Jane Maddock1, Wahyu Wulaningsih1, Juan Castillo Fernandez2, George B Ploubidis3, Alissa Goodman3, Jordana Bell2, Diana Kuh1, Rebecca Hardy1. 1. MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. 3. Centre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Body size, nutrition and socioeconomic position (SEP) in early life have been associated with a wide range of long-term health effects. Epigenetics is one possible mechanism through which these early life exposures can impact later life health. We conducted a systematic review examining the observational evidence for the impact of body size, nutrition and SEP in early life on the epigenome in humans. METHODS: This systematic review is registered with the PROSPERO database (registration number: CRD42016050193). Three datasets were simultaneously searched using Ovid and the resulting studies were evaluated by at least two independent reviewers. Studies measuring epigenetic markers either at the same time as, or after, the early life exposure and have a measure of body size, nutrition or SEP in early life (up to 12 years), written in English and from a community-dwelling participants were included. RESULTS: We identified 90 eligible studies. Seventeen of these papers examined more than one early life exposure of interest. Fifty six papers examined body size, 37 nutrition and 17 SEP. All of the included papers examined DNA methylation (DNAm) as the epigenetic marker. Overall there was no strong evidence for a consistent association between these early life variables in DNAm which may be due to the heterogeneous study designs, data collection methods and statistical analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Despite these inconclusive results, the hypothesis that the early life environment can impact DNAm, potentially persisting into adult life, was supported by some studies and warrants further investigation. We provide recommendations for future studies.
BACKGROUND: Body size, nutrition and socioeconomic position (SEP) in early life have been associated with a wide range of long-term health effects. Epigenetics is one possible mechanism through which these early life exposures can impact later life health. We conducted a systematic review examining the observational evidence for the impact of body size, nutrition and SEP in early life on the epigenome in humans. METHODS: This systematic review is registered with the PROSPERO database (registration number: CRD42016050193). Three datasets were simultaneously searched using Ovid and the resulting studies were evaluated by at least two independent reviewers. Studies measuring epigenetic markers either at the same time as, or after, the early life exposure and have a measure of body size, nutrition or SEP in early life (up to 12 years), written in English and from a community-dwelling participants were included. RESULTS: We identified 90 eligible studies. Seventeen of these papers examined more than one early life exposure of interest. Fifty six papers examined body size, 37 nutrition and 17 SEP. All of the included papers examined DNA methylation (DNAm) as the epigenetic marker. Overall there was no strong evidence for a consistent association between these early life variables in DNAm which may be due to the heterogeneous study designs, data collection methods and statistical analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Despite these inconclusive results, the hypothesis that the early life environment can impact DNAm, potentially persisting into adult life, was supported by some studies and warrants further investigation. We provide recommendations for future studies.
Authors: Heather H Burris; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Andrea Baccarelli; Letizia Tarantini; Caroline E Boeke; Ken Kleinman; Augusto A Litonjua; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Matthew W Gillman Journal: J Dev Orig Health Dis Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.401
Authors: Pei-Chien Tsai; Jenny Van Dongen; Qihua Tan; Gonneke Willemsen; Lene Christiansen; Dorret I Boomsma; Tim D Spector; Ana M Valdes; Jordana T Bell Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet Date: 2015-11-13 Impact factor: 1.587
Authors: Andrea Rossnerova; Elena Tulupova; Nana Tabashidze; Jana Schmuczerova; Miroslav Dostal; Pavel Rossner; Hans Gmuender; Radim J Sram Journal: Mutat Res Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 2.433
Authors: Heather H Burris; Andrea A Baccarelli; Hyang-Min Byun; Alejandra Cantoral; Allan C Just; Ivan Pantic; Maritsa Solano-Gonzalez; Katherine Svensson; Marcela Tamayo y Ortiz; Yan Zhao; Robert O Wright; Martha M Téllez-Rojo Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: M-H Tao; C Marian; P G Shields; N Potischman; J Nie; S S Krishnan; D L Berry; B V Kallakury; C Ambrosone; S B Edge; M Trevisan; J Winston; J L Freudenheim Journal: J Dev Orig Health Dis Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.401
Authors: A Soubry; Sk Murphy; Z Huang; A Murtha; Jm Schildkraut; Rl Jirtle; F Wang; J Kurtzberg; W Demark-Wahnefried; Mr Forman; C Hoyo Journal: Clin Epigenetics Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 6.551
Authors: Sarah U Morton; Brian J Leyshon; Eleonora Tamilia; Rutvi Vyas; Michaela Sisitsky; Imran Ladha; John B Lasekan; Matthew J Kuchan; P Ellen Grant; Yangming Ou Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 5.435