Literature DB >> 34504347

Establishing community reference samples, data and call sets for benchmarking cancer mutation detection using whole-genome sequencing.

Li Tai Fang1, Bin Zhu2, Yongmei Zhao3, Wanqiu Chen4, Zhaowei Yang4,5, Liz Kerrigan6, Kurt Langenbach6, Maryellen de Mars6, Charles Lu7, Kenneth Idler7, Howard Jacob7, Yuanting Zheng8, Luyao Ren8, Ying Yu8, Erich Jaeger9, Gary P Schroth9, Ogan D Abaan9, Keyur Talsania3, Justin Lack3, Tsai-Wei Shen3, Zhong Chen4, Seta Stanbouly4, Bao Tran10, Jyoti Shetty10, Yuliya Kriga10, Daoud Meerzaman11, Cu Nguyen11, Virginie Petitjean12, Marc Sultan12, Margaret Cam13, Monika Mehta10, Tiffany Hung14, Eric Peters14, Rasika Kalamegham14, Sayed Mohammad Ebrahim Sahraeian1, Marghoob Mohiyuddin1, Yunfei Guo1, Lijing Yao1, Lei Song2, Hugo Y K Lam1, Jiri Drabek15,16, Petr Vojta15,16, Roberta Maestro16,17, Daniela Gasparotto16,17, Sulev Kõks16,18,19, Ene Reimann16,19, Andreas Scherer16,20, Jessica Nordlund16,21, Ulrika Liljedahl16,21, Roderick V Jensen22, Mehdi Pirooznia23, Zhipan Li24, Chunlin Xiao25, Stephen T Sherry25, Rebecca Kusko26, Malcolm Moos27, Eric Donaldson28, Zivana Tezak29, Baitang Ning30, Weida Tong30, Jing Li5, Penelope Duerken-Hughes31, Claudia Catalanotti32, Shamoni Maheshwari32, Joe Shuga32, Winnie S Liang33, Jonathan Keats33, Jonathan Adkins33, Erica Tassone33, Victoria Zismann33, Timothy McDaniel33, Jeffrey Trent33, Jonathan Foox34, Daniel Butler34, Christopher E Mason34, Huixiao Hong35, Leming Shi36, Charles Wang37,38, Wenming Xiao39.   

Abstract

The lack of samples for generating standardized DNA datasets for setting up a sequencing pipeline or benchmarking the performance of different algorithms limits the implementation and uptake of cancer genomics. Here, we describe reference call sets obtained from paired tumor-normal genomic DNA (gDNA) samples derived from a breast cancer cell line-which is highly heterogeneous, with an aneuploid genome, and enriched in somatic alterations-and a matched lymphoblastoid cell line. We partially validated both somatic mutations and germline variants in these call sets via whole-exome sequencing (WES) with different sequencing platforms and targeted sequencing with >2,000-fold coverage, spanning 82% of genomic regions with high confidence. Although the gDNA reference samples are not representative of primary cancer cells from a clinical sample, when setting up a sequencing pipeline, they not only minimize potential biases from technologies, assays and informatics but also provide a unique resource for benchmarking 'tumor-only' or 'matched tumor-normal' analyses.
© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34504347      PMCID: PMC8532138          DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-00993-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   68.164


  53 in total

Review 1.  Implementing Genome-Driven Oncology.

Authors:  David M Hyman; Barry S Taylor; José Baselga
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Integrating human sequence data sets provides a resource of benchmark SNP and indel genotype calls.

Authors:  Justin M Zook; Brad Chapman; Jason Wang; David Mittelman; Oliver Hofmann; Winston Hide; Marc Salit
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Human genome sequence.

Authors:  J G Gall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Comprehensive Characterization of Cancer Driver Genes and Mutations.

Authors:  Matthew H Bailey; Collin Tokheim; Eduard Porta-Pardo; Sohini Sengupta; Denis Bertrand; Amila Weerasinghe; Antonio Colaprico; Michael C Wendl; Jaegil Kim; Brendan Reardon; Patrick Kwok-Shing Ng; Kang Jin Jeong; Song Cao; Zixing Wang; Jianjiong Gao; Qingsong Gao; Fang Wang; Eric Minwei Liu; Loris Mularoni; Carlota Rubio-Perez; Niranjan Nagarajan; Isidro Cortés-Ciriano; Daniel Cui Zhou; Wen-Wei Liang; Julian M Hess; Venkata D Yellapantula; David Tamborero; Abel Gonzalez-Perez; Chayaporn Suphavilai; Jia Yu Ko; Ekta Khurana; Peter J Park; Eliezer M Van Allen; Han Liang; Michael S Lawrence; Adam Godzik; Nuria Lopez-Bigas; Josh Stuart; David Wheeler; Gad Getz; Ken Chen; Alexander J Lazar; Gordon B Mills; Rachel Karchin; Li Ding
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  The emerging clinical relevance of genomics in cancer medicine.

Authors:  Michael F Berger; Elaine R Mardis
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Lessons from the cancer genome.

Authors:  Levi A Garraway; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.

Authors:  Ariane L Hofmann; Jonas Behr; Jochen Singer; Jack Kuipers; Christian Beisel; Peter Schraml; Holger Moch; Niko Beerenwinkel
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Reliability of Whole-Exome Sequencing for Assessing Intratumor Genetic Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Weiwei Shi; Charlotte K Y Ng; Raymond S Lim; Tingting Jiang; Sushant Kumar; Xiaotong Li; Vikram B Wali; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Mark B Gerstein; Anees B Chagpar; Britta Weigelt; Lajos Pusztai; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Christos Hatzis
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Comparing somatic mutation-callers: beyond Venn diagrams.

Authors:  Su Yeon Kim; Terence P Speed
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.

Authors:  Anne Bruun Krøigård; Mads Thomassen; Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm; Torben A Kruse; Martin Jakob Larsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Deep oncopanel sequencing reveals within block position-dependent quality degradation in FFPE processed samples.

Authors:  Yifan Zhang; Thomas M Blomquist; Rebecca Kusko; Daniel Stetson; Zhihong Zhang; Lihui Yin; Robert Sebra; Binsheng Gong; Jennifer S Lococo; Vinay K Mittal; Natalia Novoradovskaya; Ji-Youn Yeo; Nicole Dominiak; Jennifer Hipp; Amelia Raymond; Fujun Qiu; Hanane Arib; Melissa L Smith; Jay E Brock; Daniel H Farkas; Daniel J Craig; Erin L Crawford; Dan Li; Tom Morrison; Nikola Tom; Wenzhong Xiao; Mary Yang; Christopher E Mason; Todd A Richmond; Wendell Jones; Donald J Johann; Leming Shi; Weida Tong; James C Willey; Joshua Xu
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 17.906

2.  Development of a Novel Reference Material for Tumor Mutational Burden Measurement Based on CRISPR/Cas9 Technology.

Authors:  Rongxue Peng; Guigao Lin; Lin Li; Jinming Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Whole genome and exome sequencing reference datasets from a multi-center and cross-platform benchmark study.

Authors:  Yongmei Zhao; Li Tai Fang; Tsai-Wei Shen; Sulbha Choudhari; Keyur Talsania; Xiongfong Chen; Jyoti Shetty; Yuliya Kriga; Bao Tran; Bin Zhu; Zhong Chen; Wanqiu Chen; Charles Wang; Erich Jaeger; Daoud Meerzaman; Charles Lu; Kenneth Idler; Luyao Ren; Yuanting Zheng; Leming Shi; Virginie Petitjean; Marc Sultan; Tiffany Hung; Eric Peters; Jiri Drabek; Petr Vojta; Roberta Maestro; Daniela Gasparotto; Sulev Kõks; Ene Reimann; Andreas Scherer; Jessica Nordlund; Ulrika Liljedahl; Jonathan Foox; Christopher E Mason; Chunlin Xiao; Huixiao Hong; Wenming Xiao
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 6.444

4.  The Sequencing Quality Control 2 study: establishing community standards for sequencing in precision medicine.

Authors:  Tim R Mercer; Joshua Xu; Christopher E Mason; Weida Tong
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 5.  Towards accurate and reliable resolution of structural variants for clinical diagnosis.

Authors:  Zhichao Liu; Ruth Roberts; Timothy R Mercer; Joshua Xu; Fritz J Sedlazeck; Weida Tong
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 17.906

6.  Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample.

Authors:  Sayed Mohammad Ebrahim Sahraeian; Li Tai Fang; Konstantinos Karagiannis; Malcolm Moos; Sean Smith; Luis Santana-Quintero; Chunlin Xiao; Michael Colgan; Huixiao Hong; Marghoob Mohiyuddin; Wenming Xiao
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Accurate somatic variant detection using weakly supervised deep learning.

Authors:  Kiran Krishnamachari; Dylan Lu; Alexander Swift-Scott; Anuar Yeraliyev; Kayla Lee; Weitai Huang; Sim Ngak Leng; Anders Jacobsen Skanderup
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 17.694

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.