| Literature DB >> 25452777 |
Yanling Gao1, Zhicheng Lin1, Jing Tao2, Shanli Yang1, Ri Chen3, Cai Jiang4, Keng Dong1, Jia Huang2, Lidian Chen2.
Abstract
According to Traditional Chinese Medicine there is an optimum time to administer acupuncture at a particular acupoint. The present study used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the timing effects of acupuncture at the Zusanli (ST36) acupoint. A total of 10 healthy volunteers and 10 post-stroke patients were recruited. The subjects received acupuncture stimulation at ST36 during two time periods: between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. (the AM condition) and between 3:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. (the PM condition), seven days later. Blood oxygenation level-dependent signals were captured while the patient was receiving the acupuncture stimulation. The results showed a stronger activation in the AM condition than in the PM condition in both healthy and stroke subjects. The significant regions in the healthy subjects included the prefrontal cortex, cingulum, thalamus and cerebellum; for the stroke patients, the significant regions were the cuneus, supplementary motor area and inferior parietal gyrus. Timing can therefore modulate brain activation patterns during acupuncture in healthy subjects and stroke patients; however, the modulation effect appears to differ between the two subject groups. Further studies are required to explore the timing effects of acupuncture at different acupoints in different populations.Entities:
Keywords: acupuncture; functional magnetic resonance imaging; stroke; timing effect
Year: 2014 PMID: 25452777 PMCID: PMC4247279 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2014.2056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Demographics of the stroke subjects.
| Ischemic stroke | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Patient no. | FM-UL | Gender | Age (years) | Side | Area | Days after stroke |
| 1 | 16 | M | 45 | R | Basal ganglia, internal capsule | 221 |
| 2 | 12 | M | 66 | R | Basal ganglia, internal capsule, corona radiate | 195 |
| 3 | 14 | F | 70 | R | Basal ganglia, internal capsule | 243 |
| 4 | 13 | F | 57 | R | Basal ganglia, internal capsule, corona radiate | 186 |
| 5 | 15 | F | 42 | R | Basal ganglia, internal capsule | 210 |
| 6 | 11 | M | 69 | R | Basal ganglia, internal capsule | 218 |
| 7 | 10 | F | 54 | R | Basal ganglia, internal capsule, corona radiate | 237 |
| 8 | 12 | M | 59 | R | Basal ganglia, internal capsule | 204 |
| 9 | 9 | M | 67 | R | Basal ganglia, internal capsule, corona radiate | 188 |
| 10 | 15 | F | 52 | R | Basal ganglia, internal capsule | 242 |
FM-UL, lower limb section of the Fugl-Meyer Scale; M, male; F, female; R, right.
Figure 1Experimental paradigm of the block design. R, rest block; A, acupuncture block.
Figure 2Significant brain activations in the (A) healthy subjects at the AM condition; (B) stroke subjects in the AM condition; and (C) stroke subjects in the PM condition. The threshold was P<0.001 (uncorrected) at the voxel level with cluster size >20 voxels. SMA, supplementary motor area; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; SupG, supramarginal gyrus; MFG, middle frontal gyrus.
Summary of significant brain activations for the longitudinal contrast of (AM-PM) and (PM-AM) during acupuncture at the left ST36 in the healthy and patient groups.
| A, Healthy group (n=10) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Coordinates x, y, z (mm) | L/R | Label | Cluster size (voxels) | T |
| AM>PM | ||||
| 42, 36, 18 | R | Middle frontal gyrus | 1076 | 8.93 |
| 6, 39, 45 | R | Superior frontal gyrus | 777 | 8.03 |
| −12, −39, 18 | L | Posterior cingulum | 91 | 7.68 |
| 9, −42, −15 | R | Cerebellum | 403 | 7.32 |
| 9, −30, 21 | R | Thalamus | 88 | 7.26 |
| 3, −21, −30 | R | Cerebellum | 67 | 6.35 |
| PM>AM | ||||
| NA | ||||
|
| ||||
| B, Stroke group (n=10) | ||||
|
| ||||
| Coordinates x, y, z (mm) | L/R | Label | Cluster size (voxels) | T |
|
| ||||
| AM>PM | ||||
| 3, −84, 39 | L | Cuneus | 84 | 9.40 |
| 9, 21, 45 | R | Supplementary motor area | 95 | 6.42 |
| 54, −54, 42 | R | Inferior parietal gyrus | 89 | 5.21 |
| PM>AM | ||||
| NA | ||||
The thresholds were P<0.001 (uncorrected) at the voxel level, P<0.05 (familywise error corrected) at the cluster level. T, T-values of activation foci; R, right; L, left; NA, not applicable.