Literature DB >> 29439366

The potential dual role of transcallosal inhibition in post-stroke motor recovery.

Federica Bertolucci1,2, Carmelo Chisari1, Felipe Fregni2.   

Abstract

Up to now, the mechanism of motor impairment and recovery after stroke has been thought to be based on the interhemispheric competition model. According to this model, which assumes that suppressing the excitability of contralesional hemisphere will enhance recovery by reducing transcallosal inhibition (TCI) of the stroke hemisphere, many clinical trials used non-invasive brain stimulation to improve motor function. Despite some positive findings, meta-analysis shows an important source of variability in the results, questioning whether the interhemispheric competition model would be exhaustive enough to explain the positive results or whether other mechanisms could explain the motor effects of inhibitory stimulation in the contralesional hemisphere. The goal of this study was to review the relationship between increased TCI and motor impairment after stroke.A systematic review of clinical studies investigating TCI through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in stroke patients and the relationship of this metric with motor recovery was then performed. After a literary search in PubMed eleven articles were included. The potential role of several covariates was examined and discussed.Overall, the importance of TCI as a putative mechanism for stimulation of the contralesional hemisphere seems to depend on the baseline motor function. In other words, from evidence coming mostly from chronic patients, modulation of abnormal TCI seems to be useful for patients with good motor function and less important in patients with poor motor function. TCI seems to be negatively correlated with mirror movements of the paretic hand. It can be inferred that suppressing the activity of the contralesional hemisphere could be beneficial for patients with good residual motor function and strong TCI, but not for those with poor motor function and weak TCI. Baseline motor function and measure of TCI should be taken into account for stratification of patients in clinical trials and for the design of customized treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stroke; motor recovery; transcallosal inhibition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29439366     DOI: 10.3233/RNN-170778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  17 in total

1.  Self-powered robots to reduce motor slacking during upper-extremity rehabilitation: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  Edward P Washabaugh; Emma Treadway; R Brent Gillespie; C David Remy; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Combining Fluoxetine and rTMS in Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Camila Bonin Pinto; Leon Morales-Quezada; Polyana Vulcano de Toledo Piza; Dian Zeng; Faddi Ghassan Saleh Vélez; Isadora Santos Ferreira; Pedro Henrique Lucena; Dante Duarte; Fernanda Lopes; Mirret M El-Hagrassy; Luiz Vicente Rizzo; Erica C Camargo; David J Lin; Nicole Mazwi; Qing Mei Wang; Randie Black-Schaffer; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Interhemispheric asymmetry of the motor cortex excitability in stroke: relationship with sensory-motor impairment and injury chronicity.

Authors:  Marina Berenguer-Rocha; Adriana Baltar; Sérgio Rocha; Lívia Shirahige; Rodrigo Brito; Kátia Monte-Silva
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Role of Interhemispheric Cortical Interactions in Poststroke Motor Function.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Palmer; Lewis A Wheaton; Whitney A Gray; Mary Alice Saltão da Silva; Steven L Wolf; Michael R Borich
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Bilateral Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Reveals New Insights Into the Interhemispheric Competition Model in Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Jayme S Knutson; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; Andre G Machado; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhiqing Tang; Kaiyue Han; Rongrong Wang; Yue Zhang; Hao Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Post-stroke Dysphagia in Acute Stage.

Authors:  Fengjiao Zou; Xiaoxu Chen; Lingchuan Niu; Yule Wang; Jiaquan Chen; Changqing Li; Linyan Tong; Jiani Li
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-10-23       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 8.  Searching for the optimal tDCS target for motor rehabilitation.

Authors:  Isadora Santos Ferreira; Beatriz Teixeira Costa; Clara Lima Ramos; Pedro Lucena; Aurore Thibaut; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Theta burst stimulation for upper limb motor dysfunction in patients with stroke: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Bo Liu; Jian-Guo Zhong; Xi-Li Xiao; Yu-Xi Li; Yi-Jie Huang; Yong-Guo Liu; Chi Zhang; Rong-Jiang Jin; Tian-Yu Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Does a combination treatment of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and occupational therapy improve upper limb muscle paralysis equally in patients with chronic stroke caused by cerebral hemorrhage and infarction?: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hisashi Tatsuno; Toyohiro Hamaguchi; Jinichi Sasanuma; Kiyohito Kakita; Takatsugu Okamoto; Masato Shimizu; Naoki Nakaya; Masahiro Abo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.