Literature DB >> 29368229

Viability and biocompatibility of an adhesive system for intrarenal embedding and endoscopic removal of small residual fragments in minimally-invasive stone treatment in an in vivo pig model.

Simon Hein1, Dominik Stefan Schoeb2, Ingo Grunwald3, Katharina Richter3, Jörg Haberstroh4, Maximilian Seidl5, Peter Bronsert5, Ulrich Wetterauer2, Martin Schoenthaler2, Arkadiusz Miernik2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the viability and biocompatibility of a novel, patented bioadhesive system for intrarenal embedding and retrieval of residual fragments after endoscopic lithotripsy. Complete stone clearance via active removal of residual fragments (RF) after intracorporeal laser lithotripsy may be time-consuming and fail in many cases. Therefore, the novel adhesive has been developed and evaluated for the first time in an in vivo pig model in the present work.
METHODS: Four female domestic pigs underwent flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) under general anesthesia (8 kidneys, 4 × RIRS, 4 × PNL) evaluating the bioadhesive system.
INTERVENTIONS: RIRS without adhesive system (sham procedure, kidney I); 3 × RIRS using the bioadhesive system (kidneys II-IV); and 4 × PNL using the bioadhesive system (V-VIII). We endoscopically inserted standardized human stone probes followed by comminution using Ho:YAG lithotripsy. The bioadhesive (kidney II-VIII) was then applied and the adhesive-stone fragment complex extracted. After nephrectomy, all kidneys were evaluated by two independent, blinded pathologists. Endpoints were the procedure's safety and adhesive system's biocompatibility.
RESULTS: We observed no substantial toxic effects. We were able to embed and remove 80-90% of fragments. However, because of the pig's hampering pyelocaliceal anatomy, a quantified, proportional assessment of the embedded fragments was compromised.
CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we demonstrated the proven feasibility and safety of this novel bioadhesive system for embedding and endoscopically removing small RF in conjunction with a lack of organ toxicity in vivo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney calculi/therapy; MeSH Terms of the US National Library of Medicine; Ureteroscopy/instrumentation; Ureteroscopy/methods; Ureteroscopy/therapy; Urolithiasis/therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29368229     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2188-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  12 in total

1.  Clearance rates of residual stone fragments and dusts after endoscopic lithotripsy procedures using a holmium laser: 2-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Minyong Kang; Hwancheol Son; Hyeon Jeong; Min Chul Cho; Sung Yong Cho
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Novel Biocompatible Adhesive for Intrarenal Embedding and Endoscopic Removal of Small Residual Fragments after Minimally Invasive Stone Treatment in an Ex Vivo Porcine Kidney Model: Initial Evaluation of a Prototype.

Authors:  Simon Hein; Martin Schoenthaler; Konrad Wilhelm; Daniel Schlager; Karsten Thiel; Maria Brandmann; Katharina Richter; Ingo Grunwald; Ulrich Wetterauer; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: an update.

Authors:  J J Rassweiler; C Renner; C Chaussy; S Thüroff
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Alexandria C Smith; Janet M Hanley; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Contemporary surgical trends in the management of upper tract calculi.

Authors:  Daniel T Oberlin; Andrew S Flum; Laurie Bachrach; Richard S Matulewicz; Sarah C Flury
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Endoscopically Determined Stone Clearance Predicts Disease Recurrence Within 5 Years After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.

Authors:  Simon Hein; Arkadiusz Miernik; Konrad Wilhelm; Daniel Schlager; Dominik Stefan Schoeb; Fabian Adams; Werner Vach; Martin Schoenthaler
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  In vivo porcine model for practicing retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Lutfi Tunc; Berkan Resorlu; Ali Unsal; Ural Oguz; Akif Diri; Ali Serdar Gozen; Selahattin Bedir; Yasar Ozgok
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Similar metabolic responses in pigs and humans to breads with different contents and compositions of dietary fibers: a metabolomics study.

Authors:  Kirstine L Nielsen; Merete L Hartvigsen; Mette S Hedemann; Helle N Lærke; Kjeld Hermansen; Knud Erik Bach Knudsen
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 9.  Clinical significance of residual fragments in 2015: impact, detection, and how to avoid them.

Authors:  Simon Hein; Arkadiusz Miernik; Konrad Wilhelm; Fabian Adams; Daniel Schlager; Thomas R W Herrmann; Jens J Rassweiler; Martin Schoenthaler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Metabolomic perfusate analysis during kidney machine perfusion: the pig provides an appropriate model for human studies.

Authors:  Jay Nath; Alison Guy; Thomas B Smith; Mark Cobbold; Nicholas G Inston; James Hodson; Daniel A Tennant; Christian Ludwig; Andrew R Ready
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Practical considerations in the use of a porcine model (Sus scrofa domesticus) to assess prevention of postoperative peritubal adhesions.

Authors:  Claudio Peixoto Crispi; Claudio Peixoto Crispi; Fernando Luis Fernandes Mendes; Claudio Moura de Andrade; Leon Cardeman; Nilton de Nadai Filho; Elyzabeth Avvad Portari; Marlon de Freitas Fonseca
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Fibrin gel-assisted stone extraction in retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Yue Yu; Haibo Xi; Yujun Chen; Xuwen Li; Wei Liu; Jieping Hu; Jun Deng; Xiaoqiang Liu; Longhui Lin; Chen Li; Mengzhen Wang; Bin Fu; Gongxian Wang; Renrui Kuang; Xiaochen Zhou
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 5.969

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.