Literature DB >> 3299450

Involuntary sterilization in the United States: a surgical solution.

P R Reilly.   

Abstract

Although the eugenics movement in the United States flourished during the first quarter of the 20th Century, its roots lie in concerns over the cost of caring for "defective" persons, concerns that first became manifest in the 19th Century. The history of state-supported programs of involuntary sterilization indicates that this "surgical solution" persisted until the 1950s. A review of the archives of prominent eugenicists, the records of eugenic organizations, important legal cases, and state reports indicates that public support for the involuntary sterilization of insane and retarded persons was broad and sustained. During the early 1930s there was a dramatic increase in the number of sterilizations performed upon mildly retarded young women. This change in policy was a product of the Depression. Institutional officials were concerned that such women might bear children for whom they could not provide adequate parental care, and thus would put more demands on strained social services. There is little evidence to suggest that the excesses of the Nazi sterilization program (initiated in 1934) altered American programs. Data are presented here to show that a number of state-supported eugenic sterilization programs were quite active long after scientists had refuted the eugenic thesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Legal Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Nineteenth Century; Twentieth Century; Americas; Attitude; Behavior; Biology; Child Care--cost; Child Rearing; Developed Countries; Diseases; Economic Factors; Eugenics--history; Family Planning; Family Planning Policy; Female Sterilization; Financial Activities; Financing, Government; Genetics; Intelligence; Involuntary Fertility Control; Legislation--history; Male Sterilization; Mental Disorders; Mental Retardation; North America; Northern America; Personality; Policy; Population Policy; Psychological Factors; Public Assistance--cost; Resource Allocation; Social Policy; Sterilization, Sexual; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3299450     DOI: 10.1086/415404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q Rev Biol        ISSN: 0033-5770            Impact factor:   4.875


  3 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting success after microsurgical vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Marco Cosentino; Maria F Peraza; Alvaro Vives; Josvany Sanchez; Daniel Moreno; Judith Perona; Gerardo Ortiz; Maria Alcoba; Eduardo Ruiz; Joaquim Sarquella
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  The human rights of women with intellectual disability.

Authors:  Ashwin Roy; Ameeta Roy; Meera Roy
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Landscape of germline cancer predisposition mutations testing and management in pediatrics: Implications for research and clinical care.

Authors:  Shilpa A Shahani; Erin L Marcotte
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.569

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.