Literature DB >> 19818957

Kyphoplasty for chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures via unipedicular versus bipedicular approachment: a comparative study in early stage.

ChunMao Chen1, Liang Chen, Yong Gu, Yun Xu, Yong Liu, XiaoLiang Bai, XueSong Zhu, HuiLin Yang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic compression fractures (OVCFs) commonly occur in aged people, and as much as one-third of these fractures progress to chronic pain. Kyphoplasty (KP) is proved to be efficacious for pain relief and vertebral height restoration in chronic OVCFs, but there is still no data available about the clinical and radiographical outcomes compared by unipedicular and bipedicular KP in treating chronic painful OVCFs.
PURPOSE: To assess the clinical and radiographical outcomes in treating chronic painful OVCFs compared by unipedicular and bipedicular KP.
METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with a total of sixty-six chronic painful OVCFs were enroled in our study. They were randomly allocated into two groups: group I (n=33) was treated with unipedicular KP and group II (n=25) with bipedicular KP. The operation times for each group were recorded and compared. Preoperative and postoperative of visual analogue scores (VAS) and oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were compared 2 weeks after surgery within each group and between groups. The radiographic outcomes were evaluated by the restoration rate (RR) in the most compressed point of the vertebral bodies.
RESULTS: Significant improvement on the VAS, ODI scores and RR was noted in each group (p<0.001), and there is no significant difference existing in clinical outcomes between the two groups. The mean operation time for each vertebra in group I was significantly shorter than in group II (p<0.001). But the RR in group II was higher than in group I (p=0.041).
CONCLUSION: Both unipedicular kyphoplasty and bipedicular kyphoplasty can achieve satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes in treating the chronic painful OVCFs and the operation time is shorter in unipedicular kyphoplasty. However, the bipedicular kyphoplasty is more efficacious in height restoration. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19818957     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.09.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  18 in total

1.  CT fluoroscopy-guided vertebral augmentation with a radiofrequency-induced, high-viscosity bone cement (StabiliT(®)): technical results and polymethylmethacrylate leakages in 25 patients.

Authors:  Christoph Gregor Trumm; Tobias F Jakobs; Robert Stahl; Torleif A Sandner; Philipp M Paprottka; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph J Zech; Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Safety and efficacy of percutaneous kyphoplasty assisted with O-arm navigation for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures at T6 to T9 vertebrae.

Authors:  Yijian Zhang; Hao Liu; Fan He; Angela Chen; Huilin Yang; Bin Pi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Is unilateral kyphoplasty as effective and safe as bilateral kyphoplasties for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhaobo Huang; Shuanglin Wan; Lei Ning; Shiliang Han
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Comparative analysis of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Melih Bozkurt; Gokmen Kahilogullari; Mevci Ozdemir; Onur Ozgural; Ayhan Attar; Sukru Caglar; Can Ates
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-02-06

Review 5.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xing Cheng; Hou-Qing Long; Jing-Hui Xu; Yang-Liang Huang; Fo-Bao Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  [Effectiveness of posterior short-segmental fixation with bone cement augmentation for stage Kümmell's disease with spinal canal stenosis].

Authors:  Hao Chen; Junsong Yang; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-06-15

7.  Percutaneous kyphoplasty combined with the posterior screw-rod system in treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures.

Authors:  Jiang Wu; Yong-Qing Xu; Han-Fen Chen; Yong-Yue Su; Min Zhu; Chong-Tao Zhu
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  New perspective for third generation percutaneous vertebral augmentation procedures: Preliminary results at 12 months.

Authors:  Daniele Vanni; Andrea Pantalone; Francesco Bigossi; Filippo Pineto; Danilo Lucantoni; Vincenzo Salini
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2012-07

9.  Comparison of Unilateral versus Bilateral Kyphoplasty in Multiple Myeloma Patients and the Importance of Preoperative Planning.

Authors:  Ioannis D Papanastassiou; Mohamed Eleraky; Ryan Murtagh; Zinon T Kokkalis; Maria Gerochristou; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-06-09

10.  Percutaneous kyphoplasty versus posterior spinal fixation with vertebroplasty for treatment of Kümmell disease: A case-control study with minimal 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Hou-Kun Li; Ding-Jun Hao; Jun-Song Yang; Da-Geng Huang; Cheng-Cheng Yu; Jia-Nan Zhang; Lin Gao; Han Li; Bing Qian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.