Literature DB >> 30400120

Self-powered robots to reduce motor slacking during upper-extremity rehabilitation: a proof of concept study.

Edward P Washabaugh1,2, Emma Treadway3, R Brent Gillespie3,4, C David Remy3,4, Chandramouli Krishnan1,2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic rehabilitation is a highly promising approach to recover lost functions after stroke or other neurological disorders. Unfortunately, robotic rehabilitation currently suffers from "motor slacking", a phenomenon in which the human motor system reduces muscle activation levels and movement excursions, ostensibly to minimize metabolic- and movement-related costs. Consequently, the patient remains passive and is not fully engaged during therapy. To overcome this limitation, we envision a new class of body-powered robots and hypothesize that motor slacking could be reduced if individuals must provide the power to move their impaired limbs via their own body (i.e., through the motion of a healthy limb).
OBJECTIVE: To test whether a body-powered exoskeleton (i.e. robot) could reduce motor slacking during robotic training.
METHODS: We developed a body-powered robot that mechanically coupled the motions of the user's elbow joints. We tested this passive robot in two groups of subjects (stroke and able-bodied) during four exercise conditions in which we controlled whether the robotic device was powered by the subject or by the experimenter, and whether the subject's driven arm was engaged or at rest. Motor slacking was quantified by computing the muscle activation changes of the elbow flexor and extensor muscles using surface electromyography.
RESULTS: Subjects had higher levels of muscle activation in their driven arm during self-powered conditions compared to externally-powered conditions. Most notably, subjects unintentionally activated their driven arm even when explicitly told to relax when the device was self-powered. This behavior was persistent throughout the trial and did not wane after the initiation of the trial.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide novel evidence indicating that motor slacking can be reduced by self-powered robots; thus demonstrating promise for rehabilitation of impaired subjects using this new class of wearable system. The results also serve as a foundation to develop more sophisticated body-powered robots (e.g., with controllable transmissions) for rehabilitation purposes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rehabilitation robotics, hemiparesis, active engagement, EMG, metabolic cost,zzm321990wearable, cable robot

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30400120      PMCID: PMC6817341          DOI: 10.3233/RNN-180830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  69 in total

1.  Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort.

Authors:  Jeremy L Emken; Raul Benitez; Athanasios Sideris; James E Bobrow; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Robot-assisted motor training: assistance decreases exploration during reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Albert Sans-Muntadas; Jaime E Duarte; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

3.  Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: a comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses.

Authors:  S G Millstein; H Heger; G A Hunter
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Corticospinal responses of quadriceps are abnormally coupled with hip adductors in chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Yasin Dhaher
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 5.  Physically interactive robotic technology for neuromotor rehabilitation.

Authors:  Neville Hogan; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  A wearable resistive robot facilitates locomotor adaptations during gait.

Authors:  Edward P Washabaugh; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Andreas R Luft; Sandy McCombe-Waller; Jill Whitall; Larry W Forrester; Richard Macko; John D Sorkin; Jörg B Schulz; Andrew P Goldberg; Daniel F Hanley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Rhythmic bilateral movement training modulates corticomotor excitability and enhances upper limb motricity poststroke: a pilot study.

Authors:  James W Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.177

9.  Dynamic intra- and interhemispheric interactions during unilateral and bilateral hand movements assessed with fMRI and DCM.

Authors:  Christian Grefkes; Simon B Eickhoff; Dennis A Nowak; Manuel Dafotakis; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Error augmentation enhancing arm recovery in individuals with chronic stroke: a randomized crossover design.

Authors:  Farnaz Abdollahi; Emily D Case Lazarro; Molly Listenberger; Robert V Kenyon; Mark Kovic; Ross A Bogey; Donald Hedeker; Borko D Jovanovic; James L Patton
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.919

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effect of paired-pulse stimulus parameters on the two phases of short interval intracortical inhibition in the quadriceps muscle group.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Motor slacking during resisted treadmill walking: Can visual feedback of kinematics reduce this behavior?

Authors:  Edward P Washabaugh; Luis H Cubillos; Alexandra C Nelson; Belinda T Cargile; Edward S Claflin; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 2.746

3.  Systematic review of novel technology-based interventions for ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Steven Mulackal Thomas; Ellie Delanni; Brandon Christophe; Edward Sander Connolly
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.830

4.  A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Jin Ho Park; Gyulee Park; Ha Yeon Kim; Ji-Yeong Lee; Yeajin Ham; Donghwan Hwang; Suncheol Kwon; Joon-Ho Shin
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.262

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.