Literature DB >> 29378936

Child first language and adult second language are both tied to general-purpose learning systems.

Phillip Hamrick1, Jarrad A G Lum2, Michael T Ullman3.   

Abstract

Do the mechanisms underlying language in fact serve general-purpose functions that preexist this uniquely human capacity? To address this contentious and empirically challenging issue, we systematically tested the predictions of a well-studied neurocognitive theory of language motivated by evolutionary principles. Multiple metaanalyses were performed to examine predicted links between language and two general-purpose learning systems, declarative and procedural memory. The results tied lexical abilities to learning only in declarative memory, while grammar was linked to learning in both systems in both child first language and adult second language, in specific ways. In second language learners, grammar was associated with only declarative memory at lower language experience, but with only procedural memory at higher experience. The findings yielded large effect sizes and held consistently across languages, language families, linguistic structures, and tasks, underscoring their reliability and validity. The results, which met the predicted pattern, provide comprehensive evidence that language is tied to general-purpose systems both in children acquiring their native language and adults learning an additional language. Crucially, if language learning relies on these systems, then our extensive knowledge of the systems from animal and human studies may also apply to this domain, leading to predictions that might be unwarranted in the more circumscribed study of language. Thus, by demonstrating a role for these systems in language, the findings simultaneously lay a foundation for potentially important advances in the study of this critical domain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  declarative memory; domain-general; language; learning; procedural memory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29378936      PMCID: PMC5816159          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1713975115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  44 in total

1.  Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out?

Authors:  James L. McClelland; Karalyn Patterson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Specific language impairment is not specific to language: the procedural deficit hypothesis.

Authors:  Michael T Ullman; Elizabeth I Pierpont
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Relationship of reading achievement to verbal processing abilities.

Authors:  J L De Soto; C B De Soto
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  1983-02

5.  Exploration of serial structure procedural learning in children with language impairment.

Authors:  Audrey Gabriel; Christelle Maillart; Melody Guillaume; Nicolas Stefaniak; Thierry Meulemans
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  An alternative to domain-general or domain-specific frameworks for theorizing about human evolution and ontogenesis.

Authors:  Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Journal:  AIMS Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-19

7.  Procedural Learning and Individual Differences in Language.

Authors:  Joanna C Lee; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2015-07-01

8.  Cognitive and physiological substrates of impaired sentence processing in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  M Grossman; S Carvell; S Gollomp; M B Stern; M Reivich; D Morrison; A Alavi; H I Hurtig
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The evolution of syntax: an exaptationist perspective.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Front Evol Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-23

10.  Enhanced recognition memory after incidental encoding in children with developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Martina Hedenius; Michael T Ullman; Per Alm; Margareta Jennische; Jonas Persson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Seeing problems that may not exist: A reply to West et al.'s (2018) questioning of the procedural deficit hypothesis.

Authors:  Christopher M Conway; Joanne Arciuli; Jarrad A G Lum; Michael T Ullman
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2019-03-10

2.  Study protocol: a comprehensive multi-method neuroimaging approach to disentangle developmental effects and individual differences in second language learning.

Authors:  W M Menks; C Ekerdt; G Janzen; E Kidd; K Lemhöfer; G Fernández; J M McQueen
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-07-08

Review 3.  A New Memory Perspective on the Sentence Comprehension Deficits of School-Age Children With Developmental Language Disorder: Implications for Theory, Assessment, and Intervention.

Authors:  James W Montgomery; Ronald B Gillam; Julia L Evans
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Linking Adult Second Language Learning and Diachronic Change: A Cautionary Note.

Authors:  Vera Kempe; Patricia J Brooks
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-05

5.  Simultaneous Acquisition of Words and Syntax: Effects of Exposure Condition and Declarative Memory.

Authors:  Simón Ruiz; Kaitlyn M Tagarelli; Patrick Rebuschat
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-12

6.  Learning and Consolidation of Declarative Memory in Good and Poor Readers of English as a Second Language.

Authors:  Kuppuraj Sengottuvel; Arpitha Vasudevamurthy; Michael T Ullman; F Sayako Earle
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-17

7.  Contributions of common genetic variants to specific languages and to when a language is learned.

Authors:  Patrick C M Wong; Xin Kang; Hon-Cheong So; Kwong Wai Choy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Second Graders' Grapho-Motor Skill Learning and Verbal Learning: The Effects of Socio-Educational Factors.

Authors:  Chagit Hollander; Esther Adi-Japha
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-10-12

9.  A Daytime Nap Does Not Enhance the Retention of a First-Order or Second-Order Motor Sequence.

Authors:  Michael P Barham; Jarrad A G Lum; Russell Conduit; Lara Fernadez; Peter G Enticott; Gillian M Clark
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Measuring individual differences in cognitive abilities in the lab and on the web.

Authors:  Simón Ruiz; Xiaobin Chen; Patrick Rebuschat; Detmar Meurers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.