Literature DB >> 20373348

Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after stroke.

Alex R Carter1, Serguei V Astafiev, Catherine E Lang, Lisa T Connor, Jennifer Rengachary, Michael J Strube, Daniel L W Pope, Gordon L Shulman, Maurizio Corbetta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Focal brain lesions can have important remote effects on the function of distant brain regions. The resulting network dysfunction may contribute significantly to behavioral deficits observed after stroke. This study investigates the behavioral significance of changes in the coherence of spontaneous activity in distributed networks after stroke by measuring resting state functional connectivity (FC) using functional magnetic resonance imaging.
METHODS: In acute stroke patients, we measured FC in a dorsal attention network and an arm somatomotor network, and determined the correlation of FC with performance obtained in a separate session on tests of attention and motor function. In particular, we compared the behavioral correlation with intrahemispheric FC to the behavioral correlation with interhemispheric FC.
RESULTS: In the attention network, disruption of interhemispheric FC was significantly correlated with abnormal detection of visual stimuli (Pearson r with field effect = -0.624, p = 0.002). In the somatomotor network, disruption of interhemispheric FC was significantly correlated with upper extremity impairment (Pearson r with contralesional Action Research Arm Test = 0.527, p = 0.036). In contrast, intrahemispheric FC within the normal or damaged hemispheres was not correlated with performance in either network. Quantitative lesion analysis demonstrated that our results could not be explained by structural damage alone.
INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that lesions cause state changes in the spontaneous functional architecture of the brain, and constrain behavioral output. Clinically, these results validate using FC for assessing the health of brain networks, with implications for prognosis and recovery from stroke, and underscore the importance of interhemispheric interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20373348      PMCID: PMC2927671          DOI: 10.1002/ana.21905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  43 in total

1.  Neuronal activity in the lateral intraparietal area and spatial attention.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Grip strength as measured by the Jamar dynamometer.

Authors:  R T Schmidt; J V Toews
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 3.  Topography of cognition: parallel distributed networks in primate association cortex.

Authors:  P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research.

Authors:  R C Lyle
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 5.  The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection.

Authors:  M F S Rushworth; H Johansen-Berg; S M Göbel; J T Devlin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner; J A Walker; F J Friedrich; R D Rafal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain.

Authors:  M I Posner; S E Petersen; P T Fox; M E Raichle
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-17       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Nagako Murase; Julie Duque; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  The Mobility Scale for Acute Stroke Patients: concurrent validity.

Authors:  J A Simondson; P Goldie; K M Greenwood
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.477

View more
  297 in total

1.  Large-scale changes in network interactions as a physiological signature of spatial neglect.

Authors:  Antonello Baldassarre; Lenny Ramsey; Carl L Hacker; Alicia Callejas; Serguei V Astafiev; Nicholas V Metcalf; Kristi Zinn; Jennifer Rengachary; Abraham Z Snyder; Alex R Carter; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Focal brain lesions to critical locations cause widespread disruption of the modular organization of the brain.

Authors:  Caterina Gratton; Emi M Nomura; Fernando Pérez; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The left occipitotemporal cortex does not show preferential activity for words.

Authors:  Alecia C Vogel; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  A brief history of the resting state: the Washington University perspective.

Authors:  Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Increased functional connectivity indicates the severity of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  David J Hawellek; Joerg F Hipp; Christopher M Lewis; Maurizio Corbetta; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Dynamic brain structural changes after left hemisphere subcortical stroke.

Authors:  Fengmei Fan; Chaozhe Zhu; Hai Chen; Wen Qin; Xunming Ji; Liang Wang; Yujin Zhang; Litao Zhu; Chunshui Yu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Multimodal MRI of nonhuman primate stroke.

Authors:  Hsiao-Ying Wey; Timothy Q Duong
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 8.  Translational MR Neuroimaging of Stroke and Recovery.

Authors:  Emiri T Mandeville; Cenk Ayata; Yi Zheng; Joseph B Mandeville
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 6.829

9.  Low-Frequency Oscillations Are a Biomarker of Injury and Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Anirudh Wodeyar; Jennifer Wu; Kiranjot Kaur; Ashley K Masuda; Ramesh Srinivasan; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 10.  Cerebral network disorders after stroke: evidence from imaging-based connectivity analyses of active and resting brain states in humans.

Authors:  Anne K Rehme; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.