | Fall injury | 6 | 36 | T12 | −3.4 | Diabetes mellitus |
| 17 | Female | 70 | Lifting weight | 3 | 24 | T12 | −2.9 | No |
| 18 | Male | 75 | Fall injury | 5 | 19 | T12 | −4.3 | Hypertension |
BMD – bone mineral density.
Figure 1Preoperative X-ray and CT show L1 burst fracture with intravertebral vacuum cleft, and MRI showed a limited low signal and spinal cord compression.
Evaluation indexs at preoperation, postoperation, and final follow-up.
| VAS score | ODI score (%) | Anterior vertebral height (mm) | Posterior vertebral height (mm) | Kyphotic cobb angle (°) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperation | 8.1±0.6 | 84.1±6.1 | 11.6±1.7 | 20.5±2.0 | 29.9±1.8 |
| Postoperation | 2.7±0.4 | 31.0±3.1 | 20.1±2.0 | 20.7±1.7 | 12.3±1.8 |
| Final Follow-up | 2.9±0.7 | 32.2±3.8 | 19.4±2.9 | 20.3±2.5 | 12.9±2.7 |
P<0.05 vs. preoperation values;
P>0.05 vs. postoperation values;
P>0.05 vs. preoperation values;
P>0.05 vs. preoperation values.
VAS – visual analog scale, ODI – Oswestry Disability Index.
Number of patients by Frankel classification at different times.
| Frankel classification | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | |
| Preopreation | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Postoperation | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| Final Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 14 |
Figure 2The postoperative and final follow-up reviews revealed good internal fixation position and satisfactory posterior decompression.