Literature DB >> 25062694

Neural bases of imitation and pantomime in acute stroke patients: distinct streams for praxis.

Markus Hoeren1, Dorothee Kümmerer2, Tobias Bormann2, Lena Beume2, Vera M Ludwig2, Magnus-Sebastian Vry3, Irina Mader4, Michel Rijntjes2, Christoph P Kaller5, Cornelius Weiller5.   

Abstract

Apraxia is a cognitive disorder of skilled movements that characteristically affects the ability to imitate meaningless gestures, or to pantomime the use of tools. Despite substantial research, the neural underpinnings of imitation and pantomime have remained debated. An influential model states that higher motor functions are supported by different processing streams. A dorso-dorsal stream may mediate movements based on physical object properties, like reaching or grasping, whereas skilled tool use or pantomime rely on action representations stored within a ventro-dorsal stream. However, given variable results of past studies, the role of the two streams for imitation of meaningless gestures has remained uncertain, and the importance of the ventro-dorsal stream for pantomime of tool use has been questioned. To clarify the involvement of ventral and dorsal streams in imitation and pantomime, we performed voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping in a sample of 96 consecutive left-hemisphere stroke patients (mean age ± SD, 63.4 ± 14.8 years, 56 male). Patients were examined in the acute phase after ischaemic stroke (after a mean of 5.3, maximum 10 days) to avoid interference of brain reorganization with a reliable lesion-symptom mapping as best as possible. Patients were asked to imitate 20 meaningless hand and finger postures, and to pantomime the use of 14 common tools depicted as line drawings. Following the distinction between movement engrams and action semantics, pantomime errors were characterized as either movement or content errors, respectively. Whereas movement errors referred to incorrect spatio-temporal features of overall recognizable movements, content errors reflected an inability to associate tools with their prototypical actions. Both imitation and pantomime deficits were associated with lesions within the lateral occipitotemporal cortex, posterior inferior parietal lobule, posterior intraparietal sulcus and superior parietal lobule. However, the areas specifically related to the dorso-dorsal stream, i.e. posterior intraparietal sulcus and superior parietal lobule, were more strongly associated with imitation. Conversely, in contrast to imitation, pantomime deficits were associated with ventro-dorsal regions such as the supramarginal gyrus, as well as brain structures counted to the ventral stream, such as the extreme capsule. Ventral stream involvement was especially clear for content errors which were related to anterior temporal damage. However, movement errors were not consistently associated with a specific lesion location. In summary, our results indicate that imitation mainly relies on the dorso-dorsal stream for visuo-motor conversion and on-line movement control. Conversely, pantomime additionally requires ventro-dorsal and ventral streams for access to stored action engrams and retrieval of tool-action relationships.
© The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apraxia; imitation; pantomime; ventral stream; voxel-based lesion–symptom mapping

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25062694     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awu203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  35 in total

1.  Movement Imitation via an Abstract Trajectory Representation in Dorsal Premotor Cortex.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Steven A Jax; Louisa L Smith; Laurel J Buxbaum; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Visual neglect after left-hemispheric lesions: a voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping study in 121 acute stroke patients.

Authors:  Lena-Alexandra Beume; Markus Martin; Christoph P Kaller; Stefan Klöppel; Charlotte S M Schmidt; Horst Urbach; Karl Egger; Michel Rijntjes; Cornelius Weiller; Roza M Umarova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Functional connectivity associated with hand shape generation: Imitating novel hand postures and pantomiming tool grips challenge different nodes of a shared neural network.

Authors:  Guy Vingerhoets; Amanda Clauwaert
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  [Networks involved in motor cognition : Physiology and pathophysiology of apraxia].

Authors:  M Martin; J Hermsdörfer; S Bohlhalter; P H Weiss
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  Hand-independent representation of tool-use pantomimes in the left anterior intraparietal cortex.

Authors:  Kenji Ogawa; Fumihito Imai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Limb apraxia and the left parietal lobe.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Jennifer Randerath
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

7.  Action and semantic tool knowledge - Effective connectivity in the underlying neural networks.

Authors:  Nina N Kleineberg; Anna Dovern; Ellen Binder; Christian Grefkes; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink; Peter H Weiss
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Shared and Distinct Neuroanatomic Regions Critical for Tool-related Action Production and Recognition: Evidence from 131 Left-hemisphere Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Leyla Y Tarhan; Christine E Watson; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Gaze anchoring guides real but not pantomime reach-to-grasp: support for the action-perception theory.

Authors:  Jessica R Kuntz; Jenni M Karl; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  A Cognitive Overview of Limb Apraxia.

Authors:  Angela Bartolo; Heidi Stieglitz Ham
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.