| Literature DB >> 29394327 |
Chi Heem Wong1, Kien Wei Siah1, Andrew W Lo2.
Abstract
Previous estimates of drug development success rates rely on relatively small samples from databases curated by the pharmaceutical industry and are subject to potential selection biases. Using a sample of 406 038 entries of clinical trial data for over 21 143 compounds from January 1, 2000 to October 31, 2015, we estimate aggregate clinical trial success rates and durations. We also compute disaggregated estimates across several trial features including disease type, clinical phase, industry or academic sponsor, biomarker presence, lead indication status, and time. In several cases, our results differ significantly in detail from widely cited statistics. For example, oncology has a 3.4% success rate in our sample vs. 5.1% in prior studies. However, after declining to 1.7% in 2012, this rate has improved to 2.5% and 8.3% in 2014 and 2015, respectively. In addition, trials that use biomarkers in patient-selection have higher overall success probabilities than trials without biomarkers.Entities:
Keywords: Clinical phase transition probabilities; Clinical trial statistics; Probabilities of success
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 29394327 PMCID: PMC6409418 DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx069
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biostatistics ISSN: 1465-4644 Impact factor: 5.899