Sajjad Rostamzadeh1, Mahnaz Saremi2, Shahram Vosoughi3, Bruce Bradtmiller4, Leila Janani5, Ali Asghar Farshad1, Fereshteh Taheri1. 1. Occupational Health Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Workplace Health Promotion Research Center, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Occupational Health Research Center, Faculty of Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Hemmat Highway, Tehran, Iran. vosoughi.sh@iums.ac.ir. 4. Anthrotech, Inc, OH, Yellow Springs, USA. 5. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of hand-forearm anthropometric dimensions on handgrip and pinch strengths among 7-18 years children and adolescents and to investigate the extent to which these variables can be used to predict hand strength. METHODS: Four types of hand strengths including handgrip, tip to tip, key, and three-jaw chuck pinches were measured in 2637 healthy children and adolescents (1391 boys and 1246 girls) aged 7-18 years using standard adjustable Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer and pinch gauge. A set of 17 hand-forearm anthropometric dimensions were also measured with an accurate digital caliper and tape measure. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the hand strengths of boys and girls up to the age of 10 years. Gender related differences in handgrip and pinches were observed from the age of 11 years onwards, with boys always being stronger. The dominant hand was stronger than the non-dominant hand (8% for handgrip and by about 10% for all three types of pinches). The strongest correlations were found between the hand length and hand strengths (r > 0.83 for handgrip and three all pinches; p < 0.001, 2-tailed). Based on the partial least squares (PLS) analysis, 8 out of 17 anthropometric indices including hand length, hand circumference, thumb length, index finger length, middle finger length, and forearm length had considerable loadings in the PLS analysis, which together accounted for 46% of the total variance. CONCLUSIONS: These results may be used by health professionals in clinical settings as well as by designers to create ergonomic hand tools.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of hand-forearm anthropometric dimensions on handgrip and pinch strengths among 7-18 years children and adolescents and to investigate the extent to which these variables can be used to predict hand strength. METHODS: Four types of hand strengths including handgrip, tip to tip, key, and three-jaw chuck pinches were measured in 2637 healthy children and adolescents (1391 boys and 1246 girls) aged 7-18 years using standard adjustable Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer and pinch gauge. A set of 17 hand-forearm anthropometric dimensions were also measured with an accurate digital caliper and tape measure. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the hand strengths of boys and girls up to the age of 10 years. Gender related differences in handgrip and pinches were observed from the age of 11 years onwards, with boys always being stronger. The dominant hand was stronger than the non-dominant hand (8% for handgrip and by about 10% for all three types of pinches). The strongest correlations were found between the hand length and hand strengths (r > 0.83 for handgrip and three all pinches; p < 0.001, 2-tailed). Based on the partial least squares (PLS) analysis, 8 out of 17 anthropometric indices including hand length, hand circumference, thumb length, index finger length, middle finger length, and forearm length had considerable loadings in the PLS analysis, which together accounted for 46% of the total variance. CONCLUSIONS: These results may be used by health professionals in clinical settings as well as by designers to create ergonomic hand tools.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adolescents; Anthropometry; Handgrip; Partial Least Squares (PLS); Pinch
Authors: D D Cohen; C Voss; M J D Taylor; D M Stasinopoulos; A Delextrat; G R H Sandercock Journal: Acta Paediatr Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 2.299
Authors: Willeke A van den Beld; Gitty A C van der Sanden; Rob C A Sengers; André L M Verbeek; Fons J M Gabreëls Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Joris J W Ploegmakers; Ann M Hepping; Jan H B Geertzen; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Martin Stevens Journal: J Physiother Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 7.000