Hari Guragain1, Jan Cimbalnik1, Matt Stead1, David M Groppe1, Brent M Berry1, Vaclav Kremen1, Daniel Kenney-Jung1, Jeffrey Britton1, Gregory A Worrell1, Benjamin H Brinkmann2. 1. From Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology (H.G., M.S., B.M.B., V.K., D.K.-J., J.B., G.A.W., B.H.B.), and Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering (B.M.B., V.K., G.A.W., B.H.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; International Clinical Research Center (J.C.), St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic; The Krembil Neuroscience Centre (D.M.G.), Toronto, Canada; and Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics, and Cybernetics (V.K.), Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic. 2. From Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology (H.G., M.S., B.M.B., V.K., D.K.-J., J.B., G.A.W., B.H.B.), and Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering (B.M.B., V.K., G.A.W., B.H.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; International Clinical Research Center (J.C.), St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic; The Krembil Neuroscience Centre (D.M.G.), Toronto, Canada; and Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics, and Cybernetics (V.K.), Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic. brinkmann.benjamin@mayo.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the variation in baseline and seizure onset zone interictal high-frequency oscillation (HFO) rates and amplitudes across different anatomic brain regions in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: Seventy patients who had wide-bandwidth (5 kHz) intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings during surgical evaluation for drug-resistant epilepsy between 2005 and 2014 who had high-resolution MRI and CT imaging were identified. Discrete HFOs were identified in 2-hour segments of high-quality interictal iEEG data with an automated detector. Electrode locations were determined by coregistering the patient's preoperative MRI with an X-ray CT scan acquired immediately after electrode implantation and correcting electrode locations for postimplant brain shift. The anatomic locations of electrodes were determined using the Desikan-Killiany brain atlas via FreeSurfer. HFO rates and mean amplitudes were measured in seizure onset zone (SOZ) and non-SOZ electrodes, as determined by the clinical iEEG seizure recordings. To promote reproducible research, imaging and iEEG data are made freely available (msel.mayo.edu). RESULTS: Baseline (non-SOZ) HFO rates and amplitudes vary significantly in different brain structures, and between homologous structures in left and right hemispheres. While HFO rates and amplitudes were significantly higher in SOZ than non-SOZ electrodes when analyzed regardless of contact location, SOZ and non-SOZ HFO rates and amplitudes were not separable in some lobes and structures (e.g., frontal and temporal neocortex). CONCLUSIONS: The anatomic variation in SOZ and non-SOZ HFO rates and amplitudes suggests the need to assess interictal HFO activity relative to anatomically accurate normative standards when using HFOs for presurgical planning.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the variation in baseline and seizure onset zone interictal high-frequency oscillation (HFO) rates and amplitudes across different anatomic brain regions in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: Seventy patients who had wide-bandwidth (5 kHz) intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings during surgical evaluation for drug-resistant epilepsy between 2005 and 2014 who had high-resolution MRI and CT imaging were identified. Discrete HFOs were identified in 2-hour segments of high-quality interictal iEEG data with an automated detector. Electrode locations were determined by coregistering the patient's preoperative MRI with an X-ray CT scan acquired immediately after electrode implantation and correcting electrode locations for postimplant brain shift. The anatomic locations of electrodes were determined using the Desikan-Killiany brain atlas via FreeSurfer. HFO rates and mean amplitudes were measured in seizure onset zone (SOZ) and non-SOZ electrodes, as determined by the clinical iEEG seizure recordings. To promote reproducible research, imaging and iEEG data are made freely available (msel.mayo.edu). RESULTS: Baseline (non-SOZ) HFO rates and amplitudes vary significantly in different brain structures, and between homologous structures in left and right hemispheres. While HFO rates and amplitudes were significantly higher in SOZ than non-SOZ electrodes when analyzed regardless of contact location, SOZ and non-SOZ HFO rates and amplitudes were not separable in some lobes and structures (e.g., frontal and temporal neocortex). CONCLUSIONS: The anatomic variation in SOZ and non-SOZ HFO rates and amplitudes suggests the need to assess interictal HFO activity relative to anatomically accurate normative standards when using HFOs for presurgical planning.
Authors: D L Hill; A D Smith; A Simmons; C R Maurer; T C Cox; R Elwes; M Brammer; D J Hawkes; C E Polkey Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Peter Hastreiter; Christof Rezk-Salama; Grzegorz Soza; Michael Bauer; Günther Greiner; Rudolf Fahlbusch; Oliver Ganslandt; Christopher Nimsky Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: David M Groppe; Stephan Bickel; Andrew R Dykstra; Xiuyuan Wang; Pierre Mégevand; Manuel R Mercier; Fred A Lado; Ashesh D Mehta; Christopher J Honey Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Maeike Zijlmans; Premysl Jiruska; Rina Zelmann; Frans S S Leijten; John G R Jefferys; Jean Gotman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Julia Jacobs; Maeike Zijlmans; Rina Zelmann; Claude-Edouard Chatillon; Jeffrey Hall; André Olivier; François Dubeau; Jean Gotman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Benjamin H Brinkmann; Mark R Bower; Keith A Stengel; Gregory A Worrell; Matt Stead Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Shennan A Weiss; Zachary Waldman; Federico Raimondo; Diego Slezak; Mustafa Donmez; Gregory Worrell; Anatol Bragin; Jerome Engel; Richard Staba; Michael Sperling Journal: Biomark Med Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 2.851
Authors: Jan Cimbalnik; Petr Klimes; Vladimir Sladky; Petr Nejedly; Pavel Jurak; Martin Pail; Robert Roman; Pavel Daniel; Hari Guragain; Benjamin Brinkmann; Milan Brazdil; Greg Worrell Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2019-08-05 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Erin C Conrad; Samuel B Tomlinson; Jeremy N Wong; Kelly F Oechsel; Russell T Shinohara; Brian Litt; Kathryn A Davis; Eric D Marsh Journal: Brain Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Jessica K Nadalin; Uri T Eden; Xue Han; R Mark Richardson; Catherine J Chu; Mark A Kramer Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 2.987
Authors: Aaron M Spring; Daniel J Pittman; Yahya Aghakhani; Jeffrey Jirsch; Neelan Pillay; Luis E Bello-Espinosa; Colin Josephson; Paolo Federico Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 4.003