| Literature DB >> 29399631 |
Elmar W Tobi1,2, Roderick C Slieker1, René Luijk1,3, Koen F Dekkers1, Aryeh D Stein4, Kate M Xu3,5, P Eline Slagboom1, Erik W van Zwet3, L H Lumey1,6, Bastiaan T Heijmans1.
Abstract
Although it is assumed that epigenetic mechanisms, such as changes in DNA methylation (DNAm), underlie the relationship between adverse intrauterine conditions and adult metabolic health, evidence from human studies remains scarce. Therefore, we evaluated whether DNAm in whole blood mediated the association between prenatal famine exposure and metabolic health in 422 individuals exposed to famine in utero and 463 (sibling) controls. We implemented a two-step analysis, namely, a genome-wide exploration across 342,596 cytosine-phosphate-guanine dinucleotides (CpGs) for potential mediators of the association between prenatal famine exposure and adult body mass index (BMI), serum triglycerides (TG), or glucose concentrations, which was followed by formal mediation analysis. DNAm mediated the association of prenatal famine exposure with adult BMI and TG but not with glucose. DNAm at PIM3 (cg09349128), a gene involved in energy metabolism, mediated 13.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5 to 28%] of the association between famine exposure and BMI. DNAm at six CpGs, including TXNIP (cg19693031), influencing β cell function, and ABCG1 (cg07397296), affecting lipid metabolism, together mediated 80% (95% CI, 38.5 to 100%) of the association between famine exposure and TG. Analyses restricted to those exposed to famine during early gestation identified additional CpGs mediating the relationship with TG near PFKFB3 (glycolysis) and METTL8 (adipogenesis). DNAm at the CpGs involved was associated with gene expression in an external data set and correlated with DNAm levels in fat depots in additional postmortem data. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that epigenetic mechanisms mediate the influence of transient adverse environmental factors in early life on long-term metabolic health. The specific mechanism awaits elucidation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29399631 PMCID: PMC5792223 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aao4364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Phenotypic differences and famine exposure.
| 463 | 348 | |
| Age (years) [SD]+ | 58.0 [5.4] | 58.9 [0.5]*** |
| Male (%) | 43.0 | 46.0 |
| BMI1 [SD] | 27.0 [4.2] | 28.5 [5.0]*** |
| LDL-C2 [SD] | 3.42 [0.96] | 3.45 [0.97] |
| Triglycerides2 [SD] | 1.48 [0.86] | 1.68 [1.30]** |
| Glucose baseline3 [SD] | 5.32 [0.93] | 5.52 [1.19]* |
Nominal P value either *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 or ***P < 0.001 from a linear mixed-effects model with the denoted variable as the dependent variable and family identifier as random effect.
+Model included an additional random effect for exposure status to control for the difference in variance in age between groups.
1Model-applied correction for age and gender.
2Model-applied correction for age, gender, and statin used, and individuals who were nonfasting at examination were excluded (excluding two controls and five famine-exposed individuals).
3Model-applied correction for age and gender. Individuals who were nonfasting and had prediagnosed diabetes (thus receiving treatment) before the clinical examination were excluded (excluding 19 controls and 32 famine-exposed individuals).
Fig. 1Manhattan plots: Outcome genome-wide screens for potential mediators.
The −log(P value) is shown (y axis) for each CpG relative to its genomic locations (x axis) on the 22 autosomal chromosomes tested for (A) an EWAS on both famine exposure and BMI and (B) an EWAS on both famine exposure and serum TG.
Genome-wide screen for potential mediators: famine exposure and BMI.
| chr11:68607622 | 13.6 (2.6) | 1 | 6.7 × 10−14 | 2.3 × 10−8 | −0.2 | 0.19 | −4.0 | 1.7 × 10−16 | ( | ||
| chr21:43656587 | 65.9 (3.0) | 2 | 2.0 × 10−12 | 3.3 × 10−7 | −0.1 | 0.75 | 4.3 | 2.5 × 10−13 | ( | ||
| chr19:38704515 | 32.5 (6.1) | 3 | 2.2 × 10−10 | 4.3 × 10−5 | 0.3 | 0.50 | −8.9 | 1.3 × 10−11 | ( | ||
| chr17:17730094 | 53.2 (3.2) | 4 | 2.2 × 10−8 | 1.9 × 10−3 | −0.1 | 0.70 | 3.3 | 1.2 × 10−9 | ( | ||
| cg09349128 | chr22:50327986 | 39.0 (3.8) | 5 | 1.3 × 10−7 | 8.3 × 10−3 | −0.7 | 1.5 × 10−3 | −3.5 | 6.5 × 10−8 | ( | |
| chr11:68607675 | 20.4 (4.6) | 6 | 1.5 × 10−7 | 8.3 × 10−3 | −0.4 | 0.093 | −4.4 | 3.2 × 10−9 | ( | ||
| chr3:3152038 | 73.9 (4.1) | 7 | 2.1 × 10−7 | 0.01 | −0.3 | 0.18 | −3.4 | 5.8 × 10−9 | ( | ||
| chr11:68607737 | 16.1 (4.1) | 8 | 7.4 × 10−7 | 0.032 | −0.1 | 0.66 | −4.2 | 2.3 × 10−8 | ( | ||
| chr8:38586183 | 24.6 (3.9) | 9 | 1.7 × 10−7 | 0.064 | 1.3 | 1.7 × 10−7 | −0.4 | 0.63 | ( | ||
| chr12:54764265 | 68.9 (5.7) | 14 | 5.2 × 10−7 | 0.13 | 2.0 | 3.1 × 10−7 | 1.3 | 0.28 | ( | ||
*The estimate and (nominal) P value belonging to the EWAS for famine exposure (β = exposed − unexposed) or BMI (β/log(BMI)).
†Nearest gene within 100 kb.
‡The Illumina 450k array β value (ranging from 0 to 1) multiplied by 100 for easy interpretation. This is done throughout the presented work.
§The P value belonging to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test (χ2, df = 2) between a generalized estimating equations (GEE) model with and without both famine exposure and BMI.
¶The two CpGs identified in a previous EWAS on famine exposure ().
Mediation analysis: DNAm and the association between famine exposure and triglycerides.
| chr1:145441552 | 77.5 (4.3) | 6 | 2.6 × 10−5 | 4.8 × 10−3 | 2.3 × 10−11 | ( | 2.6 [0.7–4.8] | 0.005 | 28.0 [5.7–100] | 0.026 | ||
| chr6:43894639 | 60.4 (4.7) | 10 | 1.8 × 10−3 | 6.6 × 10−4 | 6.4 × 10−8 | ( | 2.3 [0.8–4.1] | 0.001 | 24.9 [7.5–100] | 0.021 | ||
| chr17:46022809 | 36.1 (3.4) | 12 | 3.5 × 10−3 | 7.1 × 10−4 | 6.0 × 10−8 | ( | 2.3 [0.9–4.2] | 0.001 | 25 [7.0–100] | 0.022 | ||
| chr1:90288099 | 64.8 (3.8) | 13 | 4.2 × 10−3 | 1.0 × 10−5 | 5.3 × 10−6 | 2.6 [1.1–4.5] | <0.001 | 28.0 [8.8–100] | 0.024 | |||
| chr21:43655316 | 26.9 (3.8) | 14 | 0.021 | 5.1 × 10−3 | 1.9 × 10−7 | ( | 1.9 [0.6–3.6] | 0.005 | 20.5 [4.6–97.4] | 0.027 | ||
| chr22:39759864 | 40.2 (4.3) | 15 | 0.032 | 3.9 × 10−3 | 1.5 × 10−7 | ( | 1.8 [0.5–3.5] | 0.007 | 19.6 [3.6–88.3] | 0.026 |
*Nearest gene within 100 kb.
†The Illumina 450k array β value (ranging from 0 to 1) multiplied by 100 for easy interpretation.
‡This is the estimate and CI based on 10K Monte Carlo simulations of the indirect effect or mediation effect, which is often referred to as the “a × b” effect.
§The percentage of the total exposure-phenotype relationship explained by the indirect (mediated) effect as based on 10K Monte Carlo simulations.
Fig. 2Manhattan plot: Outcome genome-wide screen for potential mediators.
The −log(P value) (y axis) for each CpG relative to its genomic locations (x axis) on the 22 autosomal chromosomes for the EWAS for both early famine exposure and serum TG.