Literature DB >> 33364197

A Novel Model Incorporating Tumor Stiffness, Blood Flow Characteristics, and Ki-67 Expression to Predict Responses After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Jing Zhang1, Song Gao2, Qiaojin Zheng1, Ye Kang3, Jianyi Li4, Shuo Zhang5, Cong Shang1, Xueying Tan1, Weidong Ren1, Yan Ma1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ability of tumor stiffness, tumor blood flow, and Ki-67 expression alone or in combination in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 145 breast cancer patients treated with NACT. Tumor stiffness (maximum stiffness (Emax), mean stiffness (Emean)), blood score (BS), and their relative changes, were evaluated before (t0), during (t1-t5), and at the end of NACT (t6) by shear-wave elastography and optical imaging. Ki-67 expression was quantitatively evaluated by immunohistochemistry using core biopsy specimens obtained before NACT. Pathological responses were evaluated by residual cancer burden. The ability of tumor stiffness, BS, Ki-67, and predRCB-which combined ΔEmean (t2) (the relative changes in Emean after the second NACT cycle), BS2 (BS after the second NACT cycle), and Ki-67-in predicting tumor responses was compared using receiver operating characteristic curves and the Z-test.
RESULTS: Tumor stiffness and BS decreased during NACT. ΔEmean (t2), BS2, and Ki-67 had better predictive performance than other indexes in identifying a favorable response (AUC = 0.82, 0.81, and 0.80) and resistance responses (AUC = 0.85, 0.79, and 0.84), with no significant differences between the three (p > 0.05). PredRCB had better predictive performance than any parameter alone for a favorable response (AUC = 0.90) and resistance (AUC = 0.93).
CONCLUSION: Tumor stiffness, BS, and Ki-67 expression showed good and similar abilities for predicting the pathological response to NACT, and predRCB was a significantly better predictor than each index alone. These results may help design therapeutic strategies for breast cancer patients undergoing NACT.
Copyright © 2020 Zhang, Gao, Zheng, Kang, Li, Zhang, Shang, Tan, Ren and Ma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; blood flow; breast cancer; predictive value; shear-wave elastography

Year:  2020        PMID: 33364197      PMCID: PMC7753215          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.603574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   6.244


  36 in total

1.  18F-FDG PET-Derived Tumor Blood Flow Changes After 1 Cycle of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Predicts Outcome in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Olivier Humbert; Jean-Marc Riedinger; Jean-Marc Vrigneaud; Salim Kanoun; Inna Dygai-Cochet; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Michel Toubeau; Edouard Depardon; Maud Lassere; Simon Tisserand; Pierre Fumoleau; François Brunotte; Alexandre Cochet
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer patients during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Is shear wave elastography a useful tool in clinical routine?

Authors:  Anna Marie Maier; Jörg Heil; Aba Harcos; Hans-Peter Sinn; Geraldine Rauch; Lorenz Uhlmann; Christina Gomez; Anne Stieber; Annika Funk; Richard G Barr; André Hennigs; Fabian Riedel; Benedikt Schäfgen; Sarah Hug; Frederik Marmé; Christof Sohn; Michael Golatta
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 3.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer (unabridged version).

Authors:  M Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Mitch Dowsett; D Craig Allred; Karen L Hagerty; Sunil Badve; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Glenn Francis; Neil S Goldstein; Malcolm Hayes; David G Hicks; Susan Lester; Richard Love; Pamela B Mangu; Lisa McShane; Keith Miller; C Kent Osborne; Soonmyung Paik; Jane Perlmutter; Anthony Rhodes; Hironobu Sasano; Jared N Schwartz; Fred C G Sweep; Sheila Taube; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul Valenstein; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel Visscher; Thomas Wheeler; R Bruce Williams; James L Wittliff; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 4.  Imaging angiogenesis: applications and potential for drug development.

Authors:  Janet C Miller; Homer H Pien; Dushyant Sahani; A Gregory Sorensen; James H Thrall
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Determinants of resistance to chemotherapy and ionizing radiation in breast cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Athanasia Pavlopoulou; Yavuz Oktay; Konstantinos Vougas; Maria Louka; Constantinos E Vorgias; Alexandros G Georgakilas
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  LOX-mediated collagen crosslinking is responsible for fibrosis-enhanced metastasis.

Authors:  Thomas R Cox; Demelza Bird; Ann-Marie Baker; Holly E Barker; Melisa W-Y Ho; Georgina Lang; Janine T Erler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Clinical significance of Ki-67 in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer as a predictor for chemosensitivity and for prognosis.

Authors:  Reiki Nishimura; Tomofumi Osako; Yasuhiro Okumura; Mitsuhiro Hayashi; Nobuyuki Arima
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.239

8.  HIF-1α, TWIST-1 and ITGB-1, associated with Tumor Stiffness, as Novel Predictive Markers for the Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Shuo Zhang; Song Gao; Yan Ma; Xueying Tan; Ye Kang; Weidong Ren
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients with Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Provides Early Prediction of Pathological Response - A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Nara P Pereira; Carla Curi; Cynthia A B T Osório; Elvira F Marques; Fabiana B Makdissi; Katja Pinker; Almir G V Bitencourt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; E P Winer; A S Coates; R D Gelber; M Piccart-Gebhart; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  2 in total

1.  Individualized model for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: A multicenter study.

Authors:  Bei Qian; Jing Yang; Jun Zhou; Longqing Hu; Shoupeng Zhang; Min Ren; Xincai Qu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.055

2.  Evaluation of Monoexponential, Stretched-Exponential and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI Diffusion Models in Early Response Monitoring to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer-A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Zyad M Almutlaq; Daniel J Wilson; Sarah E Bacon; Nisha Sharma; Samuel Stephens; Tatendashe Dondo; David L Buckley
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 5.119

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.