Literature DB >> 31901111

Cell number considerations for blastocyst transfer in younger patients.

Zhiren Liu1, Mingting Jiang2, Linyun He1, Yun Liu3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of the cell number at day 3 in blastocyst selection.
DESIGN: Observational, retrospective, single-center clinical study. PATIENT(S): In part 1, 1211 single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT) cycles were identified and reviewed. All the cycles were conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles and the first embryo transfer cycles. Most of patients had a risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and were young. In part 2, 864 IVF-derived blastocysts from 292 infertile couples underwent trophectoderm (TE) biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). INTERVENTION(S): No patient intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The first part was an analysis of the correlation between the cell number at day 3 and live birth rate (LBR) after SVBT, and the second part was an analysis of the correlation between the cell number at day 3 and euploid rate (ER) of blastocysts. RESULT(S): In part 1, after correcting for the effects of other confounders, the cell number at day 3 had no significant effect on the LBR (OR 1.001, 95% CI 0.938-1.068). In part 2, after correcting for the effects of other confounders, the cell number at day 3 had no significant effect on the ER (OR 0.960, 95% CI 0.866-1.063). CONCLUSION(S): When the vitrified-warmed blastocysts obtained by conventional IVF are transferred into young patients, the cell number at day 3 is not a strong predictor of the LBR. In addition, the cell number at day 3 is not a strong predictor of ER of IVF-derived blastocysts too.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blastocyst selection; Cell number; Euploid rate; Live birth rate

Year:  2020        PMID: 31901111      PMCID: PMC7125267          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01681-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  33 in total

1.  Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model.

Authors:  E Van Royen ; K Mangelschots; D De Neubourg ; I Laureys; G Ryckaert; J Gerris
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the Cryotop method.

Authors:  Masashige Kuwayama
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Trophectoderm morphology predicts outcomes of pregnancy in vitrified-warmed single-blastocyst transfer cycle in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Xiaojiao Chen; Junqiang Zhang; Xun Wu; Shanren Cao; Lin Zhou; Ying Wang; Xin Chen; Jin Lu; Chun Zhao; Minjian Chen; Xiufeng Ling
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The optimum number of oocytes in IVF treatment: an analysis of 2455 cycles in China.

Authors:  Jingjuan Ji; Yusheng Liu; Xian Hong Tong; Lihua Luo; Jinlong Ma; Zijiang Chen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.

Authors:  Maria Giulia Minasi; Alessandro Colasante; Teresa Riccio; Alessandra Ruberti; Valentina Casciani; Filomena Scarselli; Francesca Spinella; Francesco Fiorentino; Maria Teresa Varricchio; Ermanno Greco
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Daimin Wei; Jia-Yin Liu; Yun Sun; Yuhua Shi; Bo Zhang; Jian-Qiao Liu; Jichun Tan; Xiaoyan Liang; Yunxia Cao; Ze Wang; Yingying Qin; Han Zhao; Yi Zhou; Haiqin Ren; Guimin Hao; Xiufeng Ling; Junzhao Zhao; Yunshan Zhang; Xiujuan Qi; Lin Zhang; Xiaohui Deng; Xiaoli Chen; Yimin Zhu; Xiaohong Wang; Li-Feng Tian; Qun Lv; Xiang Ma; Heping Zhang; Richard S Legro; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  D K Gardner; M Lane; J Stevens; T Schlenker; W B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Birth of nine normal healthy babies following transfer of blastocysts derived from human single-pronucleate zygotes.

Authors:  Fumiaki Itoi; Yukiko Asano; Masashi Shimizu; Hiroyuki Honnma; Yasutaka Murata
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system.

Authors:  Yamileth Motato; María José de los Santos; María José Escriba; Belén Aparicio Ruiz; José Remohí; Marcos Meseguer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Genome-wide haplotyping embryos developing from 0PN and 1PN zygotes increases transferrable embryos in PGT-M.

Authors:  Aspasia Destouni; Eftychia Dimitriadou; Heleen Masset; Sophie Debrock; Cindy Melotte; Kris Van Den Bogaert; Masoud Zamani Esteki; Jia Ding; Thiery Voet; Ellen Denayer; Thomy de Ravel; Eric Legius; Christel Meuleman; Karen Peeraer; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.