Literature DB >> 35021883

Patient and Provider Preferences for Monitoring Surgical Wounds Using an mHealth App: A Formative Qualitative Analysis.

Shilpa Sreedharan1, Lynne S Nemeth2,3, Jason Hirsch4, Heather L Evans4.   

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infections complicate approximately 10% of all inpatient operations and account for nearly 20% of surgical re-admissions. Post-operative hospitalizations have become shorter over time, yet limited resources exist for patients to use at their home to communicate surgical wound problems with their medical providers. This study evaluated the attitudes of patients and providers towards using a remote wound monitoring application.
Methods: This formative descriptive qualitative study reports the result of analysis of the interview content of five patients and five providers from a colorectal surgery clinic at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, South Carolina. Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted in the clinic setting, were recorded, and professionally transcribed. Two of the authors independently reviewed and coded the transcribed interviews to identify themes across all 10 interviews. After independent coding, authors reviewed findings to reconcile and streamline the primary themes representing attitudes of patients and providers toward remote wound monitoring.
Results: Five primary codes were found across our interviews: current barriers, infection types, workflow, interest in surgical site infection (SSI) monitoring, application considerations, and requested application features. We subcoded "symptom clarification" and "positive anticipation" under "interest in SSI monitoring," as well as "anticipated issues" and "application features" under "application considerations." From these codes, we synthesized findings into three overarching themes: smartphone app for remote wound monitoring has potential to improve patient-provider communication, specific wound evaluation processes are acceptable to patients and providers, and new collaboration with telehealth service is a welcome addition for interdisciplinary team management. Conclusions: A prospective approach to the development of a remote wound monitoring application enables a user-centric development process. Our analysis shows a readiness from both patients and providers to implement remote wound monitoring for identifying potential SSIs and coordinating surgical wound care within the community.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mHealth; post-operative care; remote patient monitoring; surgery; surgical site infection; telehealth

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35021883      PMCID: PMC8892972          DOI: 10.1089/sur.2021.240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1096-2964            Impact factor:   2.150


  18 in total

Review 1.  Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system.

Authors:  Eyal Zimlichman; Daniel Henderson; Orly Tamir; Calvin Franz; Peter Song; Cyrus K Yamin; Carol Keohane; Charles R Denham; David W Bates
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013 Dec 9-23       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Ryan P Merkow; Mila H Ju; Jeanette W Chung; Bruce L Hall; Mark E Cohen; Mark V Williams; Thomas C Tsai; Clifford Y Ko; Karl Y Bilimoria
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Mojtaba Vaismoradi; Hannele Turunen; Terese Bondas
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 1.857

4.  Outpatient follow-up versus 30-day readmission among general and vascular surgery patients: a case for redesigning transitional care.

Authors:  Richard Scott Saunders; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Paul J Rathouz; Sandeep Saha; Jason T Wiseman; Jeffrey Havlena; Jon Matsumura; K Craig Kent
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Effect of Home Monitoring via Mobile App on the Number of In-Person Visits Following Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kathleen A Armstrong; Peter C Coyte; Mitchell Brown; Brett Beber; John L Semple
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 6.  Proportion of Surgical Site Infections Occurring after Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Erik Woelber; Emily J Schrick; Bradford D Gessner; Heather L Evans
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.150

7.  Utility of routine postoperative visit after appendectomy and cholecystectomy with evaluation of mobile technology access in an urban safety net population.

Authors:  Diane W Chen; Rachel W Davis; Courtney J Balentine; Aaron R Scott; Yue Gao; Nicole M Tapia; David H Berger; James W Suliburk
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Telehealth follow-up in lieu of postoperative clinic visit for ambulatory surgery: results of a pilot program.

Authors:  Kimberly Hwa; Sherry M Wren
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Patient perspectives on post-discharge surgical site infections: towards a patient-centered mobile health solution.

Authors:  Patrick C Sanger; Andrea Hartzler; Sarah M Han; Cheryl A L Armstrong; Mark R Stewart; Ross J Lordon; William B Lober; Heather L Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Trends in the Use of Telehealth During the Emergence of the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, January-March 2020.

Authors:  Lisa M Koonin; Brooke Hoots; Clarisse A Tsang; Zanie Leroy; Kevin Farris; Tilman Jolly; Peter Antall; Bridget McCabe; Cynthia B R Zelis; Ian Tong; Aaron M Harris
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 17.586

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.