Literature DB >> 8290327

Size contrast as a function of conceptual similarity between test and inducers.

S Coren1, J T Enns.   

Abstract

In four experiments, the effect of the semantic relationship between test and inducing stimuli on the magnitude of size contrast in an Ebbinghaus-type illusion was explored. In Experiments 1 and 2, the greatest illusion was found when test and inducing stimuli were identical in shape and differed only in size. Decreased size contrast was found when inducing stimuli were drawn from the same category as the test stimulus, but were not visually identical. Even less size contrast was found when inducing stimuli were from a near conceptual category, with the least effect when they were drawn from a completely different category. In Experiment 3, it was demonstrated that even if test and inducing stimuli are drawn with identical geometric elements, the size contrast illusion is greatly reduced if they represent apparently different conceptual categories (through the manipulation of orientation and perceptual set). In Experiment 4, any geometric or spatial confounds were ruled out. These results suggest that size contrast is strongly influenced by the conceptual similarity between test and inducing stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8290327     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  24 in total

1.  Simultaneous sampling and length contrast.

Authors:  K Jordan; P W English
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-12

2.  Contrast and assimilation in the Baldwin illusion.

Authors:  A E Wilson; A W Pressey
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1988-02

3.  Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming.

Authors:  W La Heij
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-09

4.  Length contrast in the Müller-Lyer figure: functional equivalence of temporal and spatial separation.

Authors:  K Jordan; J Uhlarik
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-04

5.  A size contrast illusion without physical size differences.

Authors:  S Coren
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1971-12

6.  Judgmental model of the Ebbinghaus illusion.

Authors:  D W Massaro; N H Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-07

7.  Congruity and the perceptual comparison task.

Authors:  M Marschark; A Paivio
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects.

Authors:  S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-11

9.  Organization of factual knowledge.

Authors:  E E Smith
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  1980

10.  Assimilation and contrast illusions: differences in plasticity.

Authors:  J S Girgus; S Coren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-12
View more
  27 in total

1.  Making features similar: comparison processes affect perception.

Authors:  R R Hassin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.

Authors:  V H Franz; H H Bülthoff; M Fahle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Compared to what? Effects of categorization on hedonic contrast.

Authors:  Debra A Zellner; Elizabeth A Rohm; Terri L Bassetti; Scott Parker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

4.  Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on children's perception and grasping.

Authors:  Thomas Duemmler; Volker H Franz; Bianca Jovanovic; Gudrun Schwarzer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of visual expertise on a novel eye-size illusion: implications for holistic face processing.

Authors:  Genyue Fu; Yan Dong; Paul C Quinn; Wen S Xiao; Qiandong Wang; Guowei Chen; Olivier Pascalis; Kang Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The influence of attention toward facial expressions on size perception.

Authors:  Jeong-Won Choi; Kiho Kim; Jang-Han Lee
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-31

7.  Comparison of visual perceptual organization in schizophrenia and body dysmorphic disorder.

Authors:  Steven M Silverstein; Corinna M Elliott; Jamie D Feusner; Brian P Keane; Deepthi Mikkilineni; Natasha Hansen; Andrea Hartmann; Sabine Wilhelm
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Visual context processing deficits in schizophrenia: effects of deafness and disorganization.

Authors:  Heather K Horton; Steven M Silverstein
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Why do animals differ in their susceptibility to geometrical illusions?

Authors:  Lynna C Feng; Philippe A Chouinard; Tiffani J Howell; Pauleen C Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

10.  Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Sarah F Brosnan; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.478

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.