Literature DB >> 29431574

Dynamic Diffuse Optical Tomography for Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Jacqueline E Gunther1, Emerson A Lim1, Hyun K Kim1, Molly Flexman1, Mirella Altoé1, Jessica A Campbell1, Hanina Hibshoosh1, Katherine D Crew1, Kevin Kalinsky1, Dawn L Hershman1, Andreas H Hielscher1.   

Abstract

Purpose To identify dynamic optical imaging features that associate with the degree of pathologic response in patients with breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Materials and Methods Of 40 patients with breast cancer who participated in a longitudinal study between June 2011 and March 2016, 34 completed the study. There were 13 patients who obtained a pathologic complete response (pCR) and 21 patients who did not obtain a pCR. Imaging data from six subjects were excluded from the study because either the patients dropped out of the study before it was finished or there was an instrumentation malfunction. Two weeks into the treatment regimen, three-dimensional images of both breasts during a breath hold were acquired by using dynamic diffuse optical tomography. Features from the breath-hold traces were used to distinguish between response groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and sensitivity analysis were used to determine the degree of association with 5-month treatment outcome. Results An ROC curve analysis showed that this method could identify patients with a pCR with a positive predictive value of 70.6% (12 of 17), a negative predictive value of 94.1% (16 of 17), a sensitivity of 92.3% (12 of 13), a specificity of 76.2% (16 of 21), and an area under the ROC curve of 0.85. Conclusion Several dynamic optical imaging features obtained within 2 weeks of NAC initiation were identified that showed statistically significant differences between patients with pCR and patients without pCR as determined 5 months after treatment initiation. If confirmed in a larger cohort prospective study, these dynamic imaging features may be used to predict treatment outcome as early as 2 weeks after treatment initiation. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29431574      PMCID: PMC5978455          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018161041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  42 in total

1.  Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  A Karahaliou; K Vassiou; N S Arikidis; S Skiadopoulos; T Kanavou; L Costaridou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Baseline tumor oxygen saturation correlates with a pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Shigeto Ueda; Darren Roblyer; Albert Cerussi; Amanda Durkin; Anais Leproux; Ylenia Santoro; Shanshan Xu; Thomas D O'Sullivan; David Hsiang; Rita Mehta; John Butler; Bruce J Tromberg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Selecting the neoadjuvant treatment by molecular subtype: how to maximize the benefit?

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Caterina Fontanella
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Optical biomarkers for breast cancer derived from dynamic diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Molly L Flexman; Hyun K Kim; Jacqueline E Gunther; Emerson A Lim; Maria C Alvarez; Elise Desperito; Kevin Kalinsky; Dawn L Hershman; Andreas H Hielscher
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Paclitaxel decreases the interstitial fluid pressure and improves oxygenation in breast cancers in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical implications.

Authors:  Alphonse G Taghian; Rita Abi-Raad; Sherif I Assaad; Adrian Casty; Marek Ancukiewicz; Eren Yeh; Peryhan Molokhia; Khaled Attia; Timothy Sullivan; Irene Kuter; Yves Boucher; Simon N Powell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Digital optical tomography system for dynamic breast imaging.

Authors:  Molly L Flexman; Michael A Khalil; Rabah Al Abdi; Hyun K Kim; Christopher J Fong; Elise Desperito; Dawn L Hershman; Randall L Barbour; Andreas H Hielscher
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Tumor angiogenesis change estimated by using diffuse optical spectroscopic tomography: demonstrated correlation in women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer?

Authors:  Marius G Pakalniskis; Wendy A Wells; Mary C Schwab; Heather M Froehlich; Shudong Jiang; Zhongze Li; Tor D Tosteson; Steven P Poplack; Peter A Kaufman; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Prospective validation of immunological infiltrate for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer--a substudy of the neoadjuvant GeparQuinto trial.

Authors:  Yasmin Issa-Nummer; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Sibylle Loibl; Georg Kunz; Valentina Nekljudova; Iris Schrader; Bruno Valentin Sinn; Hans-Ullrich Ulmer; Ralf Kronenwett; Marianne Just; Thorsten Kühn; Kurt Diebold; Michael Untch; Frank Holms; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Jörg-Olaf Habeck; Manfred Dietel; Friedrich Overkamp; Petra Krabisch; Gunter von Minckwitz; Carsten Denkert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Optical malignancy parameters for monitoring progression of breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  David R Busch; Regine Choe; Mark A Rosen; Wensheng Guo; Turgut Durduran; Michael D Feldman; Carolyn Mies; Brian J Czerniecki; Julia Tchou; Angela Demichele; Mitchell D Schnall; Arjun G Yodh
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  8 in total

1.  Non-contact dynamic diffuse optical tomography imaging system for evaluating lower extremity vasculature.

Authors:  J W Hoi; H K Kim; C J Fong; L Zweck; A H Hielscher
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Changes in Diffuse Optical Tomography Images During Early Stages of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Correlate with Tumor Response in Different Breast Cancer Subtypes.

Authors:  Mirella L Altoe; Kevin Kalinsky; Alessandro Marone; Hyun K Kim; Hua Guo; Hanina Hibshoosh; Mariella Tejada; Katherine D Crew; Melissa K Accordino; Meghna S Trivedi; Dawn L Hershman; Andreas H Hielscher
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Targeted imaging and inhibition of triple-negative breast cancer metastases by a PDGFRβ aptamer.

Authors:  Simona Camorani; Billy Samuel Hill; Francesca Collina; Sara Gargiulo; Maria Napolitano; Monica Cantile; Maurizio Di Bonito; Gerardo Botti; Monica Fedele; Antonella Zannetti; Laura Cerchia
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 11.556

4.  Diffuse optical spectroscopy for monitoring the responses of patients with breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Hong Liu; Ling Bo Xue; Yan Fang Yang; Tian Jiao Zhao; Yang Bai; Bu Yong Zhang; Jie Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  High-resolution optoacoustic imaging of tissue responses to vascular-targeted therapies.

Authors:  Katja Haedicke; Lilach Agemy; Murad Omar; Andrei Berezhnoi; Sheryl Roberts; Camila Longo-Machado; Magdalena Skubal; Karan Nagar; Hsiao-Ting Hsu; Kwanghee Kim; Thomas Reiner; Jonathan Coleman; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Avigdor Scherz; Jan Grimm
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 25.671

6.  Photoacoustic imaging in the second near-infrared window: a review.

Authors:  Paul Kumar Upputuri; Manojit Pramanik
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  A Novel Model Incorporating Tumor Stiffness, Blood Flow Characteristics, and Ki-67 Expression to Predict Responses After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Song Gao; Qiaojin Zheng; Ye Kang; Jianyi Li; Shuo Zhang; Cong Shang; Xueying Tan; Weidong Ren; Yan Ma
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the contralateral non-tumor-bearing breast assessed by diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Mirella L Altoe; Kevin Kalinsky; Alessandro Marone; Hyun K Kim; Hua Guo; Hanina Hibshoosh; Mariella Tejada; Katherine D Crew; Melissa K Accordino; Meghna S Trivedi; Dawn L Hershman; Andreas H Hielscher
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 6.466

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.