Shiyu Jia1,2,3, Rui Zhang2,3, Guigao Lin2,3, Rongxue Peng2,3,4, Peng Gao2,3,4, Yanxi Han2,3, Yu Fu2,3,4, Jiansheng Ding2,3,4, Qisheng Wu2,3,4, Kuo Zhang2,3, Jiehong Xie2,3, Jinming Li1,2,3. 1. Peking University Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, National Center for Clinical Laboratories, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China. 2. National Center for Clinical Laboratories, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China. 3. Beijing Engineering Research Center of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China. 4. Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: KRAS mutations are the key indicator for EGFR monoclonal antibody-targeted therapy and acquired drug resistance, and their accurate detection is critical to the clinical decision-making of colorectal cancer. However, no proper quality control material is available for the current detection methods, particularly next-generation sequencing (NGS). The ideal quality control material for NGS needs to provide both the tumor mutation gene and the matched background genomic DNA, which is uncataloged in public databases, to accurately distinguish germline polymorphisms and somatic mutations. METHODS: We developed a novel KRAS G12V mutant cell line using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) technique to make up for the deficiencies in existing quality control material and further validated the feasibility of the cell line as quality control material by amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS), Sanger sequencing, digital PCR (dPCR), and NGS. RESULTS: We verified that the edited cell line specifically had the G12V mutation, and the validation results presented a high consistency among the four methods of detection. The three cell lines screened contained the G12V mutation and the mutation allele fractions of G12V-1, G12V-2, and G12V-3 were 52.01%, 82.06%, and 17.29%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The novel KRAS G12V cell line generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system is suitable as a quality control material for all current detection methods and provides a new direction in the development of quality control material.
BACKGROUND:KRAS mutations are the key indicator for EGFR monoclonal antibody-targeted therapy and acquired drug resistance, and their accurate detection is critical to the clinical decision-making of colorectal cancer. However, no proper quality control material is available for the current detection methods, particularly next-generation sequencing (NGS). The ideal quality control material for NGS needs to provide both the tumor mutation gene and the matched background genomic DNA, which is uncataloged in public databases, to accurately distinguish germline polymorphisms and somatic mutations. METHODS: We developed a novel KRASG12V mutant cell line using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) technique to make up for the deficiencies in existing quality control material and further validated the feasibility of the cell line as quality control material by amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS), Sanger sequencing, digital PCR (dPCR), and NGS. RESULTS: We verified that the edited cell line specifically had the G12V mutation, and the validation results presented a high consistency among the four methods of detection. The three cell lines screened contained the G12V mutation and the mutation allele fractions of G12V-1, G12V-2, and G12V-3 were 52.01%, 82.06%, and 17.29%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The novel KRASG12V cell line generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system is suitable as a quality control material for all current detection methods and provides a new direction in the development of quality control material.
Authors: S T Sherry; M H Ward; M Kholodov; J Baker; L Phan; E M Smigielski; K Sirotkin Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2001-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Nishi Kothari; Michael J Schell; Jamie K Teer; Timothy Yeatman; David Shibata; Richard Kim Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Christos S Karapetis; Shirin Khambata-Ford; Derek J Jonker; Chris J O'Callaghan; Dongsheng Tu; Niall C Tebbutt; R John Simes; Haji Chalchal; Jeremy D Shapiro; Sonia Robitaille; Timothy J Price; Lois Shepherd; Heather-Jane Au; Christiane Langer; Malcolm J Moore; John R Zalcberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-10-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Luis A Diaz; Richard T Williams; Jian Wu; Isaac Kinde; J Randolph Hecht; Jordan Berlin; Benjamin Allen; Ivana Bozic; Johannes G Reiter; Martin A Nowak; Kenneth W Kinzler; Kelly S Oliner; Bert Vogelstein Journal: Nature Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean Journal: Nature Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Li Tai Fang; Bin Zhu; Yongmei Zhao; Wanqiu Chen; Zhaowei Yang; Liz Kerrigan; Kurt Langenbach; Maryellen de Mars; Charles Lu; Kenneth Idler; Howard Jacob; Yuanting Zheng; Luyao Ren; Ying Yu; Erich Jaeger; Gary P Schroth; Ogan D Abaan; Keyur Talsania; Justin Lack; Tsai-Wei Shen; Zhong Chen; Seta Stanbouly; Bao Tran; Jyoti Shetty; Yuliya Kriga; Daoud Meerzaman; Cu Nguyen; Virginie Petitjean; Marc Sultan; Margaret Cam; Monika Mehta; Tiffany Hung; Eric Peters; Rasika Kalamegham; Sayed Mohammad Ebrahim Sahraeian; Marghoob Mohiyuddin; Yunfei Guo; Lijing Yao; Lei Song; Hugo Y K Lam; Jiri Drabek; Petr Vojta; Roberta Maestro; Daniela Gasparotto; Sulev Kõks; Ene Reimann; Andreas Scherer; Jessica Nordlund; Ulrika Liljedahl; Roderick V Jensen; Mehdi Pirooznia; Zhipan Li; Chunlin Xiao; Stephen T Sherry; Rebecca Kusko; Malcolm Moos; Eric Donaldson; Zivana Tezak; Baitang Ning; Weida Tong; Jing Li; Penelope Duerken-Hughes; Claudia Catalanotti; Shamoni Maheshwari; Joe Shuga; Winnie S Liang; Jonathan Keats; Jonathan Adkins; Erica Tassone; Victoria Zismann; Timothy McDaniel; Jeffrey Trent; Jonathan Foox; Daniel Butler; Christopher E Mason; Huixiao Hong; Leming Shi; Charles Wang; Wenming Xiao Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2021-09-09 Impact factor: 68.164