Mads S Bergholt1,2,3, Andrea Serio1,2,3, James S McKenzie4, Amanda Boyd5, Renata F Soares4, Jocelyn Tillner4, Ciro Chiappini1,2,3, Vincen Wu4, Andreas Dannhorn4, Zoltan Takats4, Anna Williams5, Molly M Stevens1,2,3. 1. Department of Materials, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. 3. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. 4. Computational and Systems Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. 5. MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Analyzing lipid composition and distribution within the brain is important to study white matter pathologies that present focal demyelination lesions, such as multiple sclerosis. Some lesions can endogenously re-form myelin sheaths. Therapies aim to enhance this repair process in order to reduce neurodegeneration and disability progression in patients. In this context, a lipidomic analysis providing both precise molecular classification and well-defined localization is crucial to detect changes in myelin lipid content. Here we develop a correlated heterospectral lipidomic (HSL) approach based on coregistered Raman spectroscopy, desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (DESI-MS), and immunofluorescence imaging. We employ HSL to study the structural and compositional lipid profile of demyelination and remyelination in an induced focal demyelination mouse model and in multiple sclerosis lesions from patients ex vivo. Pixelwise coregistration of Raman spectroscopy and DESI-MS imaging generated a heterospectral map used to interrelate biomolecular structure and composition of myelin. Multivariate regression analysis enabled Raman-based assessment of highly specific lipid subtypes in complex tissue for the first time. This method revealed the temporal dynamics of remyelination and provided the first indication that newly formed myelin has a different lipid composition compared to normal myelin. HSL enables detailed molecular myelin characterization that can substantially improve upon the current understanding of remyelination in multiple sclerosis and provides a strategy to assess remyelination treatments in animal models.
Analyzing lipid composition and distribution within the brain is important to study white matter pathologies that present focal demyelination lesions, such as multiple sclerosis. Some lesions can endogenously re-form myelin sheaths. Therapies aim to enhance this repair process in order to reduce neurodegeneration and disability progression in patients. In this context, a lipidomic analysis providing both precise molecular classification and well-defined localization is crucial to detect changes in myelin lipid content. Here we develop a correlated heterospectral lipidomic (HSL) approach based on coregistered Raman spectroscopy, desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (DESI-MS), and immunofluorescence imaging. We employ HSL to study the structural and compositional lipid profile of demyelination and remyelination in an induced focal demyelinationmouse model and in multiple sclerosis lesions from patients ex vivo. Pixelwise coregistration of Raman spectroscopy and DESI-MS imaging generated a heterospectral map used to interrelate biomolecular structure and composition of myelin. Multivariate regression analysis enabled Raman-based assessment of highly specific lipid subtypes in complex tissue for the first time. This method revealed the temporal dynamics of remyelination and provided the first indication that newly formed myelin has a different lipid composition compared to normal myelin. HSL enables detailed molecular myelin characterization that can substantially improve upon the current understanding of remyelination in multiple sclerosis and provides a strategy to assess remyelination treatments in animal models.
Multiple sclerosis
is a degenerative condition of the central nervous
system, characterized by multifocal inflammatory demyelinating lesions.
Demyelination of axons compromises the efficiency of saltatory conduction
of electrical impulses[1] and reduces metabolic
support[2,3] to the underlying axon, causing increased
susceptibility to degeneration.[4,5] Remyelination occurs
to some extent in many multiple sclerosis lesions, but this process
varies between individual lesions and different patients and over
the disease course,[6−9] and remyelination inevitably fails over time.[6] Much research is now focusing on the discovery of therapies
that enhance remyelination, aiming to reduce axonal degeneration and
the subsequent progressive accumulation of disability in patients.To find an effective pro-remyelinating therapy, it will be crucial
to reliably and quickly analyze the amount of myelination in different
lesions at the molecular level in animal models of demyelination and
remyelination and, ideally, in living multiple sclerosispatients.
Furthermore, it is important to distinguish between myelin that has
been replaced (remyelinated myelin) and normal myelin. Currently,
to detect and quantify remyelination in tissue samples, whether from
animal models or multiple sclerosispatient brain tissue samples,
researchers generally use histochemical staining (e.g., Luxol fast
blue staining), or immunohistochemistry using antibodies targeted
against myelin proteins such as myelin basic protein (MBP), or proteolipid
protein,[10] but do not assess lipids which
are the main component of myelin. The current gold standard for more
comprehensive quantification of remyelination in a lesion, especially
in animal models of demyelination, is to use electron microscopy to
directly observe the number of myelinated axons and myelin sheath
thickness, as remyelinated myelin is usually thinner than normal myelin.[11,12] This method, however, does not examine the molecular content. In
general, conventional methods for assessing myelin require destructive
sample preparation (e.g., fixation, antigen retrieval, or delipidation
for antibody staining) and are poor at assessing the lipid composition
of myelin.Therefore, most myelin characterization performed
so far has focused
on myelin proteins, rather than on the lipid components. We know that
changes in myelin protein composition negatively impact axonal survival[13,14] and that subtle changes in protein composition (e.g., Claudin-11)
may occur in myelin after remyelination which may be similar to that
occurring in aging myelin.[15] As these proteins
are membrane bound or lipid anchored, alterations in the lipid composition
of myelin in disease or repair may also be important. However, as
yet, we have not identified any studies addressing the lipid composition
of newly formed myelin after demyelination in either models or humans,
perhaps as it is extremely challenging to identify spatially resolved
lipids in a focal lesion with current techniques. Yet, a full lipidomic
characterization of myelin and remyelinated myelin may provide additional
information to help better understand diseases such as multiple sclerosis.In recent years, several optical techniques have been introduced
for myelin characterization such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy[16,17] as well as stimulated Raman spectroscopy and coherent anti-Stokes
Raman spectroscopy.[18,19] Spontaneous Raman spectroscopy
techniques can acquire the full complement of biomolecular vibrational
information and identify a wealth of biomolecules (i.e., specific
biomolecular structures and conformations of proteins, lipids, nucleic
acids, etc.) in tissue, without labeling, using endogenous molecules
as a contrast mechanism. Importantly, lipids are the major components
in myelin sheaths, and these are particularly strong Raman scatterers,
making this vibrational imaging technique uniquely suited to elucidate
the complex structure of myelin.[19,20] Since Raman
spectroscopy is nondestructive and requires no tissue processing,
it can combine with other complementary techniques such as mass spectrometric
(MS) surface analysis by secondary ion MS (SIMS), desorption electrospray
ionization (DESI) or matrix-assisted laser desorption–ionization
MS (MALDI).[21−23] While Raman spectroscopy provides vibrational structural
information, mass spectrometry enables molecular identification. Although
several studies have reported on both techniques, their heterospectral
analysis has not yet been realized, mainly due to the computational
complexity associated with coregistration of the hyperspectral data
sets. Recently, a partial correlative approach was developed for Raman
spectroscopy and MALDI using neighboring tissue sections as a new
analytical strategy.[24] While MALDI provides
information on a broad range of species from metabolites to proteins,
it requires substantial sample preparation and presents limited capabilities
in the detection and characterization of species in the low m/z region associated with lipids.[25] In contrast, DESI-MS is an ambient technique
that requires virtually no sample preparation, can be performed on
glass slides compatible with confocal Raman spectroscopy thereby enabling
true correlative analysis, and is particularly suited to study lipids.[26] This makes it an optimal technique for studying
the molecular composition of myelin. Raman spectroscopic imaging (for
structural information) and DESI-MS imaging (for specific compositional
profiling) can provide two highly complementary techniques for lipid
characterization of brain tissue.In this study, we developed
a new correlated heterospectral lipidomics
(HSL) imaging strategy for molecular characterization and quantification
of remyelination based on correlative Raman spectroscopy and DESI-MS
analysis, validated with immunolabeling for specific myelin proteins.
We developed a comprehensive computational library for pixelwise coregistration
of Raman, DESI-MS hyperspectral data sets and immunofluorescence images.
We harnessed the wealth of Raman and DESI-MS hyperspectral data to
generate a heterospectral map for correlation of the biomolecular
structure and composition of tissue ex vivo. Multivariate
regression analysis enabled Raman-based assessment of highly specific
lipid subtypes in complex tissue for the first time. We applied the
HSL approach to the characterization of remyelination in a mouse model
of focal demyelination as well as postmortem brain
samples with multiple sclerosis. Here we show for the first time differences
in lipid composition not only between demyelinated and normal brain
tissue but, more importantly, between remyelinated tissue and normal
myelinated tissue.
Results
Heterospectral Lipidomics
(HSL) Workflow
Our computational
analysis framework takes full advantage of Raman-based molecular structural
information with subsequent lipid composition information provided
by DESI-MS imaging (Figure ). The data preprocessing, coregistration, and multivariate
analysis of the hyperspectral Raman and DESI-MS images were combined
into a comprehensive computational library in the Matlab environment
(see Materials and Methods). This allows us
to generate a heterospectral map for characterizing the lipidomics
of brain tissue based on the complementary structural and compositional
information. The heterospectral map can directly be used for spectral
interpretation including band assignment of overlapping Raman peaks.
Further, to enable Raman-based molecular assessment of specific lipid
species in the complex tissue we demonstrate here the multivariate
regression of the Raman spectra (vibrational information) against
the mass spectra (molecular weight distribution information) using
partial least-squares (PLS) analysis.
Figure 1
Heterospectral lipidomics for analysis
of myelination. Heterospectral
lipidomics (HSL) workflow for studying myelin in animal models and
human tissue.
Heterospectral lipidomics for analysis
of myelination. Heterospectral
lipidomics (HSL) workflow for studying myelin in animal models and
human tissue.We have also analyzed
the two modalities independently using multivariate
statistical analysis. For quantitive myelin analysis of the Raman
data set, we deconvolved the tissue Raman spectrum into myelin lipids
and nonmyelinated tissue using multivariate curve resolution (MCR).[27,28] We used the ratio of myelinated and nonmyelinated tissue from the
MCR to generate a Raman myelination index (RMI) representing the relative
amount of myelin in each sample. To confirm the fidelity of the RMI-based
myelin quantification we used immunofluorescence for identifying myelin
proteins, as a well-established reference technique (Figure ). For classification of the
Raman spectra and DESI mass spectra we employed the established PLS
discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and maximum margin criterion linear
discriminant analysis (MMC-LDA), respectively.[29]
Heterospectral Raman Spectroscopy, DESI-MS,
and Immunofluorescence
Imaging of Brain Tissue Samples
We first acquired a high-resolution
Raman spectroscopic image (∼9500 × 6100 μm, spatial
resolution of ∼10 μm) of a normal coronal brain section
(Figure A) containing
over 930 million data points (each pixel contains 1600 data points).
Each Raman spectrum was collected with an acquisition time of 0.4
s. Imaging the distinct lipid markers centered at 2850 cm–1 (symmetric CH2 stretching of lipids), protein content
2940 cm–1 (CH2 stretchings), and DNA
at 3000 cm–1 enabled visualization of central nervous
system (CNS) structural features (Figure A,B,D). Major myelinated structures including
the corpus callosum and striatal fiber bundles could clearly be demarcated
from a background of axonal lipids. Representative mean Raman spectra
(identified using k-means clustering, n = 2 clusters) are shown in Figure E,F with noticeable Raman peaks listed in Supplementary Table S1. We also constructed a
spectral library of some of the major proteins and lipids associated
with myelin and CNS by collecting Raman spectra of each purified lipid
or recombinant protein, from commercially available sources (Supplementary Figure S1). Analysis of the single
myelinated tissue component spectra confirms that the molecules largely
contributing to myelinated tissue spectra are lipids, including cerebroside,
cholesterols, sphingomyelin, phosphatidylcholine, and, to a much lesser
degree, proteins (Figure F).
Figure 2
Raman spectroscopy, desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry,
and immunofluorescence imaging of a mouse brain. (A) Images of a coronal
mouse brain section showing brightfield image and Raman spectroscopy
images associated with bands of lipids centered at 2850 cm–1, proteins at 2940 cm–1, and DNA at 3000 cm–1. Each spectrum in this image was baseline corrected
with a linear polynomial and normalized in the range 2780–3050
cm–1. Scale bar: 1 mm. (B) The Raman overlay of
lipids, proteins, and DNA. Scale bar: 1 mm. (C) Representative staining
for myelin bound protein (MBP), Tuj1 (class III beta-tubulin), and
4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Scale bar: 1 mm. (D)
High resolution microscopic Raman images of a region of interest in
the mouse brain (200 × 200 μm) showing Raman spectroscopy
peaks associated with lipids (2885 cm–1), proteins
(2940 cm–1), and DNA (3000 cm–1). Scale bar: 40 μm. (E) k-means clustering
(n = 2 clusters) showing distinct signatures of the
brain tissue. (F) Representative mean Raman spectra associated with
the two k-means clusters. (G) DESI-MS imaging of
the major myelin showing separation between gray and white matter
based on m/z 848.63 and m/z 844.52 respectively, putatively assigned
to Cer(d18:1/24:1) and PC(38:6). (H) Representative mean DESI-MS spectra
of gray and white matter (respectively in green and red).
Raman spectroscopy, desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry,
and immunofluorescence imaging of a mouse brain. (A) Images of a coronal
mouse brain section showing brightfield image and Raman spectroscopy
images associated with bands of lipids centered at 2850 cm–1, proteins at 2940 cm–1, and DNA at 3000 cm–1. Each spectrum in this image was baseline corrected
with a linear polynomial and normalized in the range 2780–3050
cm–1. Scale bar: 1 mm. (B) The Raman overlay of
lipids, proteins, and DNA. Scale bar: 1 mm. (C) Representative staining
for myelin bound protein (MBP), Tuj1 (class III beta-tubulin), and
4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Scale bar: 1 mm. (D)
High resolution microscopic Raman images of a region of interest in
the mouse brain (200 × 200 μm) showing Raman spectroscopy
peaks associated with lipids (2885 cm–1), proteins
(2940 cm–1), and DNA (3000 cm–1). Scale bar: 40 μm. (E) k-means clustering
(n = 2 clusters) showing distinct signatures of the
brain tissue. (F) Representative mean Raman spectra associated with
the two k-means clusters. (G) DESI-MS imaging of
the major myelin showing separation between gray and white matter
based on m/z 848.63 and m/z 844.52 respectively, putatively assigned
to Cer(d18:1/24:1) and PC(38:6). (H) Representative mean DESI-MS spectra
of gray and white matter (respectively in green and red).We then confirmed the molecular specificity of
Raman spectroscopy
by correlative immunofluorescence for MBP (myelin basic protein),
TUJ1 (beta3 tubulin), and DAPI (nuclei) (Figure C). This shows that Raman spectroscopic imaging
provides highly detailed information about different biomolecular
features in the tissue, down to the cellular level (Figure D), similarly to conventional
immunolabeling techniques.Since the immunostaining is inherently
destructive, in a sequential
brain section we performed DESI-MS (spatial resolution of ∼50
μm) and imaged the major myelin markers based on m/z 848.63 and gray matter, based on m/z 844.52, which were putatively assigned to Cer(d18:1/24:1)
and PC(38:6) respectively (Figure G). Representative mass spectra of white and gray matter
are shown in Figure H. These results show it is possible to image lipids in myelin
using both Raman spectroscopic structural information and DESI-MS
for specific compositional profiling.We finally showed that
Raman spectroscopy and DESI-MS can be performed
sequentially on the same tissue sample. We performed direct HSL analysis
by pixelwise coregistering the Raman and DESI-MS hyperspectral image
using our developed computational framework (Figure A–C), focusing on the corpus callosum
(Supplementary Figure 2 shows the anatomical
structure within the context of the brain section). This allowed us
to generate a heterospectral DESI-MS and Raman correlation map that
enables the assignment of structural features detected by vibrational
spectroscopy to individual molecular species detected by mass spectrometry
(Figure D,E). Generally,
the data showed a high degree of correlation between Raman vibrational
peaks associated with the myriad of different lipids. For instance,
we found the strongest positive correlation for the CH2 deformation vibrations near 1440 cm–1 and ν(C=C)
at 1650 cm–1 and mass peaks at m/z 844.52 suggestive of PC(38:6) lipids (correlation
coefficient >0.79 for 1440 cm–1, and correlation
coefficient >0.56 for 1650 cm–1). This technique
also revealed the subtle and apparently buried Raman peaks that cannot
be assessed using Raman spectroscopy alone (e.g., weak C–C
stretching bands of lipids in the range 1050–1200 cm–1). Conversely, as expected, the most common protein Raman peaks (e.g.,
the amide III at 1245 cm–1 and highly specific phenylalanine
Raman peak near 1004 cm–1) correlated poorly with
any of the masses. Interestingly, we also observed negative correlations,
in particular for the cytochrome resonance Raman peaks of mitochondria
(e.g., near 748 and 1585 cm–1). This is likely because
white matter contains an abundance of lipids and therefore relatively
fewer mitochondria per volume compared to gray matter. Hence, once
a single heterospectral map has been developed for a specific tissue
type, this can improve spectral interpretation including band assignment
of overlapping Raman peaks and allows us to better understand the
compositional origin of overlapping Raman peaks in biological complex
samples and vice versa for DESI-MS imaging. Since excellent correlation
could be achieved, we then performed a PLS multivariate regression
of the Raman spectra against the mass spectra (see Materials and Methods). As an example we regressed the Raman
spectrum against the m/z 844.52
PC(38:6). The regression vector showed highly specific lipid peaks
indicating specificity to phosphatidylcholine (Figure F). The regression analysis showed that a
highly linear relationship could be established (adjusted R2 = 0.825) (Figure G). Assuming—in a first approximation—linearity
of the mass spectrum with concentration, this Raman-based model can
serve as a predictor of specific lipid species in complex tissue.
These results represent a novel demonstration of lipidomic profiling
using complementary spectral modalities based on both structural and
biomolecular information.
Figure 3
Pixelwise heterospectral Raman and DESI-MS.
Heterospectral correlation
maps between Raman and DESI-MS hyperspectral images (negative mode).
(A) DESI ion image showing the location of the fiducial markers with
corresponding locations in panel B marked for the Raman ion image.
(C) The transformed DESI image with a region of interest showing the
pixels used for correlative analysis of DESI and Raman data. (D) Threshold
of heterospectral correlation set at 0.2. (E) Threshold of correlation
coefficient set at 0.7. In both D and E the correlations with p > 0.05 were discounted. (F) PLS regression vector showing
that the model is sensitive to the lipid specific peaks m/z 844.52. (G) PLS regression showing a predictive
model with an adjusted R-square of 0.825.
Pixelwise heterospectral Raman and DESI-MS.
Heterospectral correlation
maps between Raman and DESI-MS hyperspectral images (negative mode).
(A) DESI ion image showing the location of the fiducial markers with
corresponding locations in panel B marked for the Raman ion image.
(C) The transformed DESI image with a region of interest showing the
pixels used for correlative analysis of DESI and Raman data. (D) Threshold
of heterospectral correlation set at 0.2. (E) Threshold of correlation
coefficient set at 0.7. In both D and E the correlations with p > 0.05 were discounted. (F) PLS regression vector showing
that the model is sensitive to the lipid specific peaks m/z 844.52. (G) PLS regression showing a predictive
model with an adjusted R-square of 0.825.
Heterospectral Lipidomics in a Mouse Model
We first
applied our HSL characterization to tissue from a mouse model of demyelination
as a proof of principle. We assembled correlative images that incorporate
specific immunolabeling for MBP with the Raman k-mean
clustering images (n = 2 clusters) for the lipid
component using ImageJ and found that the lipid-rich component identified
correlated well with the MBP+ myelinated areas in the tissue (Supplementary Figure S2).We then used
a mouse model of focal demyelination based on stereotactic injection
of lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) into the mouse corpus callosum.[11] We acquired high resolution Raman spectroscopic
images (n = 15) of the corpus callosum in fixed coronal
brain sections. We analyzed sections taken from days 14, 21, and 28
after LPC injection in order to cover the whole process from demyelination
to complete remyelination (day 28 post injection). We used two controls:
noninjected mice (control) and mice injected with saline only at day
14 post injection (i.e., with no demyelination). We then calculated
the RMI (see Materials and Methods) at different
time points post LPC injection by deconvolving the myelinated tissue
spectrum using MCR (Figure A). Figure A displays two pure MCR basis spectra essentially representing myelin
lipids and demyelinated axons accounting for 90.68% (component 1,
61.55%, component 2, 29.13%, respectively) of the spectral variance.
The omitted residual (7.39%) in the model was associated with artifacts
from tissue preparation and cover glass background signal. Since MCR
is based on spectral variance and because the amount of myelin lipids
is the source of significant spectral variability in the image, MCR
is able to estimate a spectrum of myelin lipids (Figure A). This is also evident by
comparing the myelin signature with the pure lipids (Supplementary Figure S1) as well as the strong correlations
in the heterospectral map (Figure D,E).
Figure 4
Quantification of remyelination in a mouse model using
RMI. (A)
MCR deconvolved pure components representing demyelinated tissue and
myelinated tissue with marked signatures for lipids. The ratio of
myelinated to demyelinated tissue was used to form the RMI (most relevant
peaks highlighted). (B) Images of RMI, correlative immunostaining
for MBP, and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining
for control, 14 and 28 days post LPC injection. Scale bar: 500 μm.
(C) Mean RMI, MBP, and DAPI fold change ± 1 standard error compared
to contralateral hemisphere for 14, 21, and 28 days post injection.
Also shown are control (nontreated) and saline injected (day 14).
* indicates p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA: for RMI fold
change p = 0.006, Newman–Keuls post-test LPC
day 14 vs day 28/control/saline p < 0.05; for
MBP fold change p = 0.002, Newman–Keuls post-test
LPC day 14 vs day 28/control p < 0.05).
Quantification of remyelination in a mouse model using
RMI. (A)
MCR deconvolved pure components representing demyelinated tissue and
myelinated tissue with marked signatures for lipids. The ratio of
myelinated to demyelinated tissue was used to form the RMI (most relevant
peaks highlighted). (B) Images of RMI, correlative immunostaining
for MBP, and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining
for control, 14 and 28 days post LPC injection. Scale bar: 500 μm.
(C) Mean RMI, MBP, and DAPI fold change ± 1 standard error compared
to contralateral hemisphere for 14, 21, and 28 days post injection.
Also shown are control (nontreated) and saline injected (day 14).
* indicates p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA: for RMI fold
change p = 0.006, Newman–Keuls post-test LPC
day 14 vs day 28/control/saline p < 0.05; for
MBP fold change p = 0.002, Newman–Keuls post-test
LPC day 14 vs day 28/control p < 0.05).To validate the RMI for myelin
quantification, we performed correlative
immunohistochemistry for MBP and DAPI on the same tissues and used
the immunofluorescence image to define injected and noninjected regions
of interest (ROI) on each section (Supplementary Figure S3). These ROIs were then used to generate binary masks
and extract the RMI. For this myelin quantification, the signal density
from either MBP immunostaining or RMI images was calculated as a ratio
of the signal density on the injected side of the corpus callosum
compared to the noninjected side. The densitometry ratio of injected
vs noninjected side for each sample was then normalized to the values
obtained with control sections from untreated mice. We have summarized
the average RMI ± 1 standard error (SE) at different time points
(Figure C left panel).
The results of this quantification showed a 52% reduction in myelin
(0.50 fold decrease compared to 0.95 of control, ±0.14 fold change)
at 14 days after injection compared to controls (p < 0.05). During remyelination, the RMI increased to 62% compared
to the control untreated mice (0.61 fold decrease compared to 0.95
of control, ±0.12 fold change) at day 21 after lesion induction,
and after 28 days the RMI progressively reverted back to control levels
(0.96 fold decrease compared to 0.95 of control, ±0.03 fold change).
These values correlated well with the MBP densitometric analysis performed
on the correlative immunofluorescence images (Figure C central panel). The significant increase
in DAPI+ cells observed at day 14 after LPC injection (1.4
fold increase ± 0.13, p < 0.05) compared
to control corresponds to an accumulation of microglia/macrophages
in the lesion, which we identified by correlative immunofluorescence
for the microglial marker IBA1 in a subset of sections already analyzed
by Raman spectroscopy (Supplementary Figure S4). Along with the increased microglia/macrophage infiltration into
demyelinated lesions, Raman spectroscopy also revealed the presence
of cholesterol esters (through the presence of the ester vibrational
mode at 1745 cm–1), generally around the lesion
site, suggestive of end products of myelin degradation, which is performed
and then cleared by these cells.We next assessed whether Raman
analysis could identify specific
biomolecular structural differences for different levels of myelination.
We first calculated the mean Raman spectra ± 1 SD using the ROIs
defined above as a guide (Figure A, Supplementary Figure S5A), and then we calculated the mean difference spectra for each time
point to uncover subtle molecular differences between samples (Figure B, Supplementary Figure S5B). Spectral analysis showed that demyelinated
lesions are associated with a distinct Raman spectroscopic profile,
with reduction and/or spectral shifting in the peaks 1078, 1302, 1445,
and 1650 cm–1. Interestingly, there were spectral
differences between normally myelinated and remyelinated tissue (day
28 post LPC injection). To investigate this further, we performed
PLS-DA on a day 28 tissue (remyelinated) compared to contralateral
control and gray matter tissue. The 8 component PLS-DA accounted for
61.95% of the total variance where the first four latent variables
(LVs) (LV1, 49.59%; LV2, 6.16%; LV3, 1.12%; and LV4, 1.77%) corresponded
mostly to lipid peaks (e.g., CH2 deformations at 1440 and
C=C stretchings at 1650 cm–1) (Supplementary Figure S6A and Figure D). Based on this analysis,
we then constructed an image of the corpus callosum that shows the
probability of each pixel belonging to either the injected side (red)
or noninjected side (green) (Figure C). These results show that newly formed myelin in
remyelination can to some extent be distinguished from normal myelin
using Raman imaging. The data presented thus far shows that Raman
based characterization can detect subtle differences in the molecular
structure of remyelinated and normal tissue.
Figure 5
Heterospectral lipidomics
of remyelinated lesions in a focal demyelination
mouse model. (A, B) Mean Raman spectra ± 1 standard deviation
(SD) of normal myelinated tissues (noninjected side) and remyelinated
tissue (injected side, day 28 post toxin injection). (B) Mean difference
spectra ± 1 SD (injected side, contralateral) showing the remyelination
process at the structural level. (C) PLS-DA posterior probability
image based on Raman spectroscopy of remyelinated sample discriminating
control side (green) and injected side (red). Yellow represents nearly
equal probability. (D, G) Mean DESI-MS mass spectra of normal myelinated
tissues (noninjected side) and remyelinated tissue (injected side,
day 28 post toxin injection) for negative and positive ion mode, respectively.
(E, H) Mean difference spectra between remyelinated (day 28 post toxin
injection) and control noninjected side for negative and positive
ion mode, respectively. (F, I) MMC-LDA posterior probability based
on DESI-MS negative ion mode and positive mode respectively belonging
to control side (green) or injected side (red). Yellow represents
nearly equal probability (images were rotated for presentation in
this figure; originals are shown in Supplementary Figure S6D,E). Scale bar 250 μm.
Heterospectral lipidomics
of remyelinated lesions in a focal demyelinationmouse model. (A, B) Mean Raman spectra ± 1 standard deviation
(SD) of normal myelinated tissues (noninjected side) and remyelinated
tissue (injected side, day 28 post toxin injection). (B) Mean difference
spectra ± 1 SD (injected side, contralateral) showing the remyelination
process at the structural level. (C) PLS-DA posterior probability
image based on Raman spectroscopy of remyelinated sample discriminating
control side (green) and injected side (red). Yellow represents nearly
equal probability. (D, G) Mean DESI-MS mass spectra of normal myelinated
tissues (noninjected side) and remyelinated tissue (injected side,
day 28 post toxin injection) for negative and positive ion mode, respectively.
(E, H) Mean difference spectra between remyelinated (day 28 post toxin
injection) and control noninjected side for negative and positive
ion mode, respectively. (F, I) MMC-LDA posterior probability based
on DESI-MS negative ion mode and positive mode respectively belonging
to control side (green) or injected side (red). Yellow represents
nearly equal probability (images were rotated for presentation in
this figure; originals are shown in Supplementary Figure S6D,E). Scale bar 250 μm.The Raman myelination analysis was initially performed on
fixed
brain tissue. Since DESI-MS must be performed on fresh tissue, in
addition, this allowed us to compare fixed and nonfixed brain to investigate
potential differences introduced by the fixation process to the Raman
profiling of brain tissue. The fixation process induces subtle molecular
changes in the corpus callosum mostly around 1450 cm–1 associated with CH2 deformations (Supplementary Figure S7), most likely due to conformational
changes in proteins occurring during formaldehyde fixation. All subsequent
Raman myelination analysis was performed on unfixed tissue, which
was then immediately imaged with DESI-MS.Following Raman spectroscopy,
DESI-MS images were acquired from
fresh mouse brain samples (remyelinated lesion (injected side at day
28) and contralateral normal side (noninjected side)). We calculated
the average DESI mass spectra in the negative and positive ion modes
(Figure D,G) as well
as the mean difference spectra to highlight dissimilarities between
the DESI mass spectra of the different samples (Figure E,H). To identify those masses that best
differentiate remyelinated from control tissue, we performed MMC-LDA.[29] We calculated the MMC-LDA loading vectors for
the negative and positive modes (Supplementary Figure S6B,C). We then produced images that show the posterior
probability of belonging to the injected (red) or noninjected side
(green). This analysis essentially confirmed the Raman spectral characterization
and showed highly specific molecular changes in the remyelinated lesion
(injected side) compared to the contralateral normal side (noninjected
side), in particular for the positive ion mode (Figure F,I). The most significant peaks discriminating
remyelinated and normal myelinated areas of the corpus callosum were
then confirmed by tandem mass spectrometry (see Materials
and Methods) and are reported in Table . The main differences between normal myelin
and remyelinated tissue are generally due to changes in the composition
of phosphatidylcholines (PCs) and phosphatidylethanolamines (PEs)
within the analyzed areas. Hence, both the Raman and DESI-MS suggest
that the lipid composition of remyelinated regions differs from that
of original myelin. The results obtained from the mouse model serve
as a proof of principle to show that HSL imaging can effectively investigate
the lipidomic profile of remyelinated lesions, as well as providing
the first direct indication that newly formed myelin after demyelination
presents a distinct molecular signature and a relative lipid composition
difference compared to normal myelin.
Table 1
DESI-MS
Peak Annotation for Mouse
Remyelinated Tissuea
m/z value
identification
ion type
accurate mass
fold change (remyelinated vs control)
Positive Ion Mode
770.49
PC (32:1)
[M + K]+
770.5097
0.7367
848.53
PC (38:4)
[M + K]+
848.5566
0.8416
826.56
PC (36:1)
[M + K]+
826.5723
0.8531
810.58
PC (36:1)
[M +
Na]+
810.5983
0.8533
824.53
PC (36:2)
[M + K]+
824.5566
0.8893
772.51
PC (32:0)
[M + K]+
772.5253
1.1367
806.55
PC (32:3)
[M +
Na]+
806.567
1.4514
806.55
PC(38:3) or PC(40:6)
[M + Na]+ or [M + H]
834.5983 or 834.6007
1.4527
806.55
PE (40:6)
[M + Na]+
814.5357
1.4718
872.54
PC (40:6)
[M +
K]+
872.5566
1.5848
844.51
PC (38:6)
[M + K]+
844.5253
1.6879
Negative Ion Mode
700.51
fragment of PE(34:1)
PE(34:1) – NH2 – H
700.5049
0.8488
700.51
PE(20:4/16:0)
[M – H]−
766.5392
1.1528
762.49
PE(16:0/22:6)
[M – H]−
762.5079
1.3086
774.52
PE(16:0/22:6)
[PE(40:6) – NH2 – H]−
774.5205
1.3314
790.53
PE(18:0/22:6)
[M – H]−
790.5392
1.4966
The most significant mass spectrometry
peaks in negative and positive ion mode identified using maximum margin
criterion linear discriminant analysis (MMC-LDA) for discriminating
between remyelinated and normal myelinated areas of the corpus callosum
in the mouse model of toxin induced focal demyelination, confirmed
by MSMS.
The most significant mass spectrometry
peaks in negative and positive ion mode identified using maximum margin
criterion linear discriminant analysis (MMC-LDA) for discriminating
between remyelinated and normal myelinated areas of the corpus callosum
in the mouse model of toxin induced focal demyelination, confirmed
by MSMS.
Application of Heterospectral
Lipidomics to Multiple Sclerosis
Patient Brain Samples
We finally applied our HSL approach
to multiple sclerosis lesions from human postmortem brain samples for label-free lesion classification and lipidomic
analysis. We obtained normal control brain samples (n = 4) and multiple sclerosis brain samples containing chronic active
demyelinated lesions (n = 6), chronic inactive demyelinated
lesions (n = 8), and remyelinated lesions (n = 4) from 8 multiple sclerosispatients. A total of 83,116
Raman spectra were measured from normal control tissue (n = 29,316 spectra), combined chronic active and inactive multiple
sclerosis lesions (n = 14,354 spectra), and remyelinated
lesions (n = 39,446 spectra) (Figure A and Supplementary Figure S8A). We calculated the difference spectra ± 1 SD to uncover
the molecular differences associated with each tissue type (Figure B and Supplementary Figure S8B).
Figure 6
Heterospectral lipidomics
of human multiple sclerosis brain. (A)
Mean Raman spectra ± 1 standard deviation (SD) of normal appearing
white matter (NAWM) and remyelinated lesions. (B) Mean difference
spectra ± 1 SD (NAWM – remyelinated lesion) showing the
remyelination process at the structural level. (C) PLS-DA posterior
probability image based on Raman spectroscopy of remyelinated lesions
highlighting NAWM (green) and remyelinated tissue (red). (D, G) Mean
DESI-MS mass spectra of NAWM and remyelinated lesions for negative
and positive ion mode, respectively. (E, H) Mean difference spectra
between NAWM and remyelinated lesions for negative and positive ion
mode respectively. (F, I) MMC-LDA posterior probability based on DESI-MS
negative ion mode and positive mode respectively of belonging to NAWM
(green) or remyelinated lesion (red). Yellow represents nearly equal
probability. Scale bar 750 μm.
Heterospectral lipidomics
of humanmultiple sclerosis brain. (A)
Mean Raman spectra ± 1 standard deviation (SD) of normal appearing
white matter (NAWM) and remyelinated lesions. (B) Mean difference
spectra ± 1 SD (NAWM – remyelinated lesion) showing the
remyelination process at the structural level. (C) PLS-DA posterior
probability image based on Raman spectroscopy of remyelinated lesions
highlighting NAWM (green) and remyelinated tissue (red). (D, G) Mean
DESI-MS mass spectra of NAWM and remyelinated lesions for negative
and positive ion mode, respectively. (E, H) Mean difference spectra
between NAWM and remyelinated lesions for negative and positive ion
mode respectively. (F, I) MMC-LDA posterior probability based on DESI-MS
negative ion mode and positive mode respectively of belonging to NAWM
(green) or remyelinated lesion (red). Yellow represents nearly equal
probability. Scale bar 750 μm.Although the pixelwise coregistrated HSL map we developed
(Figure ) was based
on mouse
tissue, it also informed our interpretation of the Raman spectra from
human tissues. The multiple sclerosis remyelinated lesions showed
less complete remyelination compared to the remyelination in the mouse
model, as indicated by the lower intensity of lipid peaks at 1302,
1445, and 1650 cm–1. There were also more pronounced
peaks of mitochondria such as 1585 cm–1 associated
with cellular infiltration of the lesion (Figure B). As in the mouse model, the Raman based
analysis successfully identified specific signatures not only for
demyelinated lesions but also for remyelinated lesions.To further
study these compositional differences, we performed
correlative DESI-MS by comparing remyelinated lesions from 8 multiple
sclerosispatient brains (identified by histopathological classification)
with normal appearing white matter tissue from the same patient aiming
to obtain the specific lipid profile associated with remyelinated
lesions in patients (Figure D–I). We performed MMC-LDA to identify the most discriminative
peaks that accounted for the differences observed between remyelinated
and normal appearing white matter (Supplementary Figure S6C). The identified lipids were then confirmed by tandem
mass spectrometry and are reported in Table . As observed in the mouse tissue analysis,
the remyelinated areas differ mainly in the composition of the PC
and PElipid populations. These results indicate that HSL imaging
can be effectively employed for lipidomic profiling of postmortem multiple sclerosispatient lesions, and suggest that the myelin
produced during remyelination in multiple sclerosis has an altered
lipid profile, when compared to nearby normal appearing white matter.
Table 2
DESI-MS Peak Annotation for Human
Remyelinated Lesionsa
m/z value
identification
ion type
accurate mass
fold change (remyelinated vs control)
Positive Ion Mode
848.53
PC (38:4)
[M + K]+
848.5566
0.449
834.57
PC(38:3)
[M + Na]+
834.5983
0.4628
814.51
PE (40:6)
[M + Na]+
814.5357
0.4689
810.58
PC (36:1)
[M +
Na]+
814.5357
0.5674
826.56
PC (36:1)
[M + K]+
826.5723
0.6284
824.53
PC (36:2)
[M + K]+
824.5566
0.7083
806.49
PE (38:4)
[M +
K]+
806.5096
1.0512
872.54
PC (40:6)
[M + K]+
872.5566
1.2509
844.51
PC (38:6)
[M + K]+
844.5253
1.5723
770.49
PC (32:1)
[M +
K]+
770.5097
1.6884
772.51
PC (32:0)
[M + K]+
772.5253
2.2756
Negative Ion Mode
762.49
PE(16:0/22:6)
[M – H]−
762.5079
0.7603
700.51
PE(16:0/18:1)
[PE(34:1) – NH2 – H]−
700.5049
0.8252
790.53
PE(18:0/22:6)
[M – H]−
790.5392
1.9916
774.52
fragment of PE(40:6)
[PE(40:6) – NH2 – H]−
774.5205
2.2611
774.52
fragment of PE(18:0/22:6)]
[PE(40:6) – C2H4NH2 – H]−
746.4892
2.4167
766.53
PE(20:4/16:0)
[M – H]−
762.5392
3.0029
The most significant mass spectrometry
peaks in negative and positive ion mode identified using maximum margin
criterion linear discriminant analysis (MMC-LDA) for discriminating
between remyelinated and normal myelinated tissue in human brain samples,
confirmed by MSMS.
The most significant mass spectrometry
peaks in negative and positive ion mode identified using maximum margin
criterion linear discriminant analysis (MMC-LDA) for discriminating
between remyelinated and normal myelinated tissue in human brain samples,
confirmed by MSMS.
Discussion
In this study, we developed a new heterospectral lipidomics (HSL)
imaging method, for the classification and molecular characterization
of myelination in both an animal model and humanmultiple sclerosis
brain samples, and used it to directly observe for the first time
that newly formed myelin is compositionally different from normal
myelinated tissue. To harness the large amount of data generated,
we developed a comprehensive computational library for correlative
heterospectral imaging. The combined use of Raman spectroscopy and
DESI-MS within the HSL workflow offers a simple and yet highly effective
approach to profile the lipidomics of de- and remyelinated tissue
at both the structural and compositional levels. In contrast to other
techniques such as MALDI, our DESI-MS has the major advantage that
it can be performed with no initial preparation on the same sample
as for Raman spectroscopy thereby enabling true correlative analysis.
Here we developed the first pixelwise coregistration approach for
heterospectral Raman and DESI-MS imaging analysis. This allowed us
to generate a correlation map that describes how the distinct vibrational
molecular structural features correlate with compositional analysis.
Further, we also showed for the first time that multivariate regression
analysis between Raman spectra and mass spectra has the potential
to enable Raman-based characterization of highly specific lipid species
in complex tissue.Our results indicate that Raman spectroscopy
can discriminate between
normal, demyelinated, and remyelinated areas in our mouse model and
in humanmultiple sclerosis tissue, avoiding classical destructive
and time-consuming analyses. In addition, we showed that Raman spectral
analysis could identify structural differences not only between demyelinated
and control tissue (comparable to that obtained with MBP staining),
but importantly between control and remyelinated tissue, offering
for the first time a specific comprehensive and distinct molecular
signature for remyelinated tissue, with most of the differences in
the lipid components. This concurs with previous knowledge that remyelinated
and myelinated internodes have very similar protein components, but
remyelinated myelin sheaths are thinner (due to less myelin wrapping).[30] The HSL correlation map enabled us to gain deeper
insight into the biomolecular origin of the highly overlapping Raman
peaks. Moreover, Raman spectroscopy enables a detailed structural
molecular characterization of the tissue, as it not only can quantify
the lipid component but also provides additional information on the
underlying disease processes (such as immune infiltration, increased
mitochondria, etc.) without requiring multiple immunostainings of
serial histological sections.Correlative DESI-MS analysis showed
that some lipids can be over-represented
in remyelinated myelin as well as under-represented, suggesting that
remyelination can differ from normal myelin in more than simply a
reduced amount of lipid secondary to a thinner sheath. PCs and PEs
are two of the major constituents of mammalian cell membranes including
those of myelin, and they account for most of the differences between
remyelinated and normal myelin in both the mouse and human multiple
sclerosis brains. In the focal demyelinationmouse model, we found
a trend toward decrease in some polyunsaturated PEs and PCs in remyelinated
tissue, and a corresponding increase in PCs with higher saturation
levels, which could correlate with the thinner myelin sheaths. In
humanremyelinated multiple sclerosis lesions we also observed a similar
shift in several PC and PE species, but the exact changes are more
complex to interpret. However, it is interesting to observe that both
mouse and human remyelinated tissue showed an increase in PC(32:0),
a phosphatidylcholine normally present in greater abundance within
gray matter.[31] The reasons for some discrepancy
between the remyelinated lesions in the mouse and human data sets
may be due to intrinsic differences in lipid content in myelin between
species, to interindividual/anatomical variations typical of patient
samples. In fact, while in the mouse samples we had precise control
over the anatomical area of the lesion (i.e., corpus callosum), the
multiple sclerosis lesions came from different anatomical regions
of the brain, and are certainly more heterogeneous than the murine
samples along the remyelination timeline. However, given the scarcity
of lipidomic data on myelin composition in health and pathology in
both mouse and human, partially due to a previous lack of accessible
and reliable techniques to perform these studies, we believe that
these results offer an important, if preliminary, step toward a better
understanding of remyelination, as they directly highlight previously
unrecognized differences between myelin formed during endogenous regeneration
and normal myelinated tissue. Using these techniques, and a bigger
data set of patient samples, one will be able to address lipid variations
in remyelinated multiple sclerosis lesions within a patient (removing
genetic background variation) and between remyelinated lesions in
similar locations between patients (reducing anatomical variation).
Furthermore, as we know that myelin changes with age both at the ultrastructural
level[32,33] and in terms of its lipid components,[34] this raises questions such as whether the lipid
content of remyelinated myelin is more similar to young or old myelin,
or different from both, and whether this changes in a similar way
over time. Now that we have proof of principle that this strategy
is suitable, we may answer these questions, both in animal models
and by examining humanmultiple sclerosis samples of different ages,
compared to controls of different ages. It is also important to determine
whether the quality of remyelinated myelin is equivalent to normal
myelin, whether it matures/ages at a different rate, and whether it
can change in response to need, for example as required in activity-dependent
myelination.[35] This has pertinence for
the development of pro-remyelinating drugs as therapies in multiple
sclerosis.The HSL strategy developed here represents a powerful
tool to classify,
quantify, and analyze lipids in myelin, increasing information for
selecting the most promising pro-remyelination therapeutic strategies.
Understanding lipid structural and compositional differences between
myelination and remyelination may allow us to identify remyelinated
areas more efficiently. The HSL imaging workflow presented here will
allow one to investigate specific questions such as whether these
lipid differences alter the function of myelin, in terms of the efficiency
of saltatory conduction and the metabolic support to the underlying
axon. In addition, future pragmatic studies could aim to apply simultaneous
Raman and mass spectrometry for living tissue assessment as well as
clinical applications toward lipidomic diagnostics. Both Raman spectroscopy
and some mass spectroscopy approaches are in principle compatible
with clinical applications.[36] Furthermore,
the multivariate regression approach that we presented in this work
can find widespread applications to uncover the plurality of molecular
species in complex biological tissue.In summary, we have developed
a heterospectral lipidomics (HSL)
methodology to quantify and characterize remyelination in a mouse
model of induced focal demyelination and in humanmultiple sclerosis
lesions. We demonstrated the first pixelwise coregistered heterospectral
application of Raman spectroscopy and DESI-MS imaging. This analysis
provides the first indication that newly formed myelin after demyelination
has a different lipid composition compared to normal myelin. Hence,
this HSL methodology may substantially improve the current understanding
of remyelination in multiple sclerosis and may provide a new strategy
to assess remyelination treatments in multiple sclerosis research.
Furthermore, the HSL approach can be tailored to a broad range of
tissues, providing crucial insights into lipid structure and composition
in biomedical sciences.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Animal
work was carried out in accordance with
the University of Edinburgh regulations under Home Office rules (PPL
60/4524), with local ethics committee consent. Animals were randomly
allocated a treatment group.
Lesion Induction and Surgery
Myelin
toxin lysophosphatidylcholine
(LPC) was stereotactically injected into mouse corpus callosum to
cause focal demyelination while leaving axons intact. The time course
of demyelination and remyelination ensues in a stereotyped way, with
a fully developed demyelinated lesion at 3 days post injection followed
by spontaneous remyelination to completion in 4 weeks.[37] Using anesthetized 12–14-week-old C57Bl/6
male mice (n = 3 per time point), 2 μL of 1%
(w/v) LPC (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) was injected through a hole drilled
in the skull at stereotactic coordinates 1.2 mm posterior, 0.5 mm
lateral, 1.4 mm deep to the bregma over 4 min using a 30 gauge needle
attached to a Hamilton syringe, driven by a Nano pump (KD Scientific
Inc., Holliston, MA), which was left in situ for
4 min to reduce backflow. A surgical sham control was also prepared
by injecting phosphate-buffered saline (0.9% sodium chloride solution)
in the same way. Mice were sacrificed at predefined time points (14,
21, and 28 days) post lesion induction.
Mice Tissue Section Preparation
Mice were terminally
anesthetized and perfused transcardially either with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde
(PFA) solution (for Raman analysis) or with phosphate-buffered saline
(0.9% (w/v) sodium chloride solution) (for DESI analysis) at 14, 21,
or 28 days post injection. For Raman analysis, brains were dissected
and postfixed in 4% (w/v) PFA for a further 24 h, before immersion
in increasing concentrations of sucrose solutions, and frozen in OCT
embedding matrix. For DESI analysis, brains were flash frozen without
fixation. Using a cryostat (Leica Inc. GmbH), 10 μm coronal
sections were cut onto magnesium fluoride slides (Global Optics Ltd.,
UK) (Raman analysis) or Superfrost Plus (VWR International LLC Inc.,
Radnor, PA) adhesive glass slides (DESI analysis) and stored at −20
°C until use.
Human Brain Tissue Samples
Postmortem unfixed frozen tissue was obtained from the UK
Multiple Sclerosis
Tissue Bank via a UK prospective donor scheme with full ethical approval
(MREC/02/2/39). Two independent researchers characterized the lesion
types as chronic active, chronic inactive, or remyelinated using Luxol
fast blue to detect myelin and Oil red O staining to detect macrophages/microglia.[11] Chronic active lesions have a demyelinated core
with few inflammatory cells, but a ring of lipid-laden macrophages/microglia
at their edge. Chronic inactive lesions have a sharp edge on LFB and
few inflammatory cells throughout. Remyelinated lesions are filled
with thin (pale-staining) myelin, with very few inflammatory cells
remaining. We obtained normal control brain samples with no neurological
disease (n = 4) and multiple sclerosis brain samples
containing chronic active demyelinated lesions (n = 6), chronic inactive demyelinated lesions (n =
8), and remyelinated lesions (n = 4) from 8 different
multiple sclerosispatients.
Reference Biochemicals
We constructed
a spectral library
of reference biochemicals representing the major proteins and lipids
in CNS including MBP (M2941, Sigma-Aldrich (UK)), actin (C3653, Sigma-Aldrich
(UK)), phosphatidylcholine (P3556), glycerophosphatidylcholine (S4335)
sphingomyelin (860062, Avanti Polar Lipids Inc., Alabaster, AL), cholesterol
(C8667, Sigma-Aldrich (UK)), DOPC (C8667, Sigma-Aldrich (UK)), galactocerebrosides
(C4905, Sigma-Aldrich (UK)), cerebroside sulfate (S1006, Sigma-Aldrich
(UK)), and LPC (L1381, Sigma-Aldrich (UK)). The Raman spectra of these
reference biochemicals were all measured in native state on a magnesium
fluoride (MgF2) slide.
Raman Spectroscopy Imaging
The confocal Raman microspectroscopy
system used in this study consists of an upright microscope (Alpha
3000, WITec, GmbH, Ulm) equipped with a piezoelectric stage (UHTS
300, WITec, GmbH, Ulm). A green laser (λex = 532
nm, WITec GmbH, Ulm) with maximum output of 75 mW was fiber-coupled
into the microscope using a 10 μm low OH silica fiber. The backscattered
Raman signals were fed into a high-throughput imaging spectrograph
(UHTS 300, WITec GmbH, Ulm), equipped with a thermoelectrically cooled
(−60 °C), charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (Newton,
Andor Technology Ltd., UK, Belfast) using a 100 μm low OH silica
fiber. The system acquires Raman spectra in the range from 0 to 3600
cm–1 with a spectral resolution of ∼13 cm–1.For mice, Raman spectroscopy images (∼3000
× 1500 μm (spatial resolution of ∼6 μm)) were
measured by raster scanning over contralateral regions of corpus callosum.
Each Raman spectrum was collected with an acquisition time of ∼1.0
s and a power on the sample of ∼13 mW using the 532 nm laser
excitation. No sample degradation due to heating was noticed using
this power density. We did observe fluorescence bleaching for brain
tissue using the 532 nm laser.For human samples, Raman images
were measured by raster scanning
covering lesions and control tissue. We measured tissue from n = 8 patients. For each tissue/lesion we measured ∼2500
spectra in quadratic ROIs that each were 150 × 150 to 180 ×
180 μm in size. Each Raman spectrum was collected with an acquisition
time of ∼1.0 s and a power on the sample of ∼13 mW using
the 532 nm laser excitation.
Raman Data Analysis
Before multivariate
statistical
analysis, the Raman spectra were preprocessed. First, to remove tissue
autofluorescence, a constrained second-order polynomial was fitted
to the raw spectrum in the range 500–3600 cm–1, and this polynomial was then subtracted to yield the Raman spectrum
alone. This was performed in the Project Four (WITec, Ulm, Germany).
Each Raman spectrum was normalized to its total intensity. For univariate
analysis we imaged the high wavenumber (due to higher signal intensity).
For multivariate analysis and discrimination of subtle difference
we analyzed the more specific fingerprint range.Regions within
the sample were annotated as either “control” or “lesion”.
These annotated pixels were extracted and analyzed using partial least-squares
discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and internal 10-fold cross validation.k-means clustering (n = 2 clusters)
was calculated in Project Four (WITec, Ulm, Germany) and used to coregister
myelin lipids and MBP staining.The Raman myelination index
(RMI) was calculated using using non-negativity
constrained MCR in the Matlab 2014b programming environment (MathWorks).
All hyperspectral Raman images were combined into a single data set
and analyzed together. A model complexity of three components essentially
representing myelin, nonmyelinated tissue, and a residual (glass interference)
provided an optimum molecular contrast of myelin in CNS tissue. The
residuals were discarded and the two MCR components (myelin lipids
and nonmyelinated tissue) were divided to form the RMI as a measure
of the relative amount of myelin per axon area. All RMI values were
normalized to the control hemisphere.
Immunohistochemistry
For immunostaining, brain slices
were first treated with ice cold ethanol for 10 min for delipidation
and then washed in PBS three times for 5 min, before addition of blocking
solution (10% (v/v) donkey serum in TX-PBS 0.2% (v/v)). The primary
antibodies (rat anti-MBP, Serotec Cat. No. MCA409S used at 1:200;
mouse anti Beta3 Tubulin, Sigma-Aldrich Cat. No. T5076 used at 1:1000;
goat anti-IBA1, Novus Cat. No. NB100-1028 used at 1:200) were added
in blocking solution to each slide and incubated overnight at 4 °C.
After the primary antibody incubation, the slides were washed in PBS
three times for 5 min, before addition of the secondary antibody in
blocking solution for 1.5 h. After the secondary incubation, the slides
were incubated in a 1:5000 DAPI–PBS solution for 5 min before
three final washes in TX-PBS 0.2% (v/v) before mounting. All antibodies
were validated for specificity and background performing secondary
only controls on additional mouse brain sections.
Raman and Immunofluorescence
Coregistration
To enable
correlative imaging, we then developed a comprehensive Matlab library
for correlative Raman spectroscopy processing and immunofluorescence
imaging. This library enables us to spatially overlay a database of
Raman and immunofluorescence images and extract the average signature
according to a used-defined ROI. Inverse trapezoidal ROIs of the left
and right sides of the corpus callosum stained for MBP were defined
in ImageJ and used to create bounding masks for the treated and control
areas. The masked images were then linearly down sampled to match
the resolution of the Raman spectroscopic images. Finally the masks
were overlaid with the Raman spectroscopic images for correlative
imaging using ImageJ. Quantification of myelination in brain sections
for both RMI and MBP images was conducted by measuring the density
of signal in the masked areas (noninjected side vs injected side),
which was then divided by the area of the ROI. The measurements were
then used to create a ratio of signal density between treated and
untreated areas, which were then normalized on the values of control
samples and expressed as fold change for the representation. Since
for each condition we have 3 images, we pooled the RMI of the 3 replicates
using only the pixels belonging to the same region, as inferred by
the image registration. The control normalization was achieved by
dividing all RMI values by the average value for the 3 control pooled
replicates. Statistical analysis on the obtained data was performed
using one-way ANOVA with Newman–Keuls post-test.
DESI-MS Imaging
Fresh frozen tissue sections were thawed
at room temperature before being analyzed by DESI-MS. DESI-MS imaging
was performed on a Xevo G2-XS quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer
(Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) equipped with a 2D DESI stage obtained
from Prosolia Inc. (Indianapolis, IN), and a custom-built inlet capillary
heated to 490 °C. DESI parameters were optimized for best spatial
resolution on tissue and were as follows: spray voltage, 4.5 kV; solvent,
methanol/water, 95:5; flow rate, 0.5 μL/min; nebulizing gas,
nitrogen; gas pressure, 4 bar; sprayer incidence angle, 75°;
collection angle, 10°; sprayer-to-inlet distance, 8 mm; sprayer-to-sample
distance, 0.5 mm. Mass spectrometric parameters were as follows: source
temperature, 120 °C; source offset, −80 V; 4 scans/s.
Mouse brain samples were imaged at a nominal pixel size of 25 μm;
the full mouse brain sample (Figure G) and human brain samples were imaged at a nominal
pixel size of 50 μm.
MSMS Fragmentation
To identify the
significant features,
MSMS fragmentation was performed using a LTQ Orbitrap Discovery (Thermo
Fischer Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) linear ion trap equipped
with a home-built computer controlled 2D sampling stage and DESI-sprayer.
The sprayer voltage was set to 4.5 kV for both positive and negative
acquisition modes. A mixture of methanol/water (95%/5%) was delivered
with a flow rate of 1.5 μL/min and nebulized with a N2 gas pressure of 6 bar. Spectra were isolated from line scans across
a mouse brain section performed with a sample moving speed of 50 μm/s.
The identification of positive mode MSMS fragments was performed by
matching the fragmentation patterns of the compounds analyzed with
previously reported fragmentation pattern for PCs and PEs.[38] The identification of negative mode MSMS fragments
was mainly based on the mass of fatty acid carboxylate fragments.
For all features, the accurate mass was compared to the measured mass
and compounds. All compounds with a mass difference of more than 25
ppm were excluded. Whenever possible, the acquired spectra were also
compared to the MSMS fragmentation pattern provided in the Metlin
database (https://metlin.scripps.edu).
DESI-MS Data Analysis
Mass spectrometry imaging data
were imported into the Matlab (Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA) environment
and processed using an in-house toolbox.[29,39] Regions within each sample were annotated as either “control”
or “lesion”. These annotated pixels across the sample
cohort were extracted and binned to 1 Da resolution over the (phospholipid) m/z range 600–1000. Each spectrum
was normalized to its total intensity.One-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) was performed between control and lesion groups. False discovery
rate (FDR) correction was applied using the Benjamini–Hochberg–Yekutieli
(BHY) method with α = 0.05. Principal component analysis (PCA)
was used to identify trends in the data, and maximum margin criterion
linear discriminant analysis (MMC-LDA) was used to classify control
and lesion spectra. For MMC-LDA, a 10-fold internal cross validation
scheme was employed. Accurate masses and annotations of significant
features were determined by reference to the tandem MS experiments.
Annotation of the top ten most differentiating peaks for each group
and ion mode was performed using the Lipid Maps (http://www.lipidmaps.org/)
and METLIN (https://metlin.scripps.edu/index.php) databases and a mass accuracy of 15 ppm.
Raman and DESI-MS Coregistration
and Heterospectral Analysis
The mouse samples analyzed by
DESI (negative mode) and Raman were
coregistered using a fiducial marker-based alignment. Four pairs of
corresponding markers were manually marked on each of the two images.
An affine transformation was used to coregister the DESI image to
match the Raman image. Each of the individual DESI ion images was
resized and linearly interpolated using the imwarp function in Matlab
(Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA). Following coregistration, a single
region spanning the corpus callosum and “background”
was marked, with these pixels from DESI and Raman being unit vector
normalized prior to correlation analysis.[40] Correlation coefficients between DESI and Raman variables were determined.
Correlations with p > 0.05 were discounted. Finally,
we also performed a multivariate regression analysis of the normalized
Raman spectra against the individual masses using a 3 component PLS
regression with venetian blind cross validation to estimate model
complexity.
Data Availability
Supporting raw
data is available
at DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1064450.
Authors: Frank Vanrobaeys; Rudy Van Coster; Goedele Dhondt; Bart Devreese; Jozef Van Beeumen Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Kirill A Veselkov; Reza Mirnezami; Nicole Strittmatter; Robert D Goldin; James Kinross; Abigail V M Speller; Tigran Abramov; Emrys A Jones; Ara Darzi; Elaine Holmes; Jeremy K Nicholson; Zoltan Takats Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-01-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stephan Bramow; Josa M Frischer; Hans Lassmann; Nils Koch-Henriksen; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Per S Sørensen; Henning Laursen Journal: Brain Date: 2010-09-20 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Mads S Bergholt; Jean-Philippe St-Pierre; Giovanni S Offeddu; Paresh A Parmar; Michael B Albro; Jennifer L Puetzer; Michelle L Oyen; Molly M Stevens Journal: ACS Cent Sci Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 14.553
Authors: Lauren E Himmel; Troy A Hackett; Jessica L Moore; Wilson R Adams; Giju Thomas; Tatiana Novitskaya; Richard M Caprioli; Andries Zijlstra; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Kelli L Boyd Journal: ILAR J Date: 2018-12-01
Authors: Elizabeth K Neumann; Katerina V Djambazova; Richard M Caprioli; Jeffrey M Spraggins Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 3.262
Authors: Netta Vidavsky; Jennie A M R Kunitake; Maria Elena Diaz-Rubio; Aaron E Chiou; Hyun-Chae Loh; Sheng Zhang; Admir Masic; Claudia Fischbach; Lara A Estroff Journal: ACS Cent Sci Date: 2019-04-19 Impact factor: 14.553
Authors: Conor C Horgan; Anika Nagelkerke; Thomas E Whittaker; Valeria Nele; Lucia Massi; Ulrike Kauscher; Jelle Penders; Mads S Bergholt; Steve R Hood; Molly M Stevens Journal: J Mater Chem B Date: 2020-05-27 Impact factor: 6.331
Authors: Mária Péter; Wanda Török; Anna Petrovics-Balog; László Vígh; László Vécsei; Gábor Balogh Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Stuart G Higgins; Michele Becce; Alexis Belessiotis-Richards; Hyejeong Seong; Julia E Sero; Molly M Stevens Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2020-01-16 Impact factor: 30.849