| Literature DB >> 29394922 |
Caitlin E Blakeley1, Maria I Van Rompay1, Nicole S Schultz1, Jennifer M Sacheck2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between muscle strength and cardiometabolic risk factors in youth, and the potential influence of vitamin D status on this relationship, is not well understood. This study examined associations between muscle strength and dyslipidemia, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], and weight status in diverse schoolchildren.Entities:
Keywords: 25(OH)D; BMI z-score; Blood lipids; Cardiometabolic risk factors; Grip strength
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29394922 PMCID: PMC5797355 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-018-0998-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Sociodemographic, behavioral, and health status characteristics by tertile of grip strength in schoolchildren aged 9-14 (N = 350)
| Tertiles of grip strength | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low ( | Moderate ( | High (N = 117) | ||
| Grip strength (kg)a | −0.95 (− 1.32, − 0.66) | −0.02 (− 0.23, 0.15) | 1.04 (0.67, 1.36) | |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 60 (51.7) | 61 (52.1) | 56 (47.9) | 0.77 |
| Female | 56 (48.3) | 56 (47.9) | 61 (52.1) | |
| Age (y) | 11.4 ± 1.3 | 11.1 ± 1.3 | 11.2 ± 1.3 | 0.12 |
| Race/ethnicity | ||||
| White/Caucasian | 48 (41.4) | 51 (43.6) | 54 (46.2) | 0.64 |
| Black/African American | 13 (11.2) | 15 (12.8) | 22 (18.8) | |
| Hispanic/Latino | 27 (23.3) | 28 (23.9) | 19 (16.2) | |
| Asian | 7 (6.0) | 7 (6.0) | 6 (5.1) | |
| Multiracial/Other | 21 (18.1) | 16 (13.7) | 16 (13.7) | |
| Pubertal statusb | ||||
| Pre-puberty/early puberty | 80 (69.0) | 78 (66.7) | 75 (64.1) | 0.73 |
| Late puberty/post-puberty | 36 (31.0) | 39 (33.3) | 42 (35.9) | |
| Free/reduced price lunch | ||||
| Yes | 75 (64.7) | 84 (71.8) | 75 (64.1) | 0.38 |
| No | 41 (35.3) | 33 (28.2) | 42 (35.9) | |
| Sedentary timec | ||||
| < 2 h/day | 43 (37.4) | 48 (41.0) | 53 (45.7) | 0.44 |
| ≥ 2 h/day | 72 (62.6) | 69 (59.0) | 63 (54.3) | |
| Weight (kg) | 63.3 ± 18.4 | 47.0 ± 11.0 | 42.8 ± 10.2 | < 0.0001 |
| Height (cm) | 155 ± 11.7 | 149 ± 9.4 | 150 ± 11.2 | < 0.0001 |
| BMIz d | 1.7 (1.3, 2.2) | 0.9 (0.4, 1.4) | 0.2 (−0.3, 0.8) | < 0.0001 |
| Weight Status | ||||
| Normal weight | 17 (14.7) | 67 (57.3) | 96 (82.1) | < 0.0001 |
| Overweight/obese | 99 (85.3) | 50 (42.7) | 21 (18.0) | |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 45.3 ± 11.4 | 50.9 ± 12.6 | 50.7 ± 9.6 | 0.0001 |
| HDL-C statuse | ||||
| Borderline/low | 65 (56.0) | 49 (41.9) | 30 (25.6) | < 0.0001 |
| Normal | 51 (44.0) | 68 (58.1) | 87 (74.4) | |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL)d | 69.0 (52.0, 96.5) | 63.0 (47.0, 90.0) | 62.0 (49.0, 77.0) | 0.07 |
| Triglyceride statusf | ||||
| Normal | 80 (69.0) | 86 (73.5) | 96 (82.1) | 0.06 |
| Borderline/high | 36 (31.0) | 31 (26.5) | 21 (18.0) | |
| Serum 25(OH)D (ng/mL) | 21.9 ± 6.8 | 22.1 ± 6.1 | 22.6 ± 6.7 | 0.71 |
| Vitamin D statusg | ||||
| Deficient | 43 (37.1) | 42 (35.9) | 41 (35.0) | 0.96 |
| Insufficient | 58 (50.0) | 63 (53.9) | 63 (53.9) | |
| Sufficient | 15 (12.9) | 12 (10.3) | 13 (11.1) | |
Differences between tertiles of grip strength were determined using chi-square test and ANOVA. Data are mean ± standard deviation or n (%), unless otherwise stated; level of significance was p < 0.05
Abbreviations: BMIz BMI z-score, HDL-C HDL-cholesterol, 25(OH)D 25-hydroxyvitamin D
aTertiles of grip strength are standardized for age, sex, and body weight and are the median (IQR)
bLate puberty/post-puberty defined as reported voice change (male) or menarche (female)
cSedentary time defined as the number of hours per day spent watching television, videos, and using a computer
dDifferences between tertiles of grip strength were determined using the Kruskal Wallis test and data are the median (IQR)
eBorderline/Low defined as ≤45 mg/dL; normal defined as > 45 mg/dL
fNormal defined as < 75 mg/dL for children ≤9 years and < 90 mg/dL for children older than 9 years; borderline/high defined as ≥75 mg/dL for children ≤9 years and ≥90 mg/dL for children older than 9 years
gDeficient defined as < 20 ng/mL; insufficient defined as ≥20 and < 30 ng/mL; sufficient defined as ≥30 ng/mL
Odds ratios for cardiometabolic risk factors and vitamin D deficiency with a moderate or high grip strength relative to a low grip strength (N = 350)
| Low | Moderate | High | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||
| Borderline/Low HDL-C ( | ||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.58 (0.35, 0.98) | 0.28 (0.16, 0.48) | < 0.0001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.57 (0.34, 0.98) | 0.28 (0.16, 0.50) | < 0.0001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.19 (0.64, 2.22) | 0.98 (0.47, 2.04) | 0.93 |
| Model 4 | 1.00 | 0.57 (0.33, 0.97) | 0.28 (0.16, 0.49) | < 0.0001 |
| Borderline/High Triglycerides ( | ||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.79 (0.44, 1.40) | 0.47 (0.25, 0.88) | 0.02 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.80 (0.44, 1.46) | 0.48 (0.25, 0.92) | 0.03 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.36 (0.69, 2.68) | 1.24 (0.54, 2.82) | 0.62 |
| Model 4 | 1.00 | 0.75 (0.41, 1.39) | 0.44 (0.23, 0.86) | 0.02 |
| Overweight/Obese ( | ||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.12 (0.06, 0.22) | 0.04 (0.02, 0.07) | < 0.0001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.11 (0.06, 0.21) | 0.03 (0.01, 0.06) | < 0.0001 |
| Model 3 | – | – | – | – |
| Model 4 | 1.00 | 0.10 (0.05 0.20) | 0.03 (0.01, 0.06) | < 0.0001 |
| Vitamin D Deficient ( | ||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.03 (0.62, 1.70) | 0.95 (0.57, 1.56) | 0.82 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.01 (0.60, 1.70) | 0.90 (0.53, 1.52) | 0.68 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.60 (0.90, 2.85) | 1.90 (0.99, 3.65) | 0.06 |
| Model 4 | – | – | – | – |
Data are odds ratios from logistic regression models. Tertiles of grip strength are standardized for age, sex, and body weight. N represents the number of participants with that risk factor
Abbreviation: HDL-C HDL-cholesterol
Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex
Model 2 was additionally adjusted for pubertal status, sedentary time, free/reduced-price lunch, and race/ethnicity
Model 3 was further adjusted for BMIz
Model 4 was adjusted for the covariates in model 2 as well as for vitamin D status. BMIz was not included in the model
Odds ratios for cardiometabolic risk factors by vitamin D status (N = 350)
| Deficient | Insufficient | Sufficient | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||
| Borderline/Low HDL-C ( | ||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.78 (0.49, 1.24) | 0.79 (0.38, 1.64) | 0.34 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.66 (0.40, 1.09) | 0.61 (0.28, 1.33) | 0.25 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.77 (0.45, 1.33) | 0.93 (0.40, 2.17) | 0.88 |
| Borderline/High Triglycerides ( | ||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.89 (0.53, 1.49) | 0.38 (0.14, 1.06) | 0.11 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.66 (0.38, 1.16) | 0.26 (0.09, 0.74) | 0.046 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.73 (0.40, 1.30) | 0.31 (0.10, 0.93) | 0.13 |
| Overweight/obese ( | ||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.68 (0.43, 1.09) | 0.55 (0.27, 1.15) | 0.06 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.67 (0.41, 1.09) | 0.53 (0.25, 1.15) | 0.08 |
| Model 3 | – | – | – | |
Data are odds ratios from logistic regression models. N represents the number of participants with that risk factor
Abbreviation: HDL-C HDL-cholesterol
Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex
Model 2 was additionally adjusted for pubertal status, sedentary time, free/reduced-price lunch, and race/ethnicity
Model 3 was further adjusted for BMIz