Literature DB >> 31189409

Automated Forelimb Tasks for Rodents: Current Advantages and Limitations, and Future Promise.

Anil Sindhurakar1, Samuel D Butensky2, Jason B Carmel1.   

Abstract

Rodent tests of function have advanced our understanding of movement, largely through the human training and testing and manual assessment. Tools such as reaching and grasping of a food pellet have been widely adopted because they are effective and simple to use. However, these tools are time-consuming, subjective, and often qualitative. Automation of training, testing, and assessment has the potential to increase efficiency while ensuring tasks are objective and quantitative. We detail new methods for automating rodent forelimb tests, including the use of pellet dispensers, sensors, computer vision, and home cage systems. We argue that limitations in existing forelimb tasks are driving the innovations in automated systems. We further argue that automated tasks partially address these limitations, and we outline necessary precautions and remaining challenges when adopting these types of tasks. Finally, we suggest attributes of future automated rodent assessment tools that can enable widespread adoption and help us better understand forelimb function in health and disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automated; behavior tasks; corticospinal tract; forelimb; motor behavior; motor function; motor recovery; rodent behavior; single pellet reaching task; skilled movement

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31189409      PMCID: PMC6681662          DOI: 10.1177/1545968319855034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  49 in total

1.  Synaptogenesis and Fos expression in the motor cortex of the adult rat after motor skill learning.

Authors:  J A Kleim; E Lussnig; E R Schwarz; T A Comery; W T Greenough
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Early motor activity drives spindle bursts in the developing somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Rustem Khazipov; Anton Sirota; Xavier Leinekugel; Gregory L Holmes; Yehezkel Ben-Ari; György Buzsáki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Improved single pellet grasping using automated ad libitum full-time training robot.

Authors:  Keith K Fenrich; Zacnicte May; Caitlin Hurd; Carolyn E Boychuk; Jan Kowalczewski; David J Bennett; Ian Q Whishaw; Karim Fouad
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The isometric pull task: a novel automated method for quantifying forelimb force generation in rats.

Authors:  Seth A Hays; Navid Khodaparast; Andrew M Sloan; Daniel R Hulsey; Maritza Pantoja; Andrea D Ruiz; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability.

Authors:  Howard G Wu; Yohsuke R Miyamoto; Luis Nicolas Gonzalez Castro; Bence P Ölveczky; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  A new rodent behavioral paradigm for studying forelimb movement.

Authors:  Marc W Slutzky; Luke R Jordan; Matthew J Bauman; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  An automated behavioral box to assess forelimb function in rats.

Authors:  Chelsea C Wong; Dhakshin S Ramanathan; Tanuj Gulati; Seok Joon Won; Karunesh Ganguly
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation Enhances Stable Plasticity and Generalization of Stroke Recovery.

Authors:  Eric C Meyers; Bleyda R Solorzano; Justin James; Patrick D Ganzer; Elaine S Lai; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Rapid formation and selective stabilization of synapses for enduring motor memories.

Authors:  Tonghui Xu; Xinzhu Yu; Andrew J Perlik; Willie F Tobin; Jonathan A Zweig; Kelly Tennant; Theresa Jones; Yi Zuo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Similar hand shaping in reaching-for-food (skilled reaching) in rats and humans provides evidence of homology in release, collection, and manipulation movements.

Authors:  Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Mariam Alaverdashvili; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.