| Literature DB >> 32351917 |
Lucia Pacifico1, Francesco Massimo Perla1, Gianmarco Andreoli1, Rosangela Grieco1, Pasquale Pierimarchi2, Claudio Chiesa2.
Abstract
Background: Recent studies in adult non-elderly and elderly individuals have reported a link between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and sarcopenia. Nonetheless, whether this relationship would be found outside these populations it is still unknown. Hence, we evaluated the relationship between NAFLD and skeletal muscle mass in children and adolescents with overweight/obesity.Entities:
Keywords: NAFLD; NASH; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; muscle mass; youths
Year: 2020 PMID: 32351917 PMCID: PMC7174581 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.00158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.418
Characteristics of study population according to tertiles of RMM.
| Number of subjects | 78 | 75 | 81 | |
| Age, years | 11.3 (2.3) | 11.5 (2.8) | 12.5 (3.0) | 0.06 |
| Male sex, | 38 (48.7) | 33 (44.0) | 61 (75.3) | 0.001 |
| Prepubertal status, | 15 (19.2) | 16 (21.3) | 14 (17.2) | 0.26 |
| Weight, kg | 65.0 (21.0) | 59.3 (22.1) | 64.1 (21.1) | 0.21 |
| Height, cm | 149.7 (14.4) | 151.7 (17.4) | 158.9 (18.0) | 0.01 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.3 (4.5) | 24.7 (3.7) | 24.6 (3.3) | <0.0001 |
| BMI-SD score | 2.13 (0.40) | 1.70 (0.39) | 1.60 (0.39) | <0.0001 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 91.2 (13.2) | 84.8 (14.0) | 84.6 (12.0) | 0.002 |
| Systolic BP, mmHg | 111 (11) | 111 (9) | 112 (13) | 0.81 |
| Diastolic BP, mmHg | 69 (9) | 68 (8) | 69 (9) | 0.82 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 170 (39) | 177 (50) | 163 (41) | 0.19 |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 46 (13) | 47 (12) | 49 (10) | 0.17 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 97(72-141) | 91 (65-128) | 76 (52–123) | 0.031 |
| TG/HDL-C ratio | 2.1 (1.3-3.6) | 1.9 (1.2-3.3) | 1.6 (0.9-2.8) | 0.029 |
| AST, U/L | 25 (20–34) | 25 (20–30) | 23 (19–29) | 0.22 |
| ALT, U/L | 25 (17–47) | 22 (15–35) | 20 (15–32) | 0.15 |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 4.8 (0.8) | 4.8 (0.45) | 4.8 (0.39) | 0.84 |
| Insulin, μU/mL | 18 (12–24) | 14 (9–19) | 13 (9–18) | 0.004 |
| HOMA-IR | 3.7 (2.5-4.8) | 2.8 (1.9-3.9) | 2.8 (2.0-4.0) | 0.015 |
| Total body fat mass, kg | 28.0 (10.0) | 22.8 (9.0) | 19.0 (5.9) | <0.0001 |
| Total lean body mass, kg | 31.4 (9.6) | 32.5 (12.7) | 39.6 (14.6) | <0.0001 |
| RMM, % | 53.0 (3.3) | 58.9 (1.5) | 66.9 (4.8) | <0.0001 |
| ASM, kg | 15.1 (4.36) | 15.5 (7.0) | 20.7 (7.94) | <0.0001 |
| ASM/weight index, % | 24.5 (1.73) | 26.2 (2.86) | 30.8 (7.42) | <0.0001 |
| ASM/ht2 | 6.7 (1.0) | 6.4 (1.6) | 7.6 (2.0) | 0.001 |
| NAFLD, | 43 (55.2) | 25 (33.3) | 27 (33.3) | 0.006 |
RMM, relative muscle mass; BMI, body mass index; BMI-SDS, BMI-SD score; BP, blood pressure; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle mass.
Tertile I, RMM: < 56.72; tertile II, RMM: 56.72–61.99; tertile III, RMM: > 61.99.
Results are expressed as n (%), mean (SD) or median (interquartile range).
Age-, gender, and pubertal status- adjusted linear regression coefficients between RMM and clinical variables.
| Waist circumference, cm | −0.320 (-0.387,−0.253) | −0.327 (-0.414,−0.240) |
| Systolic BP, mmHg | −0.081 (-0.167, 0.006) | −0.175 (-0.290,−0.060) |
| Diastolic BP, mmHg | −0.101 (-0.199,−0.002) | −0.107 (-0.261, 0.047) |
| ALT | −0.035 (-0.060,−0.009) | −0.032 (-0.061,−0.002) |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 0.057 (-0.13, 0.127) | 0.173 (0.07, 0.278) |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | −0.014 (-0.25,−0.002) | −0.015 (-0.029,−0.001) |
| TG/HDL-C ratio | −0.454 (-0.78,−0.12) | −0.500 (-0.87,−0.13) |
| Glucose | −0.307 (-1.76, 1.15) | −0.903 (-2.54, 0.74) |
| Insulin | −0.136 (-0.204,−0.067) | −0.125 (-0.197,−0.052) |
| HOMA-IR | −0.396 (-0.632,−0.161) | −0.346 (-0.585,−0.108) |
RMM, relative muscle mass; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; CI, confidence interval; BP, blood pressure; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance.
P < 0.05;
P < 0.01;
P < 0.0001.
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its individual components according to RMM tertiles among the study population.
| Central obesity, | 62.8 (52.1-73.5) | 34.6 (23.8-45.4) | 13.6 (6.1-21.1) | <0.0001 |
| Elevated BP, | 29.5 (19.4-39.6) | 17.3 (8.7-25.9) | 27.1 (17.4-36.8) | 0.75 |
| High TG, | 35.9 (25.3-46.5) | 21.3 (12.0-30.6) | 21.0 (12.1-29.9) | 0.033 |
| Low HDL-C, | 38.5 (27.7-49.3) | 20.0 (11.0-29.0) | 19.7 (11.0-28.4) | 0.008 |
| Glucose ≥ 5.6 mmol/L, | 1.3 | 4.0 (1.4-11.1) | 3.7 (1.27-10.3) | 0.36 |
| Insulin resistance, | 70.5 (60.4-80.6) | 52.0 (35.0-69.0) | 51.8 (40.9-62.7) | 0.023 |
| NAFLD, | 55.2 (32.9-70.5) | 33.3 (22.6-44.0) | 33.3 (23.1-43.5) | 0.006 |
| Metabolic syndrome, | 29.5 (19.3-39.7) | 12.0 (4.6-19.3) | 3.7 (1.3-10.3) | <0.0001 |
RMM, relative muscle mass; CI, confidence interval; BP, blood pressure; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
For these percentages, the exact 95% CI was calculated using the Wilson method.
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of the lowest tertile of RMM for NAFLD.
| Adjusted model 1 | 2.80 (1.57-5.02) | 1.00 (referent) | 0.001 |
| Adjusted model 2 | 2.18 (1.17-4.07) | 1.00 (referent) | 0.014 |
| Adjusted model 3 | 2.18 (1.13-4.18) | 1.00 (referent) | 0.019 |
| Adjusted model 4 | 2.20 (1.19-4.05) | 1.00 (referent) | 0.012 |
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of the lowest tertile of ASM/weight index for NAFLD.
| Adjusted model 1 | 2.99 (1.41-6.31) | 1.00 (referent) | 0.004 |
| Adjusted model 2 | 2.29 (1.04-5.06) | 1.00 (referent) | 0.04 |
| Adjusted model 3 | 2.33 (1.01-5.40) | 1.00 (referent) | 0.048 |
| Adjusted model 4 | 2.54 (1.16-5.58) | 1.00 (referent) | 0.02 |
Model 1: adjusted for age, gender and pubertal status; Model 2: adjusted for age, gender, pubertal status, and central obesity; Model 3: adjusted for age, gender, pubertal status, central obesity, high blood pressure, elevated triglycerides, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and insulin resistance; Model 4: adjusted for age, gender, pubertal status and MetS.
CI, confidence interval.