Literature DB >> 27000560

Clearance rates of residual stone fragments and dusts after endoscopic lithotripsy procedures using a holmium laser: 2-year follow-up results.

Minyong Kang1, Hwancheol Son2, Hyeon Jeong2, Min Chul Cho2, Sung Yong Cho3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the spontaneous clearance rates of remnant particles following miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).
METHODS: Among 624 patients who underwent mini-PCNL or RIRS at our institution from 2011 to 2015, we collected data of 247 patients with 2 years of follow-up. Of these, we included 148 patients with unilateral renal stones between 10 and 30 mm, as well as remnant particles after surgery. The size criteria of dusts and residual fragments (RFs) were, respectively, <1 and <3 mm.
RESULTS: After excluding 22 patients, 126 patients (RFs = 21, dusts = 98, and both RFs and dusts = 7) were analyzed. Mean age was 56.5 (±14.4) years, and mean stone size was 19.5 (±12.5) mm. The mean follow-up period was 18.5 (± 12.9) months. In patients whose remnant particles were naturally eliminated following lithotripsy, the mean stone passage time was 9.0 (±9.3) months in the dusts and 13.9 (±11.1) months in the RFs groups (P = 0.135). Remnant particles disappeared in 42 out of 105 patients (40.0 %) in dusts and 7 out of 28 patients (25.0 %) in RFs groups (P = 0.187). The size of dusts and RFs increased, respectively, in 18.1 % (19/105) and 28.6 % (8/28) of patients with remnant particles during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of dusts and RFs was poor prognostic factors in patients underwent renal stone surgery using a holmium laser. Complete residual stone removal by using a basket or dusts eradication by irrigation for an adequate time during surgery can be a good surgical strategy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laser; Lithotripsy; Predictive factors; Remnant particles; Urolithiasis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27000560     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1807-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  25 in total

Review 1.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy--the new standard of care?

Authors:  D E Zilberman; M E Lipkin; J J de la Rosette; M N Ferrandino; C Mamoulakis; M P Laguna; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomy on the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with lower pole renal stones.

Authors:  Berkan Resorlu; Ural Oguz; Eylem Burcu Resorlu; Derya Oztuna; Ali Unsal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Modified Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity score for retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Jung; Byung Ki Lee; Yong Hyun Park; Sangchul Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sang Eun Lee; Chang Wook Jeong
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Victoriano Romero; Haluk Akpinar; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

Review 5.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.

Authors:  Attasit Srisubat; Somkiat Potisat; Bannakij Lojanapiwat; Vasun Setthawong; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-24

6.  Contemporary Management of Medium-Sized (10-20 mm) Renal Stones: A Retrospective Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Murat Can Kiremit; Selcuk Guven; Kemal Sarica; Ahmet Ozturk; Ibrahim Buldu; Alper Kafkasli; Mehmet Balasar; Okan Istanbulluoglu; Rahim Horuz; Cihangir Ali Cetinel; Abdulkadir Kandemir; Selami Albayrak
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with moderate-size kidney stones: results of multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Berkan Resorlu; Ali Unsal; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Gokhan Atis; Zafer Tokatli; Derya Oztuna; Abdullah Armagan; Cenk Gurbuz; Turhan Caskurlu; Remzi Saglam
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones Larger Than 10 mm: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jeong Woo Lee; Juhyun Park; Seung Bae Lee; Hwancheol Son; Sung Yong Cho; Hyeon Jeong
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  CT with a computer-simulated dose reduction technique for detection of pediatric nephroureterolithiasis: comparison of standard and reduced radiation doses.

Authors:  Boaz Karmazyn; Donald P Frush; Kimberly E Applegate; Charles Maxfield; Mervyn D Cohen; Robert P Jones
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Management of Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments following Shock Wave Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Elisa Cicerello; Franco Merlo; Luigi Maccatrozzo
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-05-31
View more
  5 in total

1.  Viability and biocompatibility of an adhesive system for intrarenal embedding and endoscopic removal of small residual fragments in minimally-invasive stone treatment in an in vivo pig model.

Authors:  Simon Hein; Dominik Stefan Schoeb; Ingo Grunwald; Katharina Richter; Jörg Haberstroh; Maximilian Seidl; Peter Bronsert; Ulrich Wetterauer; Martin Schoenthaler; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  What is the exact definition of stone dust? An in vitro evaluation.

Authors:  Etienne Xavier Keller; Vincent De Coninck; Steeve Doizi; Michel Daudon; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements.

Authors:  Alexandre Danilovic; Bruno Aragão Rocha; Giovanni Scala Marchini; Olivier Traxer; Carlos Batagello; Fabio Carvalho Vicentini; Fábio César Miranda Torricelli; Miguel Srougi; William Carlos Nahas; Eduardo Mazzucchi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 4.  Optimal Delivery of Follow-Up Care for the Prevention of Stone Recurrence in Urolithiasis Patients: Improving Outcomes.

Authors:  Lazaros Tzelves; Marinos Berdempes; Panagiotis Mourmouris; Iraklis Mitsogiannis; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2022-04-19

5.  A simple predictive model with internal validation for assessment of stone-left after ureteroscopic lithotripsy in upper ureteral stones.

Authors:  Weisong Wu; Jiaqiao Zhang; Rixiati Yi; Xianmiu Li; Wenlong Wan; Xiao Yu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.