Literature DB >> 11982841

Priorities for disclosure of the elements of informed consent for research: a comparison between parents and investigators.

Alan R Tait1, Terri Voepel-Lewis, Angela Robinson, Shobha Malviya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disclosure is a key element of the informed consent process. This study examines and compares the priorities for disclosure of the elements of informed consent between parents of paediatric research subjects and investigators.
METHODS: The study sample comprised 184 parents who had been approached for permission to allow their child to participate in a clinical anaesthesia or surgery study. Parents were asked to rank 11 elements of informed consent that they believed were most important for them to know before allowing their child to participate in a research study. In addition, 38 investigators were asked to rank, in order of importance, the same elements that they felt were most important for parents to know.
RESULTS: The results showed that risk was the most important element considered by both parents and investigators. However, parents placed significantly greater importance on knowledge of the potential benefits to their child (direct) and to other children (indirect) compared with investigators, and less importance on the details of the protocol and the element of voluntariness.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated differences in the priorities for disclosure of the elements of consent between parents and investigators. As such, they may be important in directing the investigator to focus on the elements that are most important to parents and thus maximize their ability to provide truly informed consent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11982841     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00851.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  11 in total

1.  The effect of format on parents' understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: a comparison between text, tables, and graphics.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010-07

2.  Waivers and Alterations to Consent in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Respecting the Principle of Respect for Persons.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

3.  Parental consent in paediatric clinical research.

Authors:  H Chappuy; F Doz; S Blanche; J-C Gentet; G Pons; J-M Tréluyer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Parent and Child Perceptions of the Benefits of Research Participation.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

5.  Communicating and understanding the purpose of pediatric phase I cancer trials.

Authors:  Melissa K Cousino; Stephen J Zyzanski; Amy D Yamokoski; Rebecca A Hazen; Justin N Baker; Robert B Noll; Susan R Rheingold; J Russell Geyer; Stewart C Alexander; Dennis Drotar; Eric D Kodish
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Parents' understanding of information regarding their child's postoperative pain management.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Robin M Snyder; Shobha Malviya
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Measuring informed consent capacity in an Alzheimer's disease clinical trial.

Authors:  Peter D Guarino; Julia E Vertrees; Sanjay Asthana; Mary Sano; Maria D Llorente; Muralidhar Pallaki; Susan Love; Gerard D Schellenberg; Maurice W Dysken
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2016-09-20

8.  Clinicians' views and experiences of offering two alternative consent pathways for participation in a preterm intrapartum trial: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Celine Y Chhoa; Alexandra Sawyer; Susan Ayers; Angela Pushpa-Rajah; Lelia Duley
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  How do parents experience being asked to enter a child in a randomised controlled trial?

Authors:  Valerie Shilling; Bridget Young
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 10.  A Guide to Pain Assessment and Management in the Neonate.

Authors:  Norina Witt; Seth Coynor; Christopher Edwards; Hans Bradshaw
Journal:  Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep       Date:  2016-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.