Literature DB >> 14665900

The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal.

Stephen Boorjian1, Michael Lipkin, Marc Goldstein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We studied the impact of the interval from vasectomy to reversal and presence of sperm granuloma on outcomes of reversal.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 213 microsurgical vasectomy reversals performed by a single surgeon were stratified according to obstructive intervals of less than 5 years, 5 to 10 years, 10 to 15 years and greater than 15 years. The effects of obstructive interval on patency and pregnancy rates were assessed using multivariate logistical regression. The impact of sperm granuloma on patency and pregnancy was assessed using the chi-square test.
RESULTS: Patency did not change with increasing obstructive intervals as can be seen with 91% patency at less than 5 years, 88% at 5 to 10 years, 91% at 10 to 15 and 89% at greater than 15 years. There was no difference in pregnancy rates (89%, 82% or 86%) at obstructive intervals of 0 to 5, 5 to 10 or 10 to 15 years, respectively. Pregnancy rates were significantly lower (44%, p <0.05) with obstructive intervals greater than 15 years. Men with at least unilateral sperm granuloma had patency of 95% vs 78% without granulomas, a trend which did not quite reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). There was no difference in pregnancy rates with or without granulomas.
CONCLUSIONS: Vasectomy reversal patency rates are high regardless of time since vasectomy. Pregnancy rates are lower more than 15 years after vasectomy. Sperm granuloma had a favorable impact on patency. Our data indicate that for obstructive intervals less than 15 years vasectomy reversal yields much higher pregnancy rates than in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and that even for intervals greater than 15 years reversal outcomes equal or exceed those of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14665900     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000098652.35575.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  25 in total

1.  [Bladder cancer--what's new].

Authors:  J Gschwend
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [45 years of microsurgery in urology : Contemporary witnesses report with special reference to vasectomy reversal].

Authors:  Horst Oesterwitz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Factors predicting success after microsurgical vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Marco Cosentino; Maria F Peraza; Alvaro Vives; Josvany Sanchez; Daniel Moreno; Judith Perona; Gerardo Ortiz; Maria Alcoba; Eduardo Ruiz; Joaquim Sarquella
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Microsurgical vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Lindsey Herrel; Wayland Hsiao
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 5.  The evolution of vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  Ryan M Dickey; Alexander W Pastuszak; Tariq S Hakky; Aravind Chandrashekar; Ranjith Ramasamy; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Clinical observation of loupe-assisted intussusception vasoepididymostomy in the treatment of obstructive azoospermia (analysis of 49 case reports).

Authors:  Guo-Xi Zhang; Wen-Jun Bai; Ke-Xin Xu; Xiao-Feng Wang; Ji-Chuan Zhu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 7.  Current status of vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  J Ullrich Schwarzer; Heiko Steinfatt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Prognostic value of intraoperative parameters observed during vasectomy reversal for predicting postoperative vas patency and fertility.

Authors:  Stefan Hinz; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Wolf H Weiske; Carsten Kempkensteffen; Mark Schrader; Kurt Miller; Ahmed Magheli
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Vasoepididymostomy: an insight into current practice patterns.

Authors:  Ujval S Pathak; Adithya Balasubramanian; Jonathan A Beilan; Mohit Butaney; Alexander J Tatem; Nannan Thirumavalavan; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

10.  Preoperative factors influencing postoperative results after vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Yu Seob Shin; Sang Deuk Kim; Jong Kwan Park
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 5.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.