Literature DB >> 29368080

The Ebbinghaus illusion with small inducers appears larger on the right side.

Ayako Saneyoshi1.   

Abstract

The effects of left and right alignment on the Ebbinghaus illusion were investigated in three experiments. In Experiment 1, the Ebbinghaus illusion was presented on the left or right side, and the points of subjective equality (PSE) were measured. Only the central disk of the figure with small inducers was perceived larger when it was positioned on the right side rather than on the left. In Experiments 2 and 3, left, right, and central placement were used to determine if the results of Experiment 1 were caused by a decrease of the illusion on the left side or an increase of the illusion on the right side. There was no difference in the illusion effect between the left and the center; however, the illusion effect increased when the figure was presented on the right side. These results suggest that a hemispheric asymmetry for global and local spatial attention influences the laterality of the Ebbinghaus illusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ebbinghaus illusion; Global/local; Laterality; Spatial attention

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29368080     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5168-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.

Authors:  G Jewell; M E McCourt
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Georgina R Roberts
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Left of centre: asymmetries for the horizontal vertical line illusion.

Authors:  Elisha K Josev; Jason D Forte; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-11-25

4.  The effect of unilateral brain lesions on perception of visual illusions.

Authors:  A Grabowska; O Szymanska; A Nowicka; M Kwiecein
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1992-04-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Hemispheric asymmetries in global and local processing: evidence from fMRI.

Authors:  A Martinez; P Moses; L Frank; R Buxton; E Wong; J Stiles
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-05-06       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Functional MRI of global and local processing in children.

Authors:  Pamela Moses; Katherine Roe; Richard B Buxton; Eric C Wong; Lawrence R Frank; Joan Stiles
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Size contrast as a function of conceptual similarity between test and inducers.

Authors:  S Coren; J T Enns
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-11

9.  Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size.

Authors:  M E Nicholls; J L Bradshaw; J B Mattingley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Can task specific perceptual bias be distinguished from unilateral neglect?

Authors:  J B Mattingley; J L Bradshaw; N C Nettleton; J A Bradshaw
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  1 in total

1.  Familiarity with an Object's Size Influences the Perceived Size of Its Image.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Pauline E Weijs; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.