| Literature DB >> 29416599 |
Tao Xu1,2, Anyou Zhu3, Meiqun Sun4, Jingzhu Lv5, Zhongqing Qian6,7, Xiaojing Wang8, Ting Wang6,7,9, Hongtao Wang6,7.
Abstract
Hepatitis B is one of the most common infectious diseases, which leads to public health problems in the world, especially in Asian counties. In recent years, extensive human genetic association studies have been carried out to identify susceptible genes and genetic polymorphisms to understand the genetic contributions to the disease progression of HBV infection. HLA-DQ gene variations have been reported to be associated with HBV infection/clearance, disease progression and the development of hepatitis B-related complications, including liver cirrhosis (LC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the results are either inconclusive or controversial. Therefore, to derive a more precise estimation of the association, a meta-analysis was performed. Our data revealed that the HLA-DQ alleles rs2856718-G, rs7453920-A and rs9275319-G were significantly associated with decreased risk of HBV infection and HBV natural clearance. Logistic regression analyses showed that HLA-DQ alleles rs9275572-A significantly increased HBV infection clearance, and decreased HBV natural clearance. However, rs2856718-G and rs9275572-A were not associated with development of cirrhosis. The HLA-DQ polymorphisms (rs2856718 and rs9275572) were associated with a decreased HBV-related HCC risk in all genetic models, but rs9272105-A increased the risk of HBV-related HCC. In addition, no significant association was observed between HLA-DQ rs9275319-G polymorphism and HBV-related HCC. These stratified analyses were limited due to relatively modest size of correlational studies. In future, further investigation on a large population and different ethnicities are warranted. Our findings contribute to the personalized care and prognosis in hepatitis B.Entities:
Keywords: HLA-DQ; Hepatitis B virus; Immunology; Polymorphism; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver cirrhosis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29416599 PMCID: PMC5787527 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.22941
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1The flow charts of literature search and study selection
Characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis
| Study | Year | Ethnicity | Subgroup | Genotyping method | Case | Control | No. of cases | No. of controls | Polymorphisms | NOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mbarek H [ | 2011 | Japanese | GWAS | GeneChip | CHB | non-HBV | 458 | 2056 | rs2856718; | 6 |
| 2011 | Japanese | First replication | Invader assay | CHB | non-HBV | 606 | 2023 | |||
| 2011 | Japanese | Second replication | TaqMan | CHB | non-HBV | 379 | 1539 | |||
| 2011 | Japanese | Third replication | TaqMan | CHB | non-HBV | 1226 | 879 | |||
| Hu LM [ | 2012 | Chinese | TaqMan | HBV Carriers; | HBV clearance | 2644 | 1344 | rs2856718; | 7 | |
| Li SP [ | 2012 | Chinese | GWAS Southern | Gene Chip | HCC | HBV positive | 1075 | 990 | rs9272105 | 7 |
| 2012 | Chinese | GWAS Central | Gene Chip | HCC | HBV positive | 500 | 500 | |||
| 2012 | Chinese | Validation 1 | iPLEX/TaqMan | HCC | HBV-positive | 2112 | 2208 | |||
| 2012 | Chinese | Validation 2 | iPLEX/TaqMan | HCC | HBV-positive | 1021 | 1491 | |||
| 2012 | Chinese | Replication | iPLEX/TaqMan | HCC | HBV-positive | 1298 | 1026 | |||
| Hu ZB [ | 2013 | Chinese | GWAS | GeneChip | HBV carriers | HBV clearance | 951 | 937 | rs7453920 | 6 |
| 2013 | Chinese | Replication Ia | iPLEX | HBV carriers | HBV clearance | 1248 | 1248 | rs7453920 | ||
| 2013 | Chinese | Replication Ib | TaqMan | HBV carriers | HBV clearance | 1000 | 1803 | rs7453920 | ||
| 2013 | Chinese | Replication IIa | iPLEX | HBV carriers | HBV clearance | 981 | 1417 | rs7453920 | ||
| 2013 | Chinese | Replication IIb | TaqMan | HBV carriers | HBV clearance | 1001 | 1205 | rs7453920 | ||
| Chen KM [ | 2013 | Chinese | TaqMan | HCC | CHB | 506 | 772 | rs9275572 | 8 | |
| Al-Qahtani AA [ | 2014 | Saudi Arabian | PCR-based genotyping/ | HBV carriers | Healthy controls, | 781 | 302, 587 | rs2856718; | 7 | |
| Zhang X [ | 2014 | Chinese | Flight mass spectrometry | HBV carriers | Healthy controls, | 792 | 507, 350 | rs2856718; | 8 | |
| Ji XW [ | 2014 | Chinese | Real-time PCR | HBV carriers | Healthy controls; | 2489 | 1342; 327 | rs2856718; | 8 | |
| Liao Y [ | 2014 | Chinese | HRM | chronic HBV carriers; | Healthy controls; | 677 | 237, 398 | rs7453920 | 8 | |
| Hou SH [ | 2015 | Chinese | TaqMan | HBV carriers | Healthy controls; | 310 | 316, 295 | rs9275572 | 8 | |
| Hou SH [ | 2015 | Chinese | TaqMan | HBV carriers | Healthy controls; | 310 | 316, 295 | rs9275319 | 8 | |
| Kim LH [ | 2015 | Korean | TaqMan | CHB; HCC | Population control samples | 958 | 2880 | rs9275319 | 7 | |
| Wen J [ | 2015 | Chinese | TaqMan | HCC | HBV persistent carriers | 1507 | 1560 | rs9272105; | 6 | |
| Liao Y [ | 2015 | Chinese | Tibetans | HRM | HBV carriers | HBV clearance | 422 | 486 | rs7453920 | 7 |
| Chinese | Uygurs | HRM | HBV carriers | HBV clearance | 195 | 235 | ||||
| Jiang DK [ | 2015 | Chinese | Shanghai | MassARRAY/TaqMan | LC | CHB | 440 | 1265 | rs9275319 | 6 |
| Chinese | Beijing | LC | CHB | 272 | 1336 | |||||
| Liu WX [ | 2016 | Chinese | Flight mass spectrometry | HBV carriers | Healthy controls; | 396 | 254, 175 | rs2856718; | 8 | |
| Fan JH [ | 2016 | Chinese | MassARRAY | HBV carriers | Healthy controls; | 397 | 238, 434 | rs9275319 | 8 | |
| Gao X [ | 2016 | Chinese | Flight mass spectrometry | HBV carriers | Healthy controls | 784 | 507 | rs2856718; | 8 | |
| Trinks [ | 2017 | Argentinean | Central areas | TaqMan | HBV carriers | Healthy controls; | 201 | 207, 318 | rs2856718; | 8 |
| 2017 | Argentinean | North-western areas | TaqMan | HBV carriers | 200 | 201, 313 | ||||
| Pereira VRZB [ | 2017 | Brazilian | TaqMan | CHB | Healthy controls | 210 | 210 | rs7453920 | 8 |
CHB: Chronic Hepatitis B; HBV: Hepatitis B Virus; HCC: Hepatocellular Carcinoma; LC: Liver Cirrhosis; AsC: Asymptomatic Carriers; NOS: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Figure 2Host HLA-DQ region polymorphisms influencing infection outcomes
Main results of the meta-analysis of the association between HLA-DQ rs2856718 polymorphism and HBV infection outcomes
| Comparison | Subgroup | Allele model | Heterozygous model | Homozygous model | Recessive model | Dominant model | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | ||||||||||||
| HBV infection vs. Control | Overall | 0.66 (0.60-0.73) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.66 (0.62-0.71) | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.46 (0.37-0.55) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.60 (0.50-0.72) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.59 (0.52-0.65) | 0.01 | <0.01 |
| Asian | 0.67 (0.60-0.75) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.70 (0.64-0.75) | 0.49 | <0.01 | 0.46 (0.37-0.58) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.58 (0.48-0.71) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.61 (0.55-0.69) | 0.03 | <0.01 | |
| Caucasian | 0.63 (0.50-0.78) | 0.08 | <0.01 | 0.46 (0.37-0.58) | 0.70 | <0.01 | 0.41 (0.24-0.70) | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.63 (0.38-1.06) | <0.01 | 0.08 | 0.48 (0.39-0.59) | 0.63 | <0.01 | |
| HBV infection vs. NC | Overall | 0.74 (0.67-0.82) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.63 (0.51-0.79) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.74 (0.70-0.78) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.74 (0.63-0.87) | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.62 (0.51-0.74) | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Asian | 0.78 (0.70-0.87) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.75 (0.66-0.87) | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.75 (0.71-0.80) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.74 (0.64-0.84) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.71 (0.61-0.83) | <0.01 | <0.01 | |
| Caucasian | 0.64 (0.56-0.73) | 0.64 | <0.01 | 0.41 (0.18-0.90) | <0.01 | 0.03 | 0.65 (0.57-0.70) | 0.56 | <0.01 | 0.72 (0.38-1.38) | <0.01 | 0.33 | 0.41 (0.26-0.65) | 0.02 | <0.01 | |
| LC vs. CHB | Chinese | 0.99 (0.84-1.17) | 0.99 | 0.88 | 1.03 (0.81-1.32) | 0.99 | 0.81 | 0.96 (0.67-1.34) | 0.99 | 0.78 | 0.94 (0.68-1.28) | 0.99 | 0.69 | 1.01 (0.80-1.27) | 0.99 | 0.93 |
| HCC vs. LC+CHB | Chinese | 0.80 (0.76-0.90) | 0.90 | <0.01 | 0.71 (0.63-0.81) | 0.85 | <0.01 | 0.74 (0.62-0.88) | 0.83 | <0.01 | 0.90 (0.77-1.06) | 0.52 | 0.20 | 0.72 (0.64-0.81) | 0.99 | <0.01 |
-*Because there was only one study with this genotype of rs2856718, the value could not be calculated.
Figure 3Forest plots for HLA-DQ rs2856718 polymorphism and HBV infection outcomes
A. HBV infection vs. Control (AA vs. AG+GG); B. HBV infection vs. NC (AA vs. AG+GG); C. LC vs. CHB (AA vs. AG+GG); D. HCC vs. LC+CHB (AA vs. AG+GG).
Main results of the meta-analysis of the association between HLA-DQ rs9275572 polymorphism and HBV infection outcomes
| Comparison | Subgroup | Allele model | Heterozygous model | Homozygous model | Recessive model | Dominant model | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | ||||||||||||
| HBV infection vs. Control | Overall | 0.68 (0.62-0.74) | 0.11 | <0.01 | 0.73 (0.65-0.82) | 0.34 | <0.01 | 0.45 (0.37-0.56) | 0.23 | <0.01 | 0.51 (0.42-0.62) | 0.41 | <0.01 | 0.66 (0.59-0.74) | 0.21 | <0.01 |
| Asian | 0.64 (0.54-0.71) | 0.34 | <0.01 | 0.68 (0.59-0.78) | 0.89 | <0.01 | 0.40 (0.31-0.52) | 0.35 | <0.01 | 0.47 (0.37-0.60) | 0.46 | <0.01 | 0.62 (0.54-0.71) | 0.55 | <0.01 | |
| Caucasian | 0.78 (0.66-0.91) | -* | <0.01 | 0.89 (0.71-1.13) | -* | 0.33 | 0.56 (0.40-0.78) | -* | <0.01 | 0.59 (0.43-0.81) | -* | <0.01 | 0.80 (0.64-0.99) | -* | 0.04 | |
| HBV infection vs. NC | Overall | 0.70 (0.62-0.79) | 0.61 | <0.01 | 0.65 (0.56-0.76) | 0.30 | <0.01 | 0.57 (0.44-0.76) | 0.99 | <0.01 | 0.67 (0.52-0.87) | 0.99 | <0.01 | 0.63 (0.55-0.73) | 0.47 | <0.01 |
| Asian | 0.66 (0.57-0.76) | 0.91 | <0.01 | 0.59 (0.49-0.71) | 0.92 | <0.01 | 0.57 (0.39-0.82) | 0.99 | <0.01 | 0.70 (0.49-1.00) | 0.99 | 0.05 | 0.59 (0.49-0.70) | 0.94 | <0.01 | |
| Caucasian | 0.78 (0.64-0.94) | -* | 0.01 | 0.82 (0.61-1.09) | -* | 0.17 | 0.58 (0.38-0.88) | -* | 0.01 | 0.65 (0.44-0.95) | -* | 0.03 | 0.76 (0.58-0.99) | -* | 0.05 | |
| LC vs. CHB | Chinese | 1.34 (1.14-1.56) | 0.99 | <0.01 | 0.97 (0.80-1.18) | 0.82 | 0.76 | 1.22 (0.83-1.80) | 0.82 | 0.31 | 1.25 (0.85-1.82) | 0.73 | 0.25 | 1.00 (0.83-1.21) | 0.96 | 0.97 |
| HCC vs. LC+CHB | Chinese | 0.71 (0.63-0.80) | 0.79 | <0.01 | 073 (0.64-0.84) | 0.55 | <0.01 | 0.49 (0.35-0.68) | 1.00 | <0.01 | 0.54 (0.39-0.76) | 0.99 | <0.01 | 0.69 (0.60-0.80) | 0.63 | <0.01 |
-*Because there was only one study with this genotype of rs9275572, the value could not be calculated.
Figure 4Forest plots for HLA-DQ rs9275572 polymorphism and HBV infection outcomes
A. HBV infection vs. Control (AA vs. AG+GG); B. HBV infection vs. NC (AA vs. AG+GG); C. LC vs. CHB (AA vs. AG+GG); D. HCC vs. LC+CHB (AA vs. AG+GG)
Figure 5Forest plots for HLA-DQ rs7453920 polymorphism and HBV infection outcomes
A. HBV infection vs. Control (AA vs. AG+GG); B. HBV infection vs. NC (AA vs. AG+GG).
Main results of the meta-analysis of the association between HLA-DQ rs7453920 polymorphism and HBV infection outcomes
| Comparison | Subgroup | Allele model | Heterozygous model | Homozygous model | Recessive model | Dominant model | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | ||||||||||||
| HBV infection vs. Control | Overall | 0.72 (0.62-0.82) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.76 (0.64-0.89) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.96 (0.82-1.12) | 0.12 | 0.58 | 0.99 (0.85-1.15) | 0.22 | 0.90 | 0.75 (0.63-0.89) | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Asian | 0.71 (0.59-0.85) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.75 (0.61-0.92) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.91 (0.75-1.11) | 0.13 | 0.34 | 0.91 (0.75-1.11) | 0.19 | 0.38 | 0.73 (0.59-0.91) | <0.01 | <0.01 | |
| Caucasian | 0.72 (0.60-0.87) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.77 (0.60-1.00) | 0.13 | 0.05 | 1.04 (0.81-1.35) | 0.19 | 0.75 | 1.11 (0.88-1.44) | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.78 (0.59-1.04) | 0.04 | 0.09 | |
| HBV infection vs. NC | Overall | 0.64 (0.40-1.02) | <0.01 | 0.06 | 0.62 (0.47-0.81) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.69 (0.35-1.37) | <0.01 | 0.29 | 0.79 (0.43-1.47) | <0.01 | 0.46 | 0.62 (0.45-0.85) | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Asian | 0.55 (0.46-0.65) | 0.42 | <0.01 | 0.54 (0.40-0.73) | 0.11 | <0.01 | 0.51 (0.20-1.30) | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.59 (0.24-1.46) | 0.17 | 0.26 | 0.54 (0.42-0.68) | 0.22 | <0.01 | |
| Caucasian | 0.76 (0.33-1.73) | <0.01 | 0.51 | 0.70 (0.45-1.08) | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.83 (0.33-2.08) | <0.01 | 0.70 | 0.96 (0.44-2.07) | 0.01 | 0.92 | 0.72 (0.42-1.24) | <0.01 | 0.24 | |
Main results of the meta-analysis of the association between HLA-DQ rs9275319 polymorphism and HBV infection outcomes
| Comparison | Subgroup | Allele model | Heterozygous model | Homozygous model | Recessive model | Dominant model | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | ||||||||||||
| HBV infection vs. Control | Overall | 0.68 (0.62-0.74) | 0.12 | <0.01 | 0.69 (0.62-0.77) | 0.35 | <0.01 | 0.50 (0.38-0.65) | 0.16 | <0.01 | 0.55 (0.42-0.72) | 0.18 | <0.01 | 0.66 (0.60-0.74) | 0.26 | <0.01 |
| Chinese | 0.69 (0.61-0.79) | 0.06 | <0.01 | 0.66 (0.57-0.77) | 0.27 | <0.01 | 0.66 (0.42-1.03) | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.71 (0.46-1.12) | 0.23 | 0.140 | 0.66 (0.57-0.76) | 0.13 | <0.01 | |
| Korean | 0.66 (0.8-0.76) | -* | <0.01 | 0.73 (0.62-0.86) | -* | <0.01 | 0.44 (0.31-0.62) | -* | <0.01 | 0.49 (0.35-0.68) | -* | <0.01 | 0.67 (0.57-0.78) | -* | <0.01 | |
| HBV infection vs. NC | Chinese | 0.64 (0.54-0.76) | 0.39 | <0.01 | 0.63 (0.51-0.77) | 0.78 | <0.01 | 0.52 (0.28-0.95) | 0.45 | 0.03 | 0.57 (0.37-1.04) | 0.45 | 0.07 | 0.62 (0.51-0.75) | 0.60 | <0.01 |
| HCC vs. LC+CHB | Overall | 0.99 (0.86-1.14) | 0.19 | 0.92 | 1.04 (0.44-1.21) | 0.18 | 0.67 | 0.81 (0.50-1.32) | 0.90 | 0.40 | 0.82 (0.51-1.32) | 0.88 | 0.41 | 1.01 (0.87-1.18) | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Chinese | 1.02 (0.86-1.20) | 0.09 | 0.84 | 1.07 (0.89-1.29) | 0.09 | 0.45 | 0.73 (0.37-1.43) | 0.90 | 0.36 | 0.72 (0.37-1.42) | 0.95 | 0.35 | 1.05 (0.88-1.25) | 0.08 | 0.62 | |
| Korean | 0.94 (0.72-1.21) | -* | 0.61 | 0.93 (0.67-1.28) | -* | 0.65 | 0.91 (0.46-1.82) | -* | 0.80 | 0.93 (0.47-1.85) | -* | 0.84 | 0.93 (0.68-1.25) | -* | 0.62 | |
-*Because there was only one study with this genotype of rs9275319, the value could not be calculated.
Figure 6Forest plots for HLA-DQ rs9275319 polymorphism and HBV infection outcomes
A. HBV infection vs. Control (AA vs. AG+GG); B. HBV infection vs. NC (AA vs. AG+GG); C. HCC vs. LC+CHB (AA vs. AG+GG).
Main results of the meta-analysis of the association between HLA-DQ rs9272105 polymorphism and HBV infection outcomes
| Comparison | Allele model | Heterozygous model | Homozygous model | Recessive model | Dominant model | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | |||||||||||
| HCC vs. CHB | 1.31 (1.25-1.37) | 0.54 | <0.01 | 1.11 (1.03-1.20) | 0.55 | 0.01 | 1.70 (1.56-1.86) | 0.49 | <0.01 | 1.59 (1.48-1.72) | 0.20 | <0.01 | 1.28 (1.19-1.37) | 0.69 | <0.01 |
Figure 7Forest plots for HLA-DQ rs9272105 polymorphism and HBV infection outcomes
HCC vs. LC+CHB (AA vs. AG+GG).