Literature DB >> 29442473

Parent and Child Perceptions of the Benefits of Research Participation.

Victoria A Miller1, Chris Feudtner2.   

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to describe parents' and children's perceptions of the health benefits of research participation. We assessed 180 children ages 8 to 17 years who recently enrolled in medical research and their parents. Of the 136 parents with children on observational protocols, 41% indicated that there would be a health benefit to the child. Their descriptions of benefits revealed that many envisioned a future health benefit to the child arising from improvements in treatment due to the research. There was no difference in ratings of likelihood or importance of benefit between parents of children enrolled in observational protocols versus interventional protocols. Children enrolled in observational protocols were more likely to respond "don't know" to the question about potential health benefit compared to children on interventional protocols. For both observational and interventional protocols, the informed consent process may be enhanced when research personnel explicitly differentiate between different types of potential benefits, including heretofore-unrecognized future direct health benefits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Informed consent; assent; benefit; therapeutic misconception

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 29442473      PMCID: PMC5790123     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IRB        ISSN: 0193-7758


  25 in total

1.  Perception of risk associated with asthma research procedures among adolescents, parents, and pediatricians.

Authors:  Robert D Annett; Janet L Brody; David G Scherer; Elizabeth A Perkett
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 10.793

2.  Comparisons of adolescent and parent willingness to participate in minimal and above-minimal risk pediatric asthma research protocols.

Authors:  Janet L Brody; Robert D Annett; David G Scherer; Mandy L Perryman; Keely M W Cofrin
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; L H Roth; C W Lidz; P Benson; W Winslade
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Priorities for disclosure of the elements of informed consent for research: a comparison between parents and investigators.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Angela Robinson; Shobha Malviya
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.556

6.  Factors that influence parental decisions to participate in clinical research: consenters vs nonconsenters.

Authors:  Alejandro Hoberman; Nader Shaikh; Sonika Bhatnagar; Mary Ann Haralam; Diana H Kearney; D Kathleen Colborn; Michelle L Kienholz; Li Wang; Clareann H Bunker; Ron Keren; Myra A Carpenter; Saul P Greenfield; Hans G Pohl; Ranjiv Mathews; Marva Moxey-Mims; Russell W Chesney
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Expectations and experiences of investigators and parents involved in a clinical trial for Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Holly L Peay; Aad Tibben; Tyler Fisher; Ethan Brenna; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Parental permission and perceived research benefits in adolescent STI research.

Authors:  Mary A Ott; Joshua G Rosenberger; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  The culture of faith and hope: patients' justifications for their high estimations of expected therapeutic benefit when enrolling in early phase oncology trials.

Authors:  Daniel P Sulmasy; Alan B Astrow; M Kai He; Damon M Seils; Neal J Meropol; Ellyn Micco; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Participation of children in clinical research: factors that influence a parent's decision to consent.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Shobha Malviya
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Researching the Experiences of Children with Cancer: Considerations for Practice.

Authors:  Jessika Boles; Sarah Daniels
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-16

2.  "Free Testing and PrEP without Outing Myself to Parents:" Motivation to participate in oral and injectable PrEP clinical trials among adolescent men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Celia B Fisher; Adam L Fried; Leah Ibrahim Puri; Kathryn Macapagal; Brian Mustanski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.