Shilpa Sreedharan1, Lynne S Nemeth2,3, Jason Hirsch4, Heather L Evans4. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA. 2. College of Nursing, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. 3. Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Abstract
Background: Surgical site infections complicate approximately 10% of all inpatient operations and account for nearly 20% of surgical re-admissions. Post-operative hospitalizations have become shorter over time, yet limited resources exist for patients to use at their home to communicate surgical wound problems with their medical providers. This study evaluated the attitudes of patients and providers towards using a remote wound monitoring application. Methods: This formative descriptive qualitative study reports the result of analysis of the interview content of five patients and five providers from a colorectal surgery clinic at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, South Carolina. Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted in the clinic setting, were recorded, and professionally transcribed. Two of the authors independently reviewed and coded the transcribed interviews to identify themes across all 10 interviews. After independent coding, authors reviewed findings to reconcile and streamline the primary themes representing attitudes of patients and providers toward remote wound monitoring. Results: Five primary codes were found across our interviews: current barriers, infection types, workflow, interest in surgical site infection (SSI) monitoring, application considerations, and requested application features. We subcoded "symptom clarification" and "positive anticipation" under "interest in SSI monitoring," as well as "anticipated issues" and "application features" under "application considerations." From these codes, we synthesized findings into three overarching themes: smartphone app for remote wound monitoring has potential to improve patient-provider communication, specific wound evaluation processes are acceptable to patients and providers, and new collaboration with telehealth service is a welcome addition for interdisciplinary team management. Conclusions: A prospective approach to the development of a remote wound monitoring application enables a user-centric development process. Our analysis shows a readiness from both patients and providers to implement remote wound monitoring for identifying potential SSIs and coordinating surgical wound care within the community.
Background: Surgical site infections complicate approximately 10% of all inpatient operations and account for nearly 20% of surgical re-admissions. Post-operative hospitalizations have become shorter over time, yet limited resources exist for patients to use at their home to communicate surgical wound problems with their medical providers. This study evaluated the attitudes of patients and providers towards using a remote wound monitoring application. Methods: This formative descriptive qualitative study reports the result of analysis of the interview content of five patients and five providers from a colorectal surgery clinic at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, South Carolina. Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted in the clinic setting, were recorded, and professionally transcribed. Two of the authors independently reviewed and coded the transcribed interviews to identify themes across all 10 interviews. After independent coding, authors reviewed findings to reconcile and streamline the primary themes representing attitudes of patients and providers toward remote wound monitoring. Results: Five primary codes were found across our interviews: current barriers, infection types, workflow, interest in surgical site infection (SSI) monitoring, application considerations, and requested application features. We subcoded "symptom clarification" and "positive anticipation" under "interest in SSI monitoring," as well as "anticipated issues" and "application features" under "application considerations." From these codes, we synthesized findings into three overarching themes: smartphone app for remote wound monitoring has potential to improve patient-provider communication, specific wound evaluation processes are acceptable to patients and providers, and new collaboration with telehealth service is a welcome addition for interdisciplinary team management. Conclusions: A prospective approach to the development of a remote wound monitoring application enables a user-centric development process. Our analysis shows a readiness from both patients and providers to implement remote wound monitoring for identifying potential SSIs and coordinating surgical wound care within the community.
Authors: Eyal Zimlichman; Daniel Henderson; Orly Tamir; Calvin Franz; Peter Song; Cyrus K Yamin; Carol Keohane; Charles R Denham; David W Bates Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013 Dec 9-23 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Ryan P Merkow; Mila H Ju; Jeanette W Chung; Bruce L Hall; Mark E Cohen; Mark V Williams; Thomas C Tsai; Clifford Y Ko; Karl Y Bilimoria Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Richard Scott Saunders; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Paul J Rathouz; Sandeep Saha; Jason T Wiseman; Jeffrey Havlena; Jon Matsumura; K Craig Kent Journal: Surgery Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Diane W Chen; Rachel W Davis; Courtney J Balentine; Aaron R Scott; Yue Gao; Nicole M Tapia; David H Berger; James W Suliburk Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Patrick C Sanger; Andrea Hartzler; Sarah M Han; Cheryl A L Armstrong; Mark R Stewart; Ross J Lordon; William B Lober; Heather L Evans Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lisa M Koonin; Brooke Hoots; Clarisse A Tsang; Zanie Leroy; Kevin Farris; Tilman Jolly; Peter Antall; Bridget McCabe; Cynthia B R Zelis; Ian Tong; Aaron M Harris Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 17.586