| Literature DB >> 29375914 |
Yongxin Li1, Ya Wang1, Chenxi Liao2, Wenhua Huang1, Ping Wu2.
Abstract
In clinical practice, the effectiveness of the rehabilitation therapy such as acupuncture combining conventional Western medicine (AG) on stroke people's motor-related brain network and their behaviors has not been systematically studied. In the present study, seventeen adult ischemic patients were collected and divided into two groups: the conventional Western medicine treatment group (CG) and the AG. The neurological deficit scores (NDS) and resting-state functional MRI data were collected before and after treatment. Compared with the CG patients, AG patients exhibited a significant enhancement of the percent changes of NDS from pre- to posttreatment intervention. All patients showed significant changes of functional connectivity (FC) between the pair of cortical motor-related regions. After treatment, both patient groups showed a recovery of brain connectivity to the nearly normal level compared with the controls in these pairs. Moreover, a significant correlation between the percent changes of NDS and the pretreatment FC values of bilateral primary motor cortex (M1) in all patients was found. In conclusion, our results showed that AG therapy can be an effective means for ischemic stroke patients to recover their motor function ability. The FC strengths between bilateral M1 of stroke patients can predict stroke patients' treatment outcome after rehabilitation therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29375914 PMCID: PMC5742470 DOI: 10.1155/2017/5816263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Demographic and imaging data.
| Patient number | Dominant hand | Affected hand | Site of lesion | Lesion volume (mm3) | Lesion age (days) | NDS1 | NDS2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AG | |||||||
| 1 | R | R | L Pons/CS | 350 | 135 | 13 | 5 |
| 2 | R | R | L/R TH | 420 | 22 | 31 | 20 |
| 3 | R | R | L BG | 1180 | 33 | 26 | 12 |
| 4 | R | R | L BG | 3120 | 21 | 19 | 9 |
| 5 | R | R | L BG/CS | 1350 | 22 | 26 | 15 |
| 6 | R | R | L BG/CS | 200 | 36 | — | — |
| 7 | R | L | R BG | 2240 | 32 | 21 | 10 |
| 8 | R | R | L TH/LN | 1890 | 148 | 24 | 14 |
| CG | |||||||
| 9 | R | R | L BG | 380 | 56 | 24 | 16 |
| 10 | R | R | L BG | 1190 | 45 | 26 | 23 |
| 11 | R | R | L BG | 540 | 26 | 24 | 18 |
| 12 | R | R | L BG | 1130 | 132 | 20 | 12 |
| 13 | R | R | L TH | 290 | 21 | 25 | 18 |
| 14 | R | R | L BG | 280 | 23 | 24 | 12 |
| 15 | R | R | L CN | 450 | 25 | 15 | 6 |
| 16 | R | R | L CS | 250 | 23 | 22 | 14 |
| 17 | R | R | L BG | 1260 | 23 | — | — |
BG: basal ganglia; CN: caudate nucleus; CS: centrum semiovale; LN: lenticular nucleus; F: female; NDS: neurological deficit scores; L: left; M: male; R: right; TH: thalamus.
Regions of interest for the major cortical motor-related areas.
| ID | Regions | Abbreviation | Side | MNI coordinate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 1 | Supplementary motor area | SMA | L | −5 | −4 | 57 |
| 2 | Supplementary motor area | SMA | R | 5 | −4 | 57 |
| 3 | Primary motor cortex | M1 | L | −38 | −22 | 56 |
| 4 | Primary motor cortex | M1 | R | 38 | −22 | 56 |
| 5 | Postcentral gyrus | PCG | L | −37 | −34 | 53 |
| 6 | Postcentral gyrus | PCG | R | 37 | −34 | 53 |
| 7 | Dorsolateral Premotor | PMd | L | −22 | −13 | 57 |
| 8 | Dorsolateral Premotor | PMd | R | 28 | −10 | 54 |
| 9 | Ventrolateral Premotor | PMv | L | −49 | −1 | 38 |
| 10 | Ventrolateral Premotor | PMv | R | 53 | 0 | 25 |
The regions were selected from previous studies (Jiang et al. [22] and Wang et al. [21]). The location of each region of interest with a 5-radius sphere. L: left; R: right; MNI: Montreal Neurological Institute.
Figure 1The location of the regions of interest in the motor-related network used in this study. R: right hemisphere.
Figure 2The longitudinal changes of NDS performance with different intervention therapies. Paired t-test analyses showed significant decrease of NDS scores from pre- to posttreatment in CG (a) and AG (b). The percent changes of NDS in patients with AG showed a significant enhancement compared with those in patients with CG (c). ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
Figure 3Functional connectivity comparison between groups. Significant interhemisphere connectivity (a–c) and intrahemisphere connectivity (d–f) of the motor network were found for both patients groups comparing with the controls. ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01.
Figure 4Brain and behavioral correlation. Significant positive correlation was found between the percent changes of NDS and the pretreatment M1-M1 FC values. L: left hemisphere, R: right hemisphere.