| Literature DB >> 33707406 |
Yumei Xia1, Gelun Huang1, Xuemei Quan1, Qixiong Qin1, Hui Li1, Ci Xu1, Zhijian Liang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combined effects of bilateral corticospinal tract (CST) reorganization and interhemispheric functional connectivity (FC) reorganization on motor recovery of upper and lower limbs after stroke remain unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 34 patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination at weeks 1, 4, and 12 after stroke, with a control group of 34 healthy subjects receiving 1 MRI examination. Interhemispheric FC in the somatomotor network (SMN) was calculated using the resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI). Fractional anisotropy (FA) of bilateral CST was recorded as a measure of reorganization obtained from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). After intergroup comparisons, multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the effects of altered FA and interhemispheric FC on motor recovery. RESULTS Interhemispheric FC restoration mostly occurred within 4 weeks after stroke, and FA in ipsilesional remained CST consistently elevated within 12 weeks. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that the increase in both interhemispheric FC and ipsilesional CST-FA were significantly correlated with greater motor recovery from week 1 to week 4 following stroke. Moreover, only increased FA of ipsilesional CST was significantly correlated with greater motor recovery during weeks 4 to 12 after stroke compared to interhemispheric FC. CONCLUSIONS Our results show dynamic structural and functional reorganizations following motor stroke, and structure reorganization may be more related to motor recovery at the late subacute phase. These results may play a role in guiding neurological rehabilitation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33707406 PMCID: PMC7962416 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.929092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1Lesion overlapped across the 34 stroke patients. Color bar indicates the number of subjects having lesions in each voxel.
Figure 2Patient selection.
Baseline characteristics of patients and controls.
| Characteristics | Patients, n=34 | Controls, n=34 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 63.4 [52.1–73.8] | 61.2 [49.3–70.5] | 0.532 |
| Female N (%) | 14 (41.2%) | 16 (47.1%) | 0.808 |
| Vascular risk factors N (%) | |||
| Hypertension | 23 (67.6%) | 18 (52.9%) | 0.215 |
| Diabetes | 19 (55.9%) | 13 (38.2%) | 0.145 |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 20 (58.8%) | 15 (44.1%) | 0.225 |
| NIHSS admission | 7 [ | – | – |
| MMSE | ≥21 | – | – |
| Lesion size (cm3) | 9.4 [3.2–35.1] | – | – |
| Lesion side (left) N (%) | 18 (52.9%) | – | – |
NIHSS – National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; MMSE – Mini-Mental State Examination. Continuous variables presented as median [P25–P75].
Assessed by Mann-Whitney U test;
assessed by chi-square test.
Figure 3Changes over time. FA – fractional anisotropy, FMA – Fugl-Meyer Assessment, FC – functional connectivity. FA values increased longitudinally in ipsilesional CST (A). Interhemispheric FC restoration happened mostly within 4 weeks after stroke (B). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scores of stroke patients improved gradually (C).
Clinical and imaging indicators of subjects at different time points.
| Controls (n=34) | Patients W1 (n=34) | Patients W4 (n=34) | Patients W12 (n=34) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMA (0–100) | – | 51.315±9.209 | 73.355±8.854 | 89.703±7.870 |
| Barthel index (0–100) | – | 54.732±12.937 | 77.708±8.634 | 86.368±14.409 |
| Interhemispheric FC | 1.01±0.043 | 0.587±0.119 | 0.929±0.077 | 0.969±0.093 |
| FA in ipsilesional CST | 0.547±0.058 | 0.448±0.029 | 0.492±0.033 | 0.544±0.045 |
| FA in contralesional CST | 0.547±0.058 | 0.538±0.055 | 0.544±0.048 | 0.548±0.040 |
FA – fractional anisotropy; FMA – Fugl-Meyer Assessment; FC – functional connectivity. The FA of healthy controls were derived from averages of bilateral CST measurements.
Compared with the control group, P<0.05 obtained by two-sample independent t tests;
compared with week 1, P<0.05 obtained by RM-ANOVA;
compared with week 4, P<0.05 obtained by RM-ANOVA.
Figure 4FA pseudocolor pictures of one stroke patient at W1, W4, W12, levels of the internal capsule. Arrows indicate the increased FA in the perilesional CST.
Figure 5Significantly positive correlation between percentage changes of FA in ipsilesional remaining CST and those of interhemispheric FC during weeks 1 to 4 after stroke (A). No correlation between them from weeks 4 to 12 (B). FA – fractional anisotropy, FC – functional connectivity, CST – corticospinal tract.
Multiple linear regression of factors influencing motor recovery.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 0.701 | R2 | 0.309 |
| Total ( | <0.001 | Total ( | <0.001 |
| Percentage changes of FA(W1–W4) | 0.304 (0.011) | Percentage changes of FA(W4–W12) | 0.557 (0.001) |
| Percentage changes of interhemispheric FC(W1–W4) | 0.647 (<0.001) | Percentage changes of interhemispheric FC(W4–W12) | 0.086 (0.571) |
Beta – standardized regression coefficients. Model 1 with percentage changes of FMA(W1–W4) as dependent variable. Model 2 with percentage changes of FMA(W4–W12) as dependent variable.