Literature DB >> 29423419

Zero-Adjective Contrast in Much-less Ellipsis: The Advantage for Parallel Syntax.

Katy Carlson1, Jesse A Harris2.   

Abstract

This paper explores the processing of sentences with a much less coordinator (I don't own a pink hat, much less a red one). This understudied ellipsis sentence, one of several focus-sensitive coordination structures, imposes syntactic and semantic conditions on the relationship between the correlate (a pink hat) and remnant (a red one). We present the case of zero-adjective contrast, in which an NP remnant introduces an adjective without an overt counterpart in the correlate (I don't own a hat, much less a red one). Although zero-adjective contrast could in principle ease comprehension by limiting the possible relationships between the remnant and correlate to entailment, we find that zero-adjective contrast is avoided in production and taxing in online processing. Results from several studies support a processing model in which syntactic parallelism is the primary guide for determining contrast in ellipsis structures, even when violating parallelism would assist in computing semantic relationships.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contrast; coordination; ellipsis; parallelism

Year:  2017        PMID: 29423419      PMCID: PMC5798495          DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1366530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 2327-3798            Impact factor:   2.331


  19 in total

1.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Potato not Pope: human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences.

Authors:  Nicole Y Y Wicha; Elizabeth A Bates; Eva M Moreno; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times.

Authors:  Jos J A Van Berkum; Colin M Brown; Pienie Zwitserlood; Valesca Kooijman; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Processing the noun phrase versus sentence coordination ambiguity: thematic information does not completely eliminate processing difficulty.

Authors:  John C J Hoeks; Petra Hendriks; Wietske Vonk; Colin M Brown; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

7.  Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: eye-tracking evidence from German.

Authors:  Pia Knoeferle; Matthew W Crocker
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference.

Authors:  G T Altmann; Y Kamide
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17

9.  The role of parallelism in the real-time processing of anaphora.

Authors:  Josée Poirier; Matthew Walenski; Lewis P Shapiro
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-06-01

10.  Keep it local (and final): Remnant preferences in "let alone" ellipsis.

Authors:  Jesse A Harris; Katy Carlson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.