Literature DB >> 20130567

Trends in risks associated with new drug development: success rates for investigational drugs.

J A DiMasi1, L Feldman, A Seckler, A Wilson.   

Abstract

This study utilizes both public and private data sources to estimate clinical phase transition and clinical approval probabilities for drugs in the development pipelines of the 50 largest pharmaceutical firms (by sales). The study examined the development histories of these investigational compounds from the time point at which they first entered clinical testing (1993-2004) through June 2009. The clinical approval success rate in the United States was 16% for self-originated drugs (originating from the pharmaceutical company itself) during both the 1993-1998 and the 1999-2004 subperiods. For all compounds (including licensed-in and licensed-out drugs in addition to self-originated drugs), the clinical approval success rate for the entire study period was 19%. The estimated clinical approval success rates and phase transition probabilities differed significantly by therapeutic class. The estimated clinical approval success rate for self-originated compounds over the entire study period was 32% for large molecules and 13% for small molecules. The estimated transition probabilities were also higher for all clinical phases with respect to large molecules.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20130567     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2009.295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  171 in total

1.  Endothelial Cell Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Co-Culture Assay For High Throughput Screening Assays For Discovery of Anti-Angiogenesis Agents and Other Therapeutic Molecules.

Authors:  George A Truskey
Journal:  Int J High Throughput Screen       Date:  2010-10-01

Review 2.  ADME of biologics-what have we learned from small molecules?

Authors:  Thomayant Prueksaritanont; Cuyue Tang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Maximizing the value of diagnostics in Alzheimer's disease drug development.

Authors:  Eric M Snyder; Jake Olin; Frank S David
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 4.  Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency.

Authors:  Jack W Scannell; Alex Blanckley; Helen Boldon; Brian Warrington
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 5.  Envisioning the future of early anticancer drug development.

Authors:  Timothy A Yap; Shahneen K Sandhu; Paul Workman; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Pharma Success in Product Development—Does Biotechnology Change the Paradigm in Product Development and Attrition.

Authors:  Ronald P Evens
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  What does the current biotech stock market value?

Authors:  Laura McNamee; Fred Ledley
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  A celebration of failure.

Authors:  Joseph Loscalzo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters.

Authors:  Chi Heem Wong; Kien Wei Siah; Andrew W Lo
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.899

10.  Tracking the pharmaceutical pipeline: clinical trials and global disease burden.

Authors:  Marci D Cottingham; Corey A Kalbaugh; Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.689

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.