Tissue architecture is intimately linked with its functions, and loss of tissue organization is often associated with pathologies. The intricate depth-dependent extracellular matrix (ECM) arrangement in articular cartilage is critical to its biomechanical functions. In this study, we developed a Raman spectroscopic imaging approach to gain new insight into the depth-dependent arrangement of native and tissue-engineered articular cartilage using bovine tissues and cells. Our results revealed previously unreported tissue complexity into at least six zones above the tidemark based on a principal component analysis and k-means clustering analysis of the distribution and orientation of the main ECM components. Correlation of nanoindentation and Raman spectroscopic data suggested that the biomechanics across the tissue depth are influenced by ECM microstructure rather than composition. Further, Raman spectroscopy together with multivariate analysis revealed changes in the collagen, glycosaminoglycan, and water distributions in tissue-engineered constructs over time. These changes were assessed using simple metrics that promise to instruct efforts toward the regeneration of a broad range of tissues with native zonal complexity and functional performance.
Tissue architecture is intimately linked with its functions, and loss of tissue organization is often associated with pathologies. The intricate depth-dependent extracellular matrix (ECM) arrangement in articular cartilage is critical to its biomechanical functions. In this study, we developed a Raman spectroscopic imaging approach to gain new insight into the depth-dependent arrangement of native and tissue-engineered articular cartilage using bovine tissues and cells. Our results revealed previously unreported tissue complexity into at least six zones above the tidemark based on a principal component analysis and k-means clustering analysis of the distribution and orientation of the main ECM components. Correlation of nanoindentation and Raman spectroscopic data suggested that the biomechanics across the tissue depth are influenced by ECM microstructure rather than composition. Further, Raman spectroscopy together with multivariate analysis revealed changes in the collagen, glycosaminoglycan, and water distributions in tissue-engineered constructs over time. These changes were assessed using simple metrics that promise to instruct efforts toward the regeneration of a broad range of tissues with native zonal complexity and functional performance.
Articular cartilage
is a smooth, avascular, and aneural connective
tissue that covers the surface of bones in synovial joints. This load-bearing
tissue ensures low friction articulation, while also absorbing and
distributing the forces transmitted through the joint to the subchondral
bone.[1] The ability of articular cartilage
to perform these diverse functions is directly linked to its intricate
depth-dependent zonal organization.[2] It
is generally accepted that the articular cartilage of skeletally mature
individuals is divided into four distinct zones, namely, the superficial
zone, midzone, and deep zone, as well as the zone of calcified cartilage.[3,4] Central to this model of the depth-dependent specification of articular
cartilage is the organization of the collagen fibrils. The fiber alignment
is parallel to the tissue surface in the superficial zone, randomly
oriented in the midzone, and aligned perpendicular to the tissue surface
in the deep zone.[5] However, a number of
studies have fueled a debate regarding the existence of additional
distinct structural regions in the most superficial zone of articular
cartilage, suggesting a higher level of complexity in the zonal organization
of the tissue than is generally appreciated.[6,7] Further,
articular cartilage zones differ in the phenotype of resident chondrocytes,[8] the biochemical composition of the extracellular
matrix (ECM),[9] and the associated mechanical
properties of the tissue.Tissue engineering approaches have
provided some clinical benefits
for patients suffering from articular cartilage damage or joint diseases
such as osteoarthritis, notably through the development of scaffolds
for improved outcome of cell-based therapies including autologous
chondrocyte implantation and marrow stimulation.[10] First generation scaffold designs have mostly produced
single-phase materials to support cartilage repair. However, efforts
to improve long-term clinical success of tissue-engineered strategies
have been increasingly focused on reproducing the zonal arrangement
of native articular cartilage, toward the aim of improving the long-term
outcome of these therapies.[11−13]Histological and immunohistochemical
evaluations of native and
engineered articular cartilage have been instrumental in assessing
the spatial distribution of major components of the ECM in cartilage
tissue engineering constructs and guiding efforts to devise strategies
to recreate the native tissue complexity. However, these methods remain
qualitative or semiquantitative in nature, require labeling, and are
not easily amenable to precise in-depth analyses of ECM component
distributions.[14,15] Biochemical quantification of
collagen and glycosaminoglycans (GAG) extracted from serial sections
of tissue has also provided insight into the depth-dependent distribution
of these major ECM constituents, but is limited in the spatial resolution
that can be reliably achieved.[16]To complement findings from these approaches, several label-free
optical techniques have been applied to the characterization of articular
cartilage including polarized light microscopy (PLM), Fourier transform
infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, optical coherence tomography (OCT),
second harmonic generation (SHG), two photon excited fluorescence
(TPEF), and Raman spectroscopy.[17−24] Raman spectroscopy is a vibrational light scattering technique that
can provide a fingerprint of the biochemical composition of cells
and tissues.[25] When incident laser light
irradiates a sample, a small fraction of the photons (∼1 in
108) is scattered inelastically with wavelength shifts
corresponding to the Raman active normal modes of the molecules.[26] Hence, Raman spectroscopic imaging enables the
extraction of a wealth of biomolecular information (i.e., specific
biochemical conformation of proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, nucleic
acids, etc.) in cells and tissues using endogenous biomolecules as
a contrast mechanism and with submicrometer spatial resolution. Further,
since Raman scattering can be described by a polarizability tensor,
controlling the polarization of the incident and detected light allows
structural information to be extracted.[27] Since Raman spectroscopy can be performed in aqueous environments,
this technique holds key advantages over FT-IR in probing highly hydrated
tissues such as articular cartilage. Raman spectroscopy has previously
been used to characterize differences in the ECM of the three main
zones of articular cartilage[23,24] and engineered cartilage,[28,29] but has yet to be exploited as an exploratory tool to gain insight
into native tissue complexity. This could help guide the development
of improved tissue engineering strategies by providing quantitative
information on the composition and collagen orientation that can be
compared to native tissue.In this study, we employed Raman
spectroscopy to evaluate both
the spatial biochemical distribution and collagen fiber orientation
across the full thickness of bovine articular cartilage. We performed
an analysis of the data set without favoring accepted models of depth-dependent
organization to gain new insight into the complex zonal arrangement
of the tissue. Nanoindentation was used to elucidate the functional
impact of the zonal arrangement of articular cartilage and the relationship
between ECM composition/structure and biomechanical properties. We
also elaborated an approach that harnesses Raman spectroscopic data
to evaluate the depth-dependent composition of tissue-engineered cartilage
constructs against that of native articular cartilage. Given mounting
efforts to replicate native tissue organization with the aim of generating
functional tissue-engineered constructs, this tool promises to guide
efforts toward the next generation of cartilage repair/regeneration
strategies. Further, the methodologies devised in this work can be
adapted to enhance engineered constructs for a broad range of applications.
Results
and Discussion
Raman Spectroscopic Imaging of Articular
Cartilage
To gain insight into the compositional and structural
properties
through the depth of native articular cartilage, we first collected
Raman spectra from regions spanning the entire cross section of mature
bovine articular cartilage samples (n = 5 animals,
2 replicates per animal, 1000 × 400 μm maps; spatial resolution
of ∼1–2 μm) (Figure ). In accordance with the literature,[23,24,30] we found Raman peaks with tentative
assignments near 795 cm–1 (DNA), 856 cm–1 (proline), 875 cm–1 (hydroxyproline; associated
with collagen), 960 cm–1 (ν1(PO4) of hydroxyapatite), 1004 cm–1 (νs(C–C) of phenylalanine), 1245 cm–1 (amide III ν(C–N) and δ(N–H) of collagen),
1410 cm–1 (νs(COO–) of GAG), 1450 cm–1 (δ(CH2) deformation
of collagen), and 1668 cm–1 (amide I ν(C=O)
of collagen) (for specific peak assignment see Table S1). By imaging the intensity of distinct bands centered
at 3400 cm–1 (H2O) (Figure S1), 1410 cm–1 (νs(COO–) of GAG), 1245 cm–1 (amide
III of collagen), 1345 cm–1 (cytoplasmic biomolecules),
795 cm–1 (DNA), and 960 cm–1 (ν1(PO4) of hydroxyapatite), we generated false-color
heat maps of the distribution of these biomolecules to enable label-free
visualization of chondrocytes and the main ECM components within the
native articular cartilage (Figure A,B). Further, we were able to identify representative
Raman spectra with marked signatures for specific articular cartilage
components including apatite-, DNA-, cytoplasm-, collagen-, and GAG-rich
areas (Figure C).
Since the Raman spectrum of cartilage ECM is largely dominated by
the collagen signal, the weaker GAG signal can be partially masked
in certain pixels (Figure C). With that in mind, we found that the bands near ∼1410
cm–1 (νs(COO–) of GAG provided a better contrast than the commonly used (νs(S=O) peak near 1061 cm–1.[23] This univariate analysis of the Raman spectroscopy
data allows a localization of the main components of articular cartilage,
namely, collagen, GAG, water, chondrocytes, and their nuclei.
Figure 1
Raman spectroscopic
imaging of articular cartilage. (A) Univariate
Raman spectroscopy images of articular cartilage showing the band
intensity associated with H2O (3400 cm–1), GAG (1410 cm–1), collagen (1245 cm–1), cytoplasm (1345 cm–1), DNA (795 cm–1), apatite (960 cm–1), and the overlay. Scale bar:
50 μm. (B) High-resolution (∼0.3 μm) Raman spectroscopy
image of chondrocytes and pericellular matrix obtained by imaging
the GAG (1410 cm–1), cytoplasm (1345 cm–1), and DNA (795 cm–1) against collagen (1245 cm–1). Scale bar: 3 μm. (C) Representative Raman
spectra measured from articular cartilage with marked signatures for
specific tissue components.
Raman spectroscopic
imaging of articular cartilage. (A) Univariate
Raman spectroscopy images of articular cartilage showing the band
intensity associated with H2O (3400 cm–1), GAG (1410 cm–1), collagen (1245 cm–1), cytoplasm (1345 cm–1), DNA (795 cm–1), apatite (960 cm–1), and the overlay. Scale bar:
50 μm. (B) High-resolution (∼0.3 μm) Raman spectroscopy
image of chondrocytes and pericellular matrix obtained by imaging
the GAG (1410 cm–1), cytoplasm (1345 cm–1), and DNA (795 cm–1) against collagen (1245 cm–1). Scale bar: 3 μm. (C) Representative Raman
spectra measured from articular cartilage with marked signatures for
specific tissue components.Raman spectroscopy primarily reveals compositional information
about samples. However, because the laser excitation was inherently
polarized at the sample in this study, using a half-waveplate we were
also able to extract information on the collagen fiber orientation
across the depth of articular cartilage. We found major differences
in the Raman spectra of the ECM in the superficial and deep zone,
emphasizing prominent changes associated with collagen Raman peaks
(e.g., 856, 943, 1245, and 1668 cm–1). To verify
that these changes were mainly caused by the plane of alignment of
the collagen fibers within the tissue relative to the laser polarization,
we measured the anisotropic Raman scattering response of the deep
extracellular matrix in a full 360° incident laser polarization
rotation (measurements taken at 30° sample rotation intervals)
(Figure A). This data
showed a clear oscillatory behavior of the amide I band. We applied
a principal component analysis (PCA) to uncover the peaks that exhibit
anisotropic Raman scattering (Figure B,C). PC1 loading and score plots revealed strong orientation
dependences relative to the laser excitation polarization, specifically
at 943 cm–1 (CCO) and 1668 cm–1 (amide I ν(C=O)). We therefore used the intensity ratio I1668/I943 as an
empirical parameter that shows the collagen orientation (see Materials and Methods). Figure D illustrates the average collagen orientation
depicted as a vector field from data of five animals (with two technical
replicates). Polarized Raman spectroscopy has previously been used
to evaluate the orientation of collagen fibers in tissues.[31] This Raman spectroscopy based evaluation of
collagen fiber orientation is in agreement with that reported by others[5,32] and was confirmed here with polarized light microscopy (PLM) of
Picrosirius red (PSR) stained sections from the same tissue (Figure E). We have also
performed second harmonic generation (SHG) images of these tissues
(Figure S2). Of note, others have reported
that the collagen orientation information that can be obtained by
SHG imaging of healthy articular cartilage is limited because of relatively
small collagen fiber diameters compared to other tissues.[33] Hence, the use of Raman spectroscopy provides
structural information that is not easily accessible with SHG in articular
cartilage. The depth-dependent collagen fiber orientation in articular
cartilage is the main parameter used in support of the accepted model
of zonal organization of articular cartilage into superficial zone,
midzone, and deep zone. Interestingly, these data showed a significant
change in the average collagen fiber orientation, as measured by the
intensity ratio I1668/I943, in the deep portion of the tissue (i.e., the depth
between 75 and 100% of the total tissue thickness) compared to the
50–75% of the total tissue thickness, which exhibits perpendicular
collagen orientation as expected in the deeper aspect of the tissues
(p < 0.001, unpaired Student’s t test) (Figure D). These results suggest a change in the collagen network
organization, with potential implications for the local mechanics
of the tissue. Further evaluations using methods complementary to
Raman spectroscopy will help elucidate the nature of structural changes
in the collagen network occurring in the deeper aspect of the tissues.
Figure 2
Collagen
fiber orientation determined by Raman scattering. (A)
Raman spectra of extracellular matrix (deep zone) in native articular
cartilage under a full polarization rotation of the incident laser
light. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) loading (PC1: 60.39%)
revealing the Raman peaks (e.g., 943 and 1668 cm–1) that show the prominent anisotropic scattering. (C) Polar diagram
of PC1 score for a full 360° polarization rotation showing the
anisotropic response of collagen fibers in articular cartilage relative
to the laser polarization. (D) Vector field derived from the empirical
ratio I1668/I943 revealing the collagen fiber orientation throughout the depth of
the tissue. These have been normalized to the full tissue depth defined
from the surface to the bone. (E) Polarized light microscopy (PLM)
from the same sample (Picrosirius red stained histological section)
showing the orientation of collagen fibers in articular cartilage.
Scale bar: 50 μm.
Collagen
fiber orientation determined by Raman scattering. (A)
Raman spectra of extracellular matrix (deep zone) in native articular
cartilage under a full polarization rotation of the incident laser
light. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) loading (PC1: 60.39%)
revealing the Raman peaks (e.g., 943 and 1668 cm–1) that show the prominent anisotropic scattering. (C) Polar diagram
of PC1 score for a full 360° polarization rotation showing the
anisotropic response of collagen fibers in articular cartilage relative
to the laser polarization. (D) Vector field derived from the empirical
ratio I1668/I943 revealing the collagen fiber orientation throughout the depth of
the tissue. These have been normalized to the full tissue depth defined
from the surface to the bone. (E) Polarized light microscopy (PLM)
from the same sample (Picrosirius red stained histological section)
showing the orientation of collagen fibers in articular cartilage.
Scale bar: 50 μm.Univariate imaging (Figure A) is inherently associated with uncertainty due to
the superimposition
of Raman peaks for different tissue biomolecules.[24] We therefore aimed to develop a robust multivariate model
using multivariate curve resolution (MCR) to characterize the biochemical
composition of native articular cartilage more accurately. MCR can
deconvolve pure biochemical components present in the tissue spectra.[34]Figure A displays the Raman spectra of laboratory grade biochemicals
and the four pure components extracted from the data using MCR and
representing apatite (MCR1: 25.80%), water (MCR2: 4.94%), GAG (MCR3:
0.45%), and collagen (MCR4: 58.06%) accounting for a total 89.25%
of the spectral variance in the Raman images. The model developed
offers an excellent agreement between the deconvolved pure component
spectra and the reference biochemicals: synthetic hydroxyapatite,
water, chondroitin sulfate, and collagen type II (correlation coefficients R2 of 0.92, 0.92, 0.95 and 0.92). The residual
spectral variance of 10.75% was mainly associated with the chondrocyte
spectral signature (i.e., cytoplasmic biomolecules and DNA) and other
minor ECM biomolecules.[23] Of note, we took
into account the anisotropic Raman scattering in the biochemical analysis
of collagen by using the total collagen content, which was calculated
as the sum of collagen fibers aligned perpendicular and parallel to
the tissue surface (see Figure S3).
Figure 3
Relative depth-dependent
biochemical distributions in native articular
cartilage measured by Raman spectroscopy. (A) Raman spectra of reference
biochemical (i.e., synthetic hydroxyapatite, demineralized H2O, chondroitin sulfate, and collagen type II). Also shown are the
extracted “pure” components from articular cartilage
using multivariate curve resolution (MCR). The correlation coefficients
were R2 = 0.92, 0.92, 0.95 and 0.92, respectively.
(B) Distribution images of collagen, GAG, H2O, and apatite
explaining a total of 89.25% of the biochemical variance in the image.
The residual was associated with cellular and minor extracellular
matrix biomolecules. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) Representative hematoxylin
and eosin (H&E), Alcian blue, and Picrosirius red stained histological
sections of the same tissue. Scale bar: 50 μm. (D) Relative
distribution of collagen, (E) GAG, and (F) H2O in native
articular cartilage across the depth of the tissue defined from the
surface (0) to the calcified cartilage (1).
Relative depth-dependent
biochemical distributions in native articular
cartilage measured by Raman spectroscopy. (A) Raman spectra of reference
biochemical (i.e., synthetic hydroxyapatite, demineralized H2O, chondroitin sulfate, and collagen type II). Also shown are the
extracted “pure” components from articular cartilage
using multivariate curve resolution (MCR). The correlation coefficients
were R2 = 0.92, 0.92, 0.95 and 0.92, respectively.
(B) Distribution images of collagen, GAG, H2O, and apatite
explaining a total of 89.25% of the biochemical variance in the image.
The residual was associated with cellular and minor extracellular
matrix biomolecules. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) Representative hematoxylin
and eosin (H&E), Alcian blue, and Picrosirius red stained histological
sections of the same tissue. Scale bar: 50 μm. (D) Relative
distribution of collagen, (E) GAG, and (F) H2O in native
articular cartilage across the depth of the tissue defined from the
surface (0) to the calcified cartilage (1).From the MCR data, we produced compositional maps for three
of
the key ECM components (i.e., collagen, GAG, and water) that illustrate
their relative spatial distribution within the articular cartilage
(Figure B). We also
reconstructed the average depth-dependent distributions ± 1 standard
deviation (SD) of these components for the five animals tested (Figure D–F). Our
results indicate an increase in the relative collagen and GAG contents
with tissue depth from the surface. Contrary to the relative GAG content,
the relative collagen content decreases in the deeper 30% portion
of articular cartilage. The relative water content is highest at the
surface and decreases abruptly in the superficial aspect of the tissue
and more gradually from the middle aspect. It must be emphasized that
since the Raman spectra are normalized, these distributions do not
report actual concentrations but rather relative amounts that reflect
the contribution of the respective biomolecules to the tissue Raman
spectra. It should also be noted that the distribution curves were
generated without discriminating between the cellular and ECM components.
The distribution profiles reported here are in agreement with observations
on the biochemical content of fetal and newborn bovine articular cartilage
evaluated by others using biochemical assays, but offer a much greater
spatial resolution.[9] While histological
evaluation enables qualitative visualization of cells, GAG, and collagen
in articular cartilage (Figure C), the Raman spectroscopy approach developed here allows
a comprehensive label-free and quantitative evaluation of both tissue
composition and structure.
Raman Spectroscopy Reveals Increased Depth-Dependent
Complexity
of Articular Cartilage
A key advantage of using Raman spectroscopy
to resolve spatial composition and organization of tissues is the
wealth of data generated that can easily be harnessed in an exploratory
manner to obtain new insight into its organization. Toward that end,
we performed PCA and k-means clustering on the Raman
spectra library generated from 10 articular cartilage samples obtained
from 5 animals (see Materials and Methods).
Briefly, k-means clustering is based on a minimization
of differences within a tissue zone and a maximization of differences
between tissue zones. Here, we performed sequential k-means clustering until further clustering stopped producing depth-dependent
zones. We calculated representative mean Raman spectra corresponding
to the various depth-dependent zones as well as mean difference spectra
between adjacent zones (Figure A,B). This analysis based on both biochemical and structural
(polarization-dependent signal) information contained within the spectra
revealed a clear depth-dependent zonal arrangement in the tissues
(Figure C). This clustering
exercise revealed a much more complex zonal arrangement than that
proposed in the literature. Based on our analysis, we report at least
six distinct depth-dependent noncalcified ECM zones based on simultaneous
evaluation of composition and structural information. We summarized
the influence of the main ECM components (from the MCR analysis) and
collagen alignment (from the univariate analysis) to each zone in Figure D. Because the clustering
algorithm distinguished the chondrocyte areas, the depth-dependent
zonal arrangement delineated here is driven by differences in the
ECM only, in contrast with average distributions presented in Figure D–F. While
some expected intra- and interanimal variation was observed including
minor changes in biochemical signatures and in the thickness of each
zone, the general arrangement and zonal sequence were very similar
between the five animals investigated (Figure S4). The reproducibility of our results across independent
animals and technical replicates suggests that the sample number used
in this study is adequate. Hence, the Raman spectroscopic approach
applied in this study provides novel quantifiable structural and biomolecular
information without prior assumptions on the articular cartilage organization.
Figure 4
Raman
spectroscopy reveals increased complexity in the zonal organization
of articular cartilage. (A) Mean Raman spectra identified for various
zones identified using k-means clustering analysis
of the normalized Raman spectra. (B) Mean difference spectra between
adjacent zones. (C) Representative k-means cluster
image of articular cartilage belonging to the individual Raman spectra.
The clustering is based on both collagen fiber orientation and biochemical
composition. (D) Schematics detailing the specific biochemical compositions
and collagen orientation belonging to different zones. Concentrations
are assigned based on the average compositions for all pixels belonging
to each cluster and rescaled to the lowest and highest values. Scale
bar: 50 μm.
Raman
spectroscopy reveals increased complexity in the zonal organization
of articular cartilage. (A) Mean Raman spectra identified for various
zones identified using k-means clustering analysis
of the normalized Raman spectra. (B) Mean difference spectra between
adjacent zones. (C) Representative k-means cluster
image of articular cartilage belonging to the individual Raman spectra.
The clustering is based on both collagen fiber orientation and biochemical
composition. (D) Schematics detailing the specific biochemical compositions
and collagen orientation belonging to different zones. Concentrations
are assigned based on the average compositions for all pixels belonging
to each cluster and rescaled to the lowest and highest values. Scale
bar: 50 μm.
Nanoindentation Reveals
Functional Insight into the Impact of
the Zonal Arrangement of Articular Cartilage
In an effort
to validate the compositional and structural findings provided by
Raman spectroscopy, we performed a functional characterization of
the mechanical response of articular cartilage across the depth of
the tissue using nanoindentation. The latter was modeled as a poroelastic
medium composed of a porous solid fraction that behaves elastically,
and a liquid phase that permeates it. The time-dependent analysis
performed allowed us to extract the elastic modulus E of the solid (Figure A), as well as its permeability to the movement of fluid within,
quantified by the hydraulic permeability K (Figure B). Both mechanical
parameters were observed to vary with depth within the tissue. Nanoindentation
showed a marked increase in the elastic modulus in the deeper aspect
of the tissues. As the proximity of the stiffer apatite-containing
interface with articular cartilage should only impact measurements
up to approximately eight times the contact radius of the nanoindenter,[35] the presence of this soft–hard tissue
interface was not an important factor in the observed increase in
elastic modulus across the depth of articular cartilage measured in
this study. This gradual increase in elastic modulus measured in the
deeper aspect of articular cartilage may contribute to the mechanical
integrity of the interface between hyaline and calcified cartilage
along with the presence of collagen fibers that bridge this interface.[36] In contrast, the hydraulic permeability of the
tissue decreased with tissue depth, suggesting that the fluid moves
with greater difficulty through the porous structure. The elastic
modulus of porous hydrated materials is expected to vary with the
concentration of solid present in the structure.[37] However, the Raman spectroscopy compositional data did
not correlate with elastic modulus values obtained from nanoindentation
(Figure C–E).
This type of behavior, whereby the elastic modulus is changing in
the absence of corresponding variations in composition, has been attributed
to changes in the underlying microstructure of the tissue.[38] No correlation was observed for the elastic
modulus with changes in the collagen anisotropy parameter I1668/I943, yet data
from the deeper aspect (bottom 30%) of the tissues revealed a trend
toward an increased elastic modulus with increased departure from
the perpendicular collagen orientation of deep zone articular cartilage
(Figure S5). While further evaluations
will be required to fully elucidate this observation, our data suggest
that tissue microstructure (via the presence of additional structural
components, cross-links, or a shift in collagen orientation), rather
than composition, influences the local elastic modulus across articular
cartilage depth.
Figure 5
Nanoindentation provides functional insight into the impact
of
zonal arrangement in articular cartilage. (A) Elastic modulus and
(B) hydraulic permeability of articular cartilage obtained by nanoindentation
and mapped through the depth of the tissue. The nanoindentation data
has been normalized to the full tissue depth defined from the surface
(0) to the calcified cartilage (1). (C–F) Correlation of the
nanoindentation data with average Raman spectroscopy MCR data on the
(C) collagen concentration, (D) GAG concentration, (E) water concentration,
and (F) collagen fiber orientation obtained for each nanoindentation
location.
Nanoindentation provides functional insight into the impact
of
zonal arrangement in articular cartilage. (A) Elastic modulus and
(B) hydraulic permeability of articular cartilage obtained by nanoindentation
and mapped through the depth of the tissue. The nanoindentation data
has been normalized to the full tissue depth defined from the surface
(0) to the calcified cartilage (1). (C–F) Correlation of the
nanoindentation data with average Raman spectroscopy MCR data on the
(C) collagen concentration, (D) GAG concentration, (E) water concentration,
and (F) collagen fiber orientation obtained for each nanoindentation
location.
Raman Spectroscopic Imaging
of Tissue Engineered Cartilaginous
Constructs
Given recent efforts in the field of cartilage
tissue engineering to recreate the zonal organization of native tissues
in an attempt to improve the functional outcome of repair constructs,[11,39,40] there is a need for methodologies
to evaluate the quality of the zonal arrangement of tissue-engineered
constructs in a quantifiable manner with high spatial resolution.
The Raman spectroscopic imaging approach developed in this work can
also be applied to instruct efforts to improve tissue-engineered cartilage
constructs. To demonstrate the potential of this approach, we formed
scaffold-free three-dimensional cartilage-like tissues by culturing
chondrocytes isolated from full thickness bovine cartilage on porous
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes for 2, 4, and 6 weeks according
to a variation on a well-established protocol.[41−43] Cartilage-like
tissues formed in this way develop a depth-dependent zonal arrangement
reminiscent of native articular cartilage over time, making this an
ideal model for the evaluation of the potential of Raman spectroscopy
in this context.We then measured Raman spectroscopic images
of the in vitro formed tissues (Figure S6) (n = 3 cell extractions, 2 technical
replicates per time point). As with the native tissues, we performed
a MCR analysis that enabled us to extract pure Raman spectra for collagen,
GAG, water, and PTFE. This data was employed to generate images (Figure A) that reflect ECM
component distributions and are similar to those observed with typical
histological staining (Figure B). Depth profiles of the relative contents of collagen, GAG,
and water of in vitro formed cartilage-like tissues
were also plotted (Figure C). To evaluate changes in depth-dependent ECM composition
of in vitro formed cartilage and inform decisions
on culture conditions toward cartilage tissue regeneration, we developed
two simple and complementary metrics that enable assessments of the
differences between the engineered constructs and native tissues (Figure ). In a first metric,
we evaluate the absolute area between the biochemical profiles of in vitro formed and native cartilage to provide insight
into the differences in the depth-dependent content of collagen, GAG,
and water (Figure A). In our model culture system, the depth-dependent GAG content
significantly improved (decreased absolute integrated area) with time
(one-way ANOVA, p < 0.01), while that of collagen
did not significantly improve (p > 0.05). The
depth
profile of water content deviated from that of the native tissue after
2 weeks in culture, likely because we did not observe improvements
in the collagen distribution to match those of the GAG distribution
(Figure B). This observation
was expected as engineered cartilage is often characterized by a lower
collagen-to-GAG ratio than the native tissue, with an associated increase
in tissue hydration. We also calculated the absolute integrated area
of the area-normalized curves as a quality parameter to provide insight
into the shape of the curves (Figure C). This parameter allows us to appreciate that the
water distribution improves with culture time (Figure D). These results indicating some improvement
in depth-dependent ECM organization are very encouraging as we selected
culture conditions that did not incorporate growth factors or other
biomolecules to drive the zonal arrangement in the tissue, in contrast
with the work by Hayes et al. (2007) in which cellular constructs
were administered frequent transforming growth factor β2.[42] Because the engineered construct spectra were
dominated by the water signal, we were prevented from extracting reliable
information about the collagen orientation in these tissues.
Figure 6
Depth-dependent
biochemical distributions in tissue-engineered
constructs measured by Raman spectroscopy. (A) Distribution images
of collagen, GAG, and H2O extracted using Raman spectroscopic
imaging and MCR analysis for each incubation time (i.e., 14, 28, and
42 days). (B) Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Alcian
blue, and Picrosirius red stained histological slides for each incubation
time. (C) Relative distribution of collagen, GAG, and H2O in the tissue engineered constructs for each incubation time. The
data has been normalized to the tissue depth defined from the surface
(0) to the calcified cartilage (1). Scale bar: 25 μm.
Figure 7
Metrics to evaluate the evolution of zonal organization
in tissue
engineered constructs. (A) The absolute zonal quality metric defined
as the absolute area between the curves for the native cartilage and in vitro formed cartilaginous constructs at each harvesting
time point. The example tissue construct curve shown is that for tissues
harvested at day 28. (B) Mean absolute zonal quality metric ±
standard deviation (SD) measured at various culture times. (C) The
relative zonal quality metric defined as the absolute integrated area
of area normalized curves between native cartilage and the cartilaginous
constructs revealing differences in the shape of the biochemical distributions.
The example tissue construct curve shown is that for tissues harvested
at day 28. (D) Mean relative zonal quality metric ± SD measured
at various time points. All curves have been normalized to the tissue
depth defined from the surface (0) to the PTFE (1). Statistical significance
was defined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post
hoc least significant differences (LSD) test, *p < 0.05 **p < 0.01, n = 3
cell extractions.
Depth-dependent
biochemical distributions in tissue-engineered
constructs measured by Raman spectroscopy. (A) Distribution images
of collagen, GAG, and H2O extracted using Raman spectroscopic
imaging and MCR analysis for each incubation time (i.e., 14, 28, and
42 days). (B) Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Alcian
blue, and Picrosirius red stained histological slides for each incubation
time. (C) Relative distribution of collagen, GAG, and H2O in the tissue engineered constructs for each incubation time. The
data has been normalized to the tissue depth defined from the surface
(0) to the calcified cartilage (1). Scale bar: 25 μm.Metrics to evaluate the evolution of zonal organization
in tissue
engineered constructs. (A) The absolute zonal quality metric defined
as the absolute area between the curves for the native cartilage and in vitro formed cartilaginous constructs at each harvesting
time point. The example tissue construct curve shown is that for tissues
harvested at day 28. (B) Mean absolute zonal quality metric ±
standard deviation (SD) measured at various culture times. (C) The
relative zonal quality metric defined as the absolute integrated area
of area normalized curves between native cartilage and the cartilaginous
constructs revealing differences in the shape of the biochemical distributions.
The example tissue construct curve shown is that for tissues harvested
at day 28. (D) Mean relative zonal quality metric ± SD measured
at various time points. All curves have been normalized to the tissue
depth defined from the surface (0) to the PTFE (1). Statistical significance
was defined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post
hoc least significant differences (LSD) test, *p < 0.05 **p < 0.01, n = 3
cell extractions.Further spectral analysis
revealed a prominent abundance of glycogen
and lipid-rich features in the cytoplasm of chondrocytes in tissue-engineered
constructs (Figure S7). We did not observe
these cellular signatures rich in glycogen and lipids in native articular
cartilage. While the cause(s) of these cellular changes remains unidentified,
it should be specified that others have observed similar appearance
of glycogen and lipid droplets in an in vivo vitamin
A induced rabbit model of osteoarthritis.[44] Suits et al. have also observed the accumulation of glycogen in
chondrocyte cultures and reported that this can be influenced by culture
conditions.[45]This work on native
and engineered cartilage constructs will be
the basis for future pragmatic developments with the aim of applying
the Raman spectroscopic approach developed herein in regenerative
medicine to generate and characterize functional tissue-engineered
cartilage constructs via optimized chondrogenic culture conditions
toward native zonal ECM arrangement and cellular signatures. We envision
that the approach developed in this study will become instrumental
for biochemical and structural quality assessment of tissue-engineered
constructs to repair articular cartilage.
Conclusions
In
summary, Raman spectroscopy offers a novel approach to elucidate
the zonal organization of articular cartilage and tissue-engineered
constructs. Here, we took advantage of Raman spectroscopy to reveal
increased depth-dependent compositional and structural complexity
in articular cartilage. We showed that the collagen, GAG, water distributions,
and collagen fibril orientation together contribute to this depth-dependent
arrangement. The absence of correlation of Raman spectroscopy data
with nanoindentation characterization of the tissues suggested that
the tissue microstructure, rather than its composition, dictates the
local elastic modulus. Further, we harnessed the quantitative nature
of Raman spectroscopic data to devise metrics to guide mounting efforts
in the field of cartilage tissue engineering to recreate the depth-dependent
ECM arrangement that is critical to articular cartilage function.
This study highlights the potential of Raman spectroscopy as an exploratory
methodology in the characterization of native tissue complexity and
tissue-engineered constructs. The methodology developed toward that
end can be applied to the evaluation of organization in a number of
tissue engineering applications.
Materials and Methods
Osteochondral
Plugs
Articular cartilage was excised
as cylindrical osteochondral plugs from the metacarpal–phalangeal
joint of mature cows (n = 5) aged 24 to 36 months
within 48 h of death. Tissues were washed 3 times for 15 min in phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) and either frozen at −80 °C immediately (for
nanoindentation) or fixed in 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS for
30 min before being stored at 4 °C in PBS until use (for Raman
spectroscopic imaging and histology). A comparison of unfixed and
prefixed tissue samples was performed to demonstrate that fixation
did not considerably affect Raman spectra of articular cartilage.
Fixation was thus used to allow repeated measurements on the same
samples over time if needed.
Chondrocyte Isolation
Articular
cartilage was excised
aseptically from the full thickness of metacarpal–phalangeal
joints of mature cows (n = 3) aged 24 to 36 months
within 48 h of death. Chondrocytes were isolated from the tissue by
sequential enzymatic digestion at 37 °C (0.2% (w/v) Pronase (Roche
Applied Science) in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
(DMEM; 4.5 g/L glucose; Invitrogen) for 1 h followed by 0.04% (w/v)
collagenase type I (Sigma) in DMEM overnight).
Substrates
Hydrophilic
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)
membranes (Millipore) encased in a cell chamber were incubated with
0.5 mg/mL collagen type II (Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.1 N acetic acid overnight
to allow full evaporation of the solution. The inserts were then washed
3 times in PBS before cell seeding.
Tissue-Engineered Constructs
The cell chambers were
placed in 24 well plates, and 750 μL of DMEM supplemented with
5% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (HyClone) was added to each well outside
the cell chamber. The isolated chondrocytes were seeded on top of
membrane inserts (1 × 106 cells in 750 μL per
membrane; 12 mm diameter) in DMEM supplemented with 5% (v/v) fetal
bovine serum and incubated at 37 °C in an atmosphere characterized
by 95% relative humidity and 5% CO2. On day 2, the medium
was supplemented with ascorbic acid (50 μg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich)
and the FBS supplementation was increased to 10% (v/v). The culture
medium was changed every 2–3 days. Cultures were harvested
at 14, 28, and 42 days. As for native articular cartilage, the in vitro cultured cartilage-like tissues were washed 3 times
for 15 min in PBS, and fixed in 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde for 30 min.
Histological Evaluation
The native and in vitro cultured cartilage were divided into two halves. The portion for
Raman spectroscopic imaging was stored at 4 °C in PBS until used,
and the portion for histology was embedded in paraffin, sectioned
at a thickness of 4 μm, and mounted on treated slides (Superfrost
Plus, Thermo Scientific). Sections were dewaxed for 5 min in xylene
and hydrated through an ethanol to distilled water series. Slides
were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for cell nuclei
and matrix, Alcian blue (AB; pH 2.5) for sulfated GAG, and Picrosirius
red (PSR) for collagen, and then imaged using an Olympus BX51 microscope
equipped with an Olympus DP70 camera. Polarized light microscopy was
performed on PSR stained sections using the same microscope.
Second
Harmonic Generation Imaging
Second harmonic
generation (SHG) imaging was performed on fixed full thickness osteochondral
plugs from mature cows. Samples were either cut perpendicular to the
surface and imaged submerged in PBS or embedded into paraffin blocks,
sectioned, and stained with Picrosirius red. Imaging was performed
on a Leica SP5 inverted confocal microscope equipped with multiple
lasers, including a 488 nm and a multiphoton laser. The multiphoton
laser was a Newport Spectra-Physics Two Photon Laser (Mai Tai DeepSee
3074) capable of being tuned from 690 to 1020 nm and generating a
pulse equal to or less than 100 fs. The Mai Tai laser was tuned to
890 nm wavelength to produce a SHG signal from type II collagen collected
at 435–455 nm, while the 488 nm laser was used to excite autofluorescence
of chondrocytes collected at 491–616 nm. All images were obtained
at a scan speed of 400 Hz using a HCX PL APO CS 40× 1.25–0.5
oil objective. Noise was reduced by collecting images at 1024 ×
1024 pixels with a line average of 4, and the signal was intensified
by accumulating 4 frames per image.
Sample Preparation for
Raman Spectroscopic Imaging
The tissues were cemented onto
a polystyrene surface using a small
quantity of cyanoacrylate so as to expose their cross section. They
were then immersed in a drop of PBS and frozen on a cryosectioning
block. Using a cryostat (Bright Instruments Ltd.), the tissues were
sectioned flat at a 45° angle relative to the articular surface
to ensure that the zonal organization observed was not an artifact
of sectioning. Once a flat tissue cross section was obtained relative
to the polystyrene surface, the samples were stored at 4 °C in
PBS until Raman spectroscopic imaging was performed. Tissue cross-section
samples imaged by Raman spectroscopy were prepared to a thickness
of more than 1 mm.
Raman Spectroscopic Imaging
The
confocal Raman microspectroscopy
system used for imaging of native cartilage and tissue-engineered
constructs consists of an upright microscope (Alpha 3000, WITec, GmbH)
equipped with a piezoelectric stage. A green laser (λex = 532 nm, WITec, GmbH) with a maximum output of 75 mW was fiber-coupled
into the microscope using a low OH single mode polarization preserving
silica fiber. The excitation laser light had a polarization ratio
of 1:100 at the sample. The measurements in this study can be regarded
as unpolarized because no polarization analyzer was used. All Raman
images were measured using a Leica 63×/0.75 water immersion objective.
Using a 50 μm ultralow OH silica fiber acting as a confocal
pinhole, the backscattered Raman signals were fed into a high-throughput
imaging spectrograph (UHTS 300, WITec, GmbH) with a 600 groove/mm
grating, equipped with a thermoelectrically cooled (−60 °C),
charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (Newton, Andor Technology Ltd.).
The system acquires Raman spectra in the range from 0 to 3700 cm–1 with a spectral resolution of ∼11 cm–1. The atomic emission lines of the argon/mercury spectral calibration
lamp (HG-1, Ocean Optics, Inc.) were used for calibration of the wavelength
axis. Pixelation noise in the Raman images was reduced using linear
interpolation.
Collagen Fiber Anisotropy Measurements
Polarized confocal
Raman spectra (n = 13) of native articular cartilage
were measured from the deep zone in a full 360° rotation (30°
intervals) of the incident laser light using a half-waveplate. Each
Raman spectrum was collected with an acquisition time of 5 s, 1 accumulation,
and a power on the sample of ∼41 mW using the 532 nm laser
excitation. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to extract
the anisotropic spectral variation from the biological Raman spectra.
The ratio of the peaks that showed highest anisotropic scattering
(i.e., 943 cm–1 (CCO) and 1668 cm–1 (amide I)) was used to estimate the collagen orientation. We calculated
an empirical metric to represent the average collagen orientation
through the depth of the tissue using the intensity ratio I1668/I943. These
values were first rescaled to one and normalized over the entire depth
of the tissues. In this way an intensity ratio of one was associated
with the alignment of collagen parallel to the surface, while an intensity
ratio of zero was associated with perpendicular alignment. The average
collagen fiber orientation angles were then calculated using arctan
of the rescaled intensity ratio at 20 data points throughout the tissue
depth. We report the average orientation combining the data from all
5 animals with two technical replicates.
Raman Spectroscopy of Tissues
and Pure Biochemical Components
Raman images (∼1000
× 400 μm (spatial resolution
of ∼2 μm)) of native articular cartilage and tissue engineered
constructs were measured by continuous scanning. Each Raman spectrum
was collected with an acquisition time of 0.3–0.5 s, 1 accumulation,
and a power on the sample of ∼41 mW using the 532 nm laser
excitation. No sample degradation was noticed using this power density.
For comparison, reference Raman spectra were also measured of chondroitin
sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich), collagen type II (Sigma-Aldrich), synthetic
hydroxyapatite (Sigma-Aldrich), 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
(DOPC) (Sigma-Aldrich), glycogen (Sigma-Aldrich), and demineralized
H2O using similar experimental parameters.
Multivariate
Statistical Analysis
Spectral analysis
was performed in the fingerprint range (700–1800 cm–1) due to its higher molecular specificity. Before multivariate statistical
analysis, the Raman spectra were preprocessed using well-established
techniques. First, to remove tissue autofluorescence, a constrained
second-order polynomial was found optimum and fitted to the raw spectrum
in the range 700–3600 cm–1, and this polynomial
was then subtracted to produce the Raman spectrum alone (this was
done in Control Four, Witec, GmbH). The extracted Raman spectrum was
then vector normalized to reduce confounding factors such as tissue
optical properties, focusing effects, collection efficiencies, and
power density variations. All Raman images were combined into a single
large data set and analyzed together using non-negativity constrained
multivariate curve resolution (MCR). Raman spectral outliers due to
cosmic rays were identified and excluded from the model using Q-residuals. MCR produces pseudo pure components without
requiring prior information.[34] For native
tissue a model complexity of five components was chosen essentially
representing collagen aligned perpendicular and parallel to the articulating
surface, GAG, H2O, and calcium phosphate based mineral.
To account for the anisotropic Raman scattering in the biochemical
analysis of collagen, the total collagen content was calculated as
the sum of collagen aligned perpendicular and parallel to the articulating
surface. The mean abundance profiles ± 1 standard deviation (SD)
extracted using MCR were compared by normalizing to the sum of total
collagen, GAG, and H2O and normalizing the distance from
the articular surface to the depth of the presence of the ν1(PO4) calcium phosphate peak at 960 cm–1 or for tissue engineered constructs, polytetrafluoroethylene at
732 cm–1. Multivariate statistical analysis and
clustering analysis were performed using PLS_Toolbox (Eigenvector
Research, Manson, WA) and in-house written scripts in the Matlab 2014b
(Mathworks, Natick, MA) programing environment on a Linux Ubuntu v15.04
multicore server (12 core, i7 3.3 Ghz processors, 64 Gb memory). Univariate
peak imaging was done in Control Four (WITec, GmbH).
Clustering
Analysis of Zonal Organization
The preprocessed normalized
spectra
were compressed using a three component PCA and fed to a k-means clustering analysis to uncover the zonal organization in cartilage
across the series of Raman images. It should be noted that the biochemical
gradients, in principle, will give rise to a continuum of clusters.
To ensure that the zones identified were genuine, we performed k-means with various numbers of clusters (with 5 replicates
to search for global minima). We chose the maximum number of clusters
that still gave rise to depth-dependent clustering of the ECM. Any
clustering related to chondrocytes was not included in the evaluation.
Nanoindentation
The time-dependent mechanical response
of articular cartilage as a result of depth within the tissue was
determined by means of displacement-control nanoindentation on a Hysitron
Ubi-1 Nanoindenter (Hysitron, USA). A diamond spherical indenter with
a radius of 50 μm was used for this purpose at an indentation
depth of 1 μm. The small indentation depth generates an effective
contact radius of approximately 7 μm. The ramp-hold profile
involved a ramp time of 5 s, followed by a hold of 20 s within which
a force plateau was reached. Tests were performed at room temperature
on n = 3 hydrated specimens, each representative
of a distinct animal. Three line scans consisting of 15 separate indents
were performed on each sample, for a total of nine scans and 135 indents.
Algorithms based on exponential curve fitting of the load–time
profile in a poroelastic framework were used for the analysis, which
yielded values for the drained elastic modulus E,
and the hydraulic permeability K of the tissues.[35]
Statistical Analysis
Statistical
significance for two
group comparisons was calculated using Student’s t test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically
significant. Prior to testing for equal variance using Levene’s
test the data was transformed to logarithmic scale. Statistical significance
for multiple comparisons was calculated using one-way analysis of
variance (ANOVA) with post hoc least significant
differences (LSD) test. p < 0.05 was considered
to be statistically significant. All statistical analysis was performed
using Origin Pro 9.1 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA).
Authors: J M Herrmann; C Pitris; B E Bouma; S A Boppart; C A Jesser; D L Stamper; J G Fujimoto; M E Brezinski Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: J A M Steele; S D McCullen; A Callanan; H Autefage; M A Accardi; D Dini; M M Stevens Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2013-12-25 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Jennie A M R Kunitake; Siyoung Choi; Kayla X Nguyen; Meredith M Lee; Frank He; Daniel Sudilovsky; Patrick G Morris; Maxine S Jochelson; Clifford A Hudis; David A Muller; Peter Fratzl; Claudia Fischbach; Admir Masic; Lara A Estroff Journal: J Struct Biol Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 2.867
Authors: Joseph A Wahlquist; Frank W DelRio; Mark A Randolph; Aaron H Aziz; Chelsea M Heveran; Stephanie J Bryant; Corey P Neu; Virginia L Ferguson Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 8.947